The Harder They Fall, The Decline and Crash of Winchell and Imus- 4-12-07

The Harder They Fall!

 

The Decline and Crash

Of

Walter Winchell and Don Imus

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

4-12-07

 

Quo dues vult perdere prius demontrat is Latin for “Those whom God wishes to destroy, he first makes mad.”

 

In a sense both of these media giants were made mad with their lust for power, acceptance, love and respect. Their ego and self-adulation made them lose focus over both the real and corporate world that allowed them so much freedom and rewards. It could be said that they were the ultimate victims of a self-delusion that allowed them to believe that they were permanently invulnerable and that they had built an impenetrable firewall buttressed by their charitable works and constructed on the backs of a never ending supply of sponsors, sycophants, and fans who craved more and more.

 

The comparisons of the persona and the careers of Don Imus (1940-) and Walter Winchell (1897-1972) seem to have some interesting parallels. Though they both came from incredibly different backgrounds, and their careers never overlapped, their dominance of the media and their ability to blend the elements of entertainment and politics had some distinct similarities. Both of them had long careers that bridged the gap from one generation to another, and both of their careers were filled with controversy, disputes, feuds, personality conflicts, and ultimately quick and agonizing declines. At the time of their fatal mistake and collapse, both were thought to be at the peak of their power and influence. But, in reality, they had peaked earlier, and their quick slide into ignominy, was caused by what seemed at the time as minor incidents. But neither individual had a vast public reservoir of universal support. In the case of Don Imus, who had established a long career in morning radio that went back into the late 1960’s, he had alienated many, many people over the decades. Even though Imus, like Winchell, had developed a strong political and journalistic following, in the end it could not save him from public censure and unhappiness.

 

Imus, who had earlier developed a program that thrived on iconoclasm, was able in the last decade to, with the immense help of Newsweek and the NBC network, and others, bring in the most important political and journalistic stars of the current era. Eventually The NY Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and the network anchors flocked to the Imus Ranch. (The one in New York, not New Mexico.) The political joke in all of this was that Imus and his cohorts were not liberal. If anything, Imus was a populist-leaning libertarian who gave “lip-service” to candidates from all over the political spectrum from Rick Santorum, to Harold Ford Jr., to John McCain, to Joe Lieberman to Charles Schumer. His closest assistants, Charles McCord and Bernard McGirk were definitively not liberals, by any stretch of the imagination, but on the air, they humored the ephemeral Imus, who knew instinctively ho to blow with the current political breezes. Besides all of that, he paid them handsomely. Interestingly, the majority of journalists who regularly appeared his show would have been thought as moderates or liberals, but he was also quite comfortable with Pat Buchanan, David Brooks, Mary Matalin, and a number of others. He did think Rush Limbaugh was an overweight, pill-popping, blowhard, but that was probably because his New York audience leaned that way also. But, like Walter Winchell, who was able to blend entertainment, gossip and politics together, and made vicious comments a habit, an on-the-air offensive and derogatory remark by McGirk and Imus about the Rutgers’s women’s basketball team snowballed into a fatal landslide of indignant public outrage. In the case of Don Imus it wasn’t his audience that wore blinders or his willing accomplices and his friends in the political world or the media that did him in. It was his sponsors, the mother’s milk of all commercial entertainment. They ran from him as if he were the reincarnation of “Typhoid Mary.” The news of his remarks smoldered like a delayed-fuse bomb. The remarks churned around the Internet and sites like Media Matters picked them up and started to re-hash his other racial and religious diatribes. Of course, if anyone were concerned about bigotry on this radio show Imus in the Morning, you should just “get over it.” That’s what Imus told Jeff Greenfield on CNN’s, Larry King Live in February of 2000. But of course calling African-American journalist Gwen Ifill “a cleaning lady, “ and tennis player Amelie Mauresmo  “a big old lesbo,” or Len Berman of NBC sports as “Len the Jew,” didn’t mean much to Imus. He even told 60 Minutes that he hired Bernard McGirk to do “N-g–r” jokes in 1998. But to Imus that was a long, long, time ago. He also originally denied that he had said that or had hired McGirk for that reason!

 

Unfortunately discerning listeners knew better. Of course, the “wonderful” Mr. Imus has characterized his hundreds and probably thousands of slurs and insults as parody and political satire. Of recent date, he decided that his sketches of General Patton and Richard Nixon were too out of date, so he started in with ones about Cardinals Egan and O’Connor. He used to like Bill Clinton, but when Clinton became President and didn’t have time for the “new” Don, Imus went to Washington D.C. one evening, hosted a dinner for the Clintons and proceeded to excoriate the President and the First Lady. As of the other day, he has had his own version of Bill Clinton ready and able to spout some Arkansan “down home” remarks, and he casually refers to Senator Hillary Clinton as the worst person in the world or the devil incarnate. Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune, a Black journalist who has two Pulitzer Prizes on his fireplace, used to be a guest on the Imus Show. Paige, after recognizing Imus for what he was, had Imus pledge, with his hand high in the air, that he would not make racial slurs again. Imus made the pledge in 2001. I think Paige was sick of hearing Imus referring to blacks as gorillas or “simian references to black athletes.” Not to anyone’s surprise or it seems to Paige himself, he hadn’t been invited back since that day.

 

Similarly in the late 1950’s the long, controversial, and successful run of Walter Winchell came to a shattering end. He was a phenomenon who had emerged from the roaring 1920’s, when the era of mass media really came alive. Winchell was a vaudeville hoofer in his teens and started his famous and unprecedented journalistic career by posting gossip notes about people within the troupe of performers. He gravitated from entertainment to news reporting when he started with the New York Evening Graphic. Of course his style was unique, and he was the first person to reveal the names and the private stories of the rich and famous. But of course his success was not wholly dependent on the lurid details that he revealed. His style was unique, his writing broke the mold that had characterized most columnists of the day, and he wrote in a staccato rhythm punctuated by slang and choppy phraseology. He was a creator of a new journalistic language that included words like; scram, pushover and belly laughs.

 

Imus on the other hand was born in California and served in the Marine Corp in the late 1950’s after he dropped out of high school. He bummed around as a miner, a gas station jockey and a railway worker. He even worked in a rock band. He started his radio career in 1966 in Palmdale California as a disc jockey, stayed for two years or so, got hired on at KJOY in Stockton and was fired for saying “hell” on the air. Times have really changed, haven’t they! From there he went to KXOA in Sacramento and WGAR-AM in Cleveland. In 1971 he began work wound up in New York on WNBC-660 AM.

 

In the 1930’s, as the radio media became so incredibly important, Winchell eventually expanded his career to the airways and opened his broadcasts by pressing intermittently on a telegraph key. It created urgency about his program and about what he wished to say. His audience was always on the edge their seat and his delivery was fast, urgent, and powerful. Few who heard him would forget his “Good Morning Mr. and Mrs. America and all the ships at sea. This is Walter Winchell in New York. Let’s go to press.”

 

After the demise of the scatological oriented Graphic, Winchell started his 34-year run with the New York Daily Mirror. The Mirror, which folded on October 16, 1963 after a 114-day newspaper strike, was basically a tabloid devoted to three elements; sleaze, horse racing and Walter Winchell. It was founded by William Randolph Hearst as a rival to the New York Daily News, another very popular news tabloid, which was devoted to sensationalism, gossip and lurid sex. The Mirror was published a number of times each day. Basically its numerous editions were to update the racing results as the news came in from the Aqueduct, Belmont or Saratoga. Race Tracks. (Which ever happened to be open.) I remember riding in a cab with my grandfather, John Kivo, in New York City, along 3rd Avenue, in the early 1960’s. He, I soon learned, frequently wagered on the horses. Often he placed bets with a “bookie” and on that day he wanted to know the results of a specific race of which I knew nothing. He therefore asked the cab to pull over, and told me to get out and run over to a newsstand and pick up the Mirror. The paper was a thin “rag” with barely any news. Its front page was always festooned with banner headlines and usually a large lurid picture. Inside the front cover, there was a page or so of gossipy news, some cartoons, very little legitimate advertising, and four or five pages of horse racing news, tout sheets and results. Even their sports section was pretty sparse.

 

Of course Hearst and the Mirror hired Winchell, and this “rag” became his “main” paper. Eventually he was syndicated in 2000 newspapers and was given a radio show as early as 1930 and a TV show in the early 1950’s. He was well connected with many people in high places and became the repository of a great deal of malicious gossip. There were many people who used Winchell and his column as a very willing collaborator in the destruction of people whom his sources didn’t like. In the 1930’s he became an early anti-Nazi advocate and became the darling of the liberals. Even FDR made sure that he was fed many exclusives.

 

At the same time, in the 1930’s at the peak of his power, which emanated from Broadway and was syndicated around the country, more competition started to evolve in Hollywood. Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper became almost as famous as Winchell. Hedda Hopper, the daughter of a butcher from Hollidaysburg, Pa., was one of nine children. She ran off to New York to escape her Quaker neighborhood just outside of Altoona, and met De Wolf Hopper, an aging, but imposing and broken down actor who had been married four times. By 1935, the thin and pretty now named Hedda, who had done some stage work and movies, was fifty years old, divorced and out of work. Her friend Eleanor “Cissy” Patterson, the publisher of the Washington Herald suggested she start a column, and call it Letter from Hollywood. This put her in direct competition with the established grande doyenne of the Hollywood gossip set, Louella Parsons. The more homely and rotund Parsons was born in 1896 and was from Dixon, Illinois. After working tirelessly in Chicago for the Record-Herald writing film reviews and features, the paper collapsed and was merged into the Hearst paper, The American. She was married, divorced and lost her job, but found employment with the New York Morning-Telegraph. Five years later she assumed her same type of work with Hearst’s New York American. Eventually she made friends with the actress Marion Davies who happened to be the mistress of William Randolph Hearst. She went to Los Angeles on an excursion in 1925, was feted by the Hollywood community who was awed by her column and her influence with Davies and therefore Hearst. She had a bout of tuberculosis in New York and returned for further recuperation to the warmer climate of southern California. It was in Los Angeles that the plain and roundish Ms. Parsons found her spiritual home. She was invited to stay there permanently by Hearst, and he made her the motion-picture editor of his Universal News Service.

 

These long time rivals loathed each other. But no matter how they acted they were very similar to each other. They were both politically rightwing, narrow-minded, small town oriented and prudish. They fit right in a community that was also conservative and on the surface sexually inhibited and proper. They used gossip as a threat to keep the Hollywood stars and personalities in line. Basically because these gossip columnists were used by the film industry in this method, as a “control” factor, and not as a malicious cudgel, they therefore never had the power of Winchell.

 

Imus meanwhile finally hit it big in New York with his first successful parody based on his character the Reverend Billy Sol Hargis, aplay on a preacher with almost the same name, and Texas oil-swindler, Billy Sol Estes. But success did spoil Don Imus and WNBC fired him for his cocaine and vodka abuse. Eventually after drying out, he was again hired by WNBC in 1979. The corporate “suits” must have been gluttons for punishment. The station also hired the infamous Howard Stern during the period of 1982-5. Though they started as colleagues they soon became heated rivals, and it has been said that Imus abandoned much of his old routines and copied Stern’s format. Stern blasted Imus regularly and accused him of creating a staff of adversarial personalities, expanding his audience through syndication and bringing TV cameras into the radio studio. For sure his show and his so-called humor radically changed after the appearance of Stern on WNBC-Radio.

 

Winchell, after years of dominating news and gossip in the press and on the radio, like his Hollywood counterparts, basked in the essence of his overwhelming power. He had few real friends, and his associates were basically limited to his fellow professionals with whom he rubbed up against at his favorite watering hole the Stork Club. When Leonard Lyons, one of his contemporaries, and the father of my great friend the late George Lyons, wrote a story about how Jack Haley’s voice had been dubbed by Buddy Clark in the 1932 movie, loosely based on Winchell, Wake Up and Live, Winchell went ballistic. He accused Lyons of betraying him. He said in a telegram to Lyons, “I’m tired of my intimates annoying me, and I am tired of having to worry about reminding them to do something or not do to something.” In other words Winchell thought that “good friend” Lyons was “scooping” him on his own movie!

 

The seething Lyons finally wrote him an answer. He later stated “…if I was a real pal of Winchell’s, I’d show it just like his other real pals do – by becoming a parasitic sycophant, taking dough from stars to get their names into Winchell’s column, and bleeding a living out of them.” Over the years Winchell and Lyons would spar over many issues. Eventually the political Winchell, who loved Franklin Roosevelt, became annoyed with Lyons who was close to FDR’s successor, Harry S Truman.

 

Of course, Winchell eventually became deeply into politics and was privy to a great deal of insider information from Washington. One of his sources was one Ernest Cuneo, (Later an OSS founder, a friend of Ian Fleming) the associate counsel of the Democratic National Committee. Cuneo was a big guy, weighing almost 300 pounds and was called, not so affectionately “fatso” by Winchell. Cuneo was from New Jersey, went to Penn State on a football scholarship and dropped out mysteriously. Later on he transferred to Columbia University, became influenced on campus by Drew Pearson and Adolf Berle and became an advocate of social justice and liberalism. At Columbia, he starred in football and became an All-American.  Eventually after graduating from St. John’s law school he landed a job in New York City working for Mayor LaGuardia. When FDR was elected, he got a job in his administration working as a trouble-shooter for the famous Thomas “Tommy the Cork” Corcoran; a legendary Harvard educated Washington fixer. With all of the machinations that surrounded FDR’s potential acceptance of a 3rd term, it was Cuneo, who is made contact with Winchell, and it was through Winchell that talk of a 3rd term started to be floated. Eventually Winchell’s column and radio show became the clarion that blared out the “Draft Roosevelt” message in 1938. This effort became a very valuable tool for Roosevelt’s supporters who constantly denied, through many strategic leaks, that the President would seek a 3rd term.

 

Of course, Winchell aggressively pushed for re-armament and a two-ocean navy, and with the administration’s blessing took on Congressmen and Senators who were opposed. He confronted was Representative Jacob Thorkelson of Montana., whom he branded the “mouthpiece of the Nazi movement in Congress.” Thorkelson demanded equal time to rebut Winchell, eventually denounced him on the floor of Congress as a “Jewish vilifier” who slanders anyone “who cannot see eye to eye with his own organized minority.”  Three weeks later he was defeated in the primary in his state.

 

Winchell’s story is long and complicated, but for sure he was the “King of the Media.”

The Mount Airy Times said of Winchell, “There is today a 100% American – a man who for the future sake of this country should exist not as an individual but in innumerable numbers. He is Walter Winchell, one of the most intelligent men ever to speak into a microphone or write for a newspaper.” Of course he had his detractors and one of the worse was Westbrook Pegler, a hater of the Roosevelt’s, whose own pen, according to Harold Ickes, was so venomous the he would no more think of reading him than he would of handling raw sewage.

 

On the other hand, Don Imus, and his crew led by McCord and McGirk, unlike Winchell, who was Jewish, and would never indulge in any racial or religious epithets, were repeatedly accused of racism, misogyny, homophobia and anti-Semitism. In December of 2004, Imus referred to his publishers Simon & Shuster as “thieving Jews,” and later in the show issued a mock apology, saying the phrase was “redundant.” He once referred to Media critic Howard Kurtz as “that boner-nosed…beanie-wearing Jew boy.” In fact he constantly referred to certain journalists who were Jewish about not believing in the “baby Jesus.”

 

Unlike the new, super, self-confidant Don Imus of the late 1990’s, Walter Winchell, who was not an intolerant individual, seemed always insecure. The thought of his own journalistic demise had floated through his mind since the end of World War II and ironically his long tortuous slide to self-destruction finely began at 11:15 pm on October 16, 1951 in the Stork Club, because of a racial issue!

 

Josephine Baker, who was part of a chorus line in New York, was invited in 1925 to join a troupe of black dancers in a tour of France. She became the sensation of Paris and within a year opened her own club in Paris. She remained in France, became a great star and claimed French citizenship. She became so famous with her stage act that she was also invited to make movies, which included the successful films Zouzou (1934) and Princess Tamtam (1935). She was so well known and popular that even the Nazis, who occupied France during World War II, left her alone. This allowed Baker the freedom to help her adopted new homeland and she secretly worked for the resistance (FFI- Free French of the Interior). After the war her grateful and adopted country awarded her the Croix de Guerre, among many other decorations for her heroism.

 

She decided to come back to America, and she contemplated offers from various sources. She was offered engagements that paid from $10,000 to $20,000 per week. But the America she returned to in 1951 was still a captive of Jim Crow in both the south and many places in the north. Winchell, who had done many things for the Black-American community and was a symbol of racial toleration and liberalism, was very friendly with Sherman Billingsley, (1900-1966), the owner and operator of the Stork Club that was located at 3 East 53rd Street. Billingsley was an ex-bootlegger from Enid, Oklahoma, whose mistress, for many years was Ethel Merman. She was the one who introduced him to Walter Winchell. It was a watering hole for the rich and famous, which included, at times, Hemingway, Chaplin, J. Edgar Hoover, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, the Roosevelt’s, the Harriman’s, Judy Garland, the Kennedy’s, Elizabeth Taylor, Marilyn Monroe and many others. There was even a television series that featured Billingsley and the club from 1950 through 1955. The Cub Room or sanctum, sanctorum was guarded by a captain named “Saint Peter,” and it was off limits to most.

 

When Baker arrived at the Stork Club with her husband, Jo Buoullon, another friend, Bessie Buchanan, and Mr. and Mrs. Roger Rico, they were seated, and according to Baker she ordered crab salad, steak and a bottle of French wine. Interestingly her friends received their meals and she did not. After an hour wait and other slights, Rico, who was friendly with Billingsley, demanded that her meal be brought. In the meantime, Winchell, who was always at his regular table (number 50) saw Baker and her friends come in and acknowledged her presence. He certainly knew she was there, and may not have known what had happened at her table, and eventually left before she and her party had finished. Eventually her friend urged her to inform the NAACP about her treatment. Baker called Walter White, the head of the NCAAP and complained. According to Winchell, he had left before this “so-called” incident happened, saw nothing and departed. Of course this version was changed in later years. Eventually Winchell got dragged into the ensuing and ongoing controversy that eventually involved Thurgood Marshall, the counsel for the NAACP and many others. Winchell had a long and well-documented history of helping out blacks who had gotten in trouble during World War II. He had fought for the decorating of the late Seaman Dorrie Miller, who was a hero at Pearl Harbor and later killed in action. He personally intervened with President Roosevelt and Eleanor Roosevelt on the behalf of many blacks who were caught up in the Jim Crow criminal justice system that stretched from the south even to South Dakota. He helped the boxer Sugar Ray Robinson in Miami, and took black friends into Lindy’s restaurant in New York.

 

As the “Baker Incident” became more radioactive, Winchell got wrapped up with all of his excuses, the lies by Billingsley, the efforts by his political friends to insulate him from the incident, his friendship with Billingsley and the demands by Walter White to set the record straight. White wanted him to sign a simple statement that he would thenceforth not patronize the Stork Club or encourage others to do so. The issue became a personal one between Winchell and White and it escalated by the hour. Eventually it came down to those who thought that the issue was over civil rights and that the Stork Club’s policies were a perfect example of discriminatory practices. On the other side were all the others who thought Baker had created a “tempest in a teapot.” But Winchell was caught between his personal feelings, his long history of fighting for the underdog, and his belief in civil rights and his friendship with Billingsley and his headquarters at the Stork Club. Billingsley was still essentially an Oklahoma farm boy and therefore he refused to write a conciliatory letter to White and the NAACP and eventually wrote an inflammatory letter, which he later denied. The letter was a horror. It basically stated that he would never serve obnoxious people, and that his “trade” did not want to associate with that sort. On top of that he stated that Walter Winchell was not involved and shouldn’t be dragged into the conflict. Billingsley’s brother Logan denied that his brother was a racist. But he told the NY Post,  “You know, he cares only for the finest people and it wouldn’t do him any good to let all the N-gg—s in there.”

 

Of course, the public was made aware of this incident and picketing ensued at the Stork Club. Winchell went on the offensive against Josephine Baker. He dug up everything, accused her of fascist leanings, and kept up the assault. With an issue that should have pitted Billingsley against Baker, Winchell made it his fight.

 

Many of Winchell’s old enemies like Ed Sullivan (1901-1974, who took over his column at the Graphic and was the host of the Toast of the Town on CBS-TV from 1948-1971),

 

Sullivan lived in the Delmonico Hotel with his wife Sylvia Weinstein from 1930 to her death in 1973. My grandfather lived on the same floor, and casually knew both Sullivan and Phil Silvers, who also lived in that famous Park Avenue domicile. My grandfather loved to tell me that “Old Stone Face,” as Sullivan was known, used to say hello by saying, “Pops where can one get a good Jewish meal around here?”

 

Barry Gray (1916-1996, born Bernard Yaroslaw, was called the Father of Talk Radio. He hosted shows on WOR and WMCA from 1945-1989 and was called “Borey Pink” by the red-baiting Winchell) and James Wechsler (1915-1983) of the NY Post started to align themselves with other Winchell haters, and they all moved in for the kill. The more he attacked Baker and defended himself, the more his old allies on the “left” abandoned him. Eventually he was isolated from all of his old friends from the halcyon days of the New Deal and the war. It was a different era and Winchell started to attach himself to the new wave that Joe McCarthy was riding. But McCarthy’s old and new friends despised Winchell. He had no new allies from his old audience and his listeners. And readers started to drift away. His popularity on radio and television had crested and started to slip. In fact, when his few friends and many foes alike criticized or attacked Winchell, he used his control of the Damon Runyon Cancer Fund as a lever against their taunts and barbs.

 

As per example, when Jack Paar (1918-2004), had become the host of the wildly popular Tonight Show (1957-1962)he had Elsa Maxwell (1883-1963, the most famous party giver in New York’s social history- “The Hostess with the Mostest”) as his guest. She accused Winchell of hypocrisy for waving the flag while never having voted. Parr, an earlier victim of one of Winchell’s inaccuracies joined in the criticism. Winchell, from Hollywood called Maxwell a, “fat, sloppy, smelly c—t” and threatened to sue each of Paar’s sponsors for having damaged the Runyon Fund. Winchell, with the help of Leonard Lyons, Dan Parker, Leo “Lindy” Linderman had created the Fund in the name of the writer Damon Runyon, (1884-1946, a Broadway writer and columnist who created the characters who were immortalized in “Guys and Dolls”). Runyon was his friend and he had succumbed to the disease in 1946. The Fund, which Winchell controlled as the treasurer, and constantly promoted, raised over $100 million for cancer research. The sparring between Winchell and his old buddies continued when Runyon board member Leonard Lyons, wrote in early 1951 to the fund’s president Dan Parker with a new list of questions about the fund and its allocation of monies. He had learned through media announcements about new appointments to the fund’s committee and claimed that the organization shouldn’t be used as a one-man (Winchell’s) operation. Eventually, Morris Ernst the fund’s attorney complained that the fund’s legal affairs were a mess, and he generally agreed with Lyon’s complaints. Winchell’s representative, and lawyer Ernest Cuneo addressed the fund’s board meeting in September of that year. Cuneo stated that the Board must choose between Winchell and Lyons, and if Lyons did not quit Winchell would. Winchell held the proxies, and Lyons was forced to resign.  After the coup d’etat was accomplished, Sherman Billingsley was asked to take Lyons’s position on the board, and Marlene Dietrich, Milton Berle, and Sugar Ray Robinson were added to the board with their proxies to be held by Winchell. Lyons, who worked for the NewYork Post, never backed his papers editorial and reporting attacks on Winchell, but that didn’t end their battle. Winchell could never forgive anyone, and continued to publicly attack him. Eventually Lyons would not stay in the same room with him, and with the shabby treatment he received by Billingsley, he stopped going to the Stork Club.

 

Like Winchell, Don Imus is and was also involved heavily in charity. He’s truly a sentimentalist at heart and started an over the air campaign to raise money to fight Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and operates the Imus Ranch for children with cancer. He helped raise many millions for the Center for the Intrepid, a Texas rehabilitative facility and took on the Veteran’s Administration over its Walter Reed abuses. But when the Wall Street Journal’s reporter, Robert Frank, wrote an article that raised questions about the New York State Attorney-General’s tax inquiry into the Imus Ranch, he went almost insane. He harassed Frank with unremitting venom. This was typical of Imus. Anyone who wrote an article about him that he thought was unflattering or anyone that missed going on his show or displeased him he attacked with savagery. By attacking Imus they were attacking kids with cancers, the wounded veterans, and parents who lost their child to SIDS. Even Ms. Mary “Cokie” Roberts, an ABC-TV journalist, and the daughter of the late Hale Boggs, former Democratic Majority Leader, (her mother Lindy Boggs, also served in the House of Representatives) who was killed in a plane crash, who had been a frequent guest on his show, decided not to come back on his program, was excoriated for a whole week. She eventually decided to come back for a “token” appearance. It was better for her to switch than fight. So in a way, Imus, like Winchell seemed quite sincere about charity, but for sure they both used it as “defense” against attacks on their characters.

 

The “Baker Incident,” at the Stork Club, did not suddenly end Walter Winchell’s spectacular career. But at age 54, after 25 incredible years, his high water mark was met, crested and never exceeded. It wasn’t that his collapse happened immediately because of this one foolish, stupid, and egregious act. His career, which was permeated and pockmarked with fights, feuds, and pettiness, reflected his arrogance and the hypnotic and addictiveness of power. After the war and the death of his idol Franklin Roosevelt, his power started to gradually wane. His shifting allegiance away from the progressive philosophy of the New Deal and the anti-fascists led him to darker alliances with the anti-communists and their movement. His involvement with McCarthy, Roy Cohn and many others of that ilk poisoned him with his old contacts and sources. It seem he needed a new “cause” and the one that searched out and exposed the so-called “pinkos” and “fellow-travelers” in our society fit him well.

 

Over the rest of his life he struggled to hold on to that massive audience that he once held in the palms of his hands. His personal life, which included wife (common-law), his estranged children, and their failed lives, his girl friends, and former associates, was a disaster. By the time of his death in 1972, from the effects of prostate cancer, his influence and name had completely disappeared from the view of his former public. By 1972, it had been years since he could call anyone a friend. His family had disappeared because of death, suicide, and estrangement. It was a long and slow social and spiritual decline. It was in a sense the “long goodbye.” In the hard-hitting 1957 movie, The Sweet Smell of Success, written by Clifford Odets, starring Burt Lancaster, a character loosely based on Winchell, and Tony Curtis as his “stooge,” the film conveys the viciousness of the business that Winchell basically invented. There is no doubt that the life of Walter Winchell reflects the famous statement by Lord John Emerich Acton,  “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (1887). Power corrupted Winchell completely and he believed that he was some kind of avenging god. But in truth, he was as mortal as anyone else and if anything he had become a demagogue. At the end he was alone, an empty and lonely vessel. Though his obituary was on the front page of The NY Times, it seemed no one really cared. He had faded so fast from the public eye in the last decade of his life, and even though he outlived many of his enemies, he had become irrelevant. In a sense that was his greatest fear. At his funeral only two people attended. What a fitting end to a man who had alienated almost all of whom he knew. What a climax to a man who had deluded himself over his self-importance. Eventually the era that had spawned copycats like Sullivan, Dorothy Kilgallan, Earl Wilson, Jack O’Brian, Leonard Lyons, and scores of others would come to an end as the newspaper industry shrunk to a fraction of its former self. No one ever reached the stratospheric heights that Winchell has ascended to and therefore the same fall!

 

The incident involving the Imus in the Morning program and the eventual termination of Don Imus’s career started, in his mind, innocently. There was no big controversy. There was no huge issue. It wasn’t the war, or the Bush administration, or Hillary, or Walter Reed Hospital, or Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Syria, or Attorney-General Gonzales’ upcoming testimony, or a myriad of other serious things out there to criticize. The local story was that morning was the Rutgers’s women’s basketball team’s Cinderella story had ended with a defeat in the NCAA Women’s basketball finals. During their normal sport’s segment, a tape of the final game, pitting the Lady Scarlet Knights versus the Tennessee Volunteers was played. Imus and his crew was used to hearing thousands of sport’s reports throughout the years. Every morning one of their “team” reviewed the past evening’s action. Imus had the obnoxious Sid Rosenberg on for a period of time. But Sid, who had a reputation of being a gambler, a drug abuser, and one who “ran around,” had become even too radioactive for Imus. He was one who had characterized the tennis-playing Williams sisters as women who were animals and would be a better fit for the National Geographic than Playboy!  Eventually Rosenberg, who was a reprobate at best, made fun of singer Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer diagnosis, “She won’t look so pretty when she’s bald with one t–.” That was even too much for Imus and he was fired in September of 2005. After nine months, WAXY 790, in Miami, eventually hired him. Rosenberg had also been co-hosting a WFAN sports segment from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM and because of his substance abuse problems, tardiness and a missed assignment he went from the WFAN to rehab to exile out of New York radio. His replacement, a WFAN update guy, named Chris Carlin, was the new Imus sports reporter. Carlin, who was quite heavy, became the butt of the Imus brand of vicious humor every morning. Carlin, a straight shooter, who did not join in with the Imus repartee was seen by him as a bit dull and boring. In truth Carlin was an up and coming professional sports announcer, who like others on the station, broadcasted football and basketball for local schools like Rutgers or St. Johns. Because Carlin never fit in regarding the Imus comedy routine and picking on him every day became boring and tasteless, Sid Rosenberg was returned gradually to the fold. Rosenberg was a perfect foil for Imus and his brand of irrelevant humor, which was laced with scatological innuendos, sexual double-ententes, and iconoclastic irreverence, fitted comfortably into the Imus mold.

 

Of course this set the stage for what was to be their cataclysmic moment. The only real sports story that morning was the defeat of the Rutgers’s team by the powerful Tennessee perennial champs, and since the program was simulcast on MSNBC, they played a segment of the game. Imus looked at the monitor and stated, “That’s some rough girls from Rutgers” and “man they got tattoos…” McGirk, his sidekick, chimed in, “Some hardcore ho’s.” Imus then added, “That’s some nappy headed ho’s there, I’m going to tell you that.” He went on to add, “The girls from Tennessee, they all look cute, kinda like a Spike Lee thing – the jigaboos versus the wannabees.”

 

When these statements were uttered, there were no biblical thunderclaps. There was no dramatic pause or feelings that they had stepped into a field of landmines that would eventually destroy them and their programming future. No it was business as usual. It was back to the irreverent “fun and games” that always was the base of the Imus format. Imus, as with the late and obviously unlamented Walter Winchell, was built of sterner stuff and remarks critical of friend and foe had been rolling off his tongue for decades. Did he reflect one iota on what he and his foil had just said? No way! They could care less. They had broadcasted decades of weekly programming with material that “played the edge” on race, religion, gender, and disability. Therefore, the stage was set, the drama had been put in place and the slow ticking time-bomb of public opinion was set and there was no way to reverse the consequence. Imus has built a career on tearing down the so-called powerful. He had made his name in the last decade by inviting the famous and powerful of journalism to his salon. He had become a forum for the politicians and their political views. Therefore they became his “fig-leaf.” They became his “willing executioners” in the words of Daniel Goldhagen. Their appearances had sanctioned his bombast, his “hissy” fits, his faux outages, and his iconoclastic crusades. To oppose Imus one had to take on his media platform, his charity work, the cure for SIDS, his children’s crusade against autism and cancer. He was really a misunderstood knight in shining armor that was opposing the forces of evil. In his own words, “he was a good man.” 

 

But finally in the immortal words of Martin Niemeller (1892-1984), the German Protestant clergyman of the Hitler era, “In Germany they came first for the communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionists. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.” Finally some one spoke up and it was heard.

 

 

 

The Harder They Fall– by Budd Shulberg (the Title)

Winchell; Gossip, Power and the Culture of Celebrity– by Neal Gabler- reference and background!

The Interent- Wikipedia- available to all!

 

 

 

 

Letter to the NY Times- Fire Imus 4-9-07

The NY Times

Letter to the Producer

April 9, 2007

 

 

I just read David Carr’s piece on Mr. Don Imus in today’s NY Times. Mr. Imus had the temerity to disgustingly refer to the Rutgers University’s women’s basketball team as “nappy headed hoe’s.”  As a father of a daughter who graduated from Rutgers, and a listener to WFAN, I believe that Mr. Imus should be suspended and permanently removed from the airwaves. He has had a long history of trashing African-Americans, Jews and Catholics. His parodies of Cardinals Egan, O’Connor and former President Bill Clinton are incredibly offensive, and his loutish conduct is repulsive. I am constantly amazed that so many political figures of both parties and broadcast personalities come on his program. Either they are unaware of his true repulsive character or don’t really listen to the claptrap he promulgates with sidekicks like Bernard McGirk and Sid Rosenberg. The late and unlamented Jimmy Snyder (known as Jimmy the Greek) was fired after twelve years on CBS-TV following a remark to a reporter about “the racial superiority of black athletes.” In comparison to Snyder’s foolish and inaccurate remarks, Mr. Imus crosses the “taste and decency” barrier each and every moment. If we really wish our society to place the “race” issue behind us, then WFAN and the FCC should take steps to make our “free airwaves” free from Imus and his race and religious baiting rhetoric.

 

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

The Kennedy Library 4-2-07

The Kennedy Library

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

April 2, 2007

 

 

It’s an easy drive from anywhere in Boston to College Point where the library is located. It shares a peninsular with the massive Boston branch of the University of Massachusetts, and on a clear day, from the museum, one can see the downtown skyline of Boston.

 

I’ve been there often over the years and my daughter, in the early 1990’s, was even an intern there while she was getting her Masters Degree from Boston University. Its architecture blends in with sea that JFK loved and fittingly surrounds the edifice. On this particular day we were in Boston to celebrate my son Jon’s 31st birthday and attend a Seder in Peabody at the home of an old business colleague.

 

So with a few hours to wander around, we again chose the Kennedy Library and Museum. The first venue is a room full of artifacts and a film commemorating the late President’s trip to Ireland in the summer of 1963. One can sense the utter and unrelenting joy expressed by the Irish people towards their adopted son of Eire. He, of course, promised to come back but never had that chance. One quickly gets introduced to the early life of John Kennedy in a seventeen- minute film, which included some wonderful interviews rarely seen and the more famous Person-To-Person segment with Edward R. Murrow. As we walked through the various rooms and observed the displays that chronicled Kennedy’s military service and political life, we sat down and watched his whole 1960 Convention acceptance speech from the Los Angeles Coliseum. I had very little memories of that address given 47 years ago, but Linda, I, and many others sat transfixed with his message and eloquence. Over the last almost 50-years there have been few political speeches that matched that effort. Of course the letters to and from his mother were precious. In one, the President asks his mother Rose to please clear it with his office before she writes personal requests for autographs from foreign heads of state.

 

Of course I took a photo (enclosed) of the Stueben glass model of the PT-109 that was presented by the late Lt. Commander Fred W. Rosen (Linda’s cousin) representing Peter Tare, the PT Boat’s Officer Alumni Association, who was a close friend of the President.

 

There is a marvelous film segment at the very end of the museum tour where President Bill Clinton tells of his boyhood Rose Garden meeting with President Kennedy. We must have watched it ten times.

 

What a great loss for the country. The charm, élan and elegance of the Kennedy’s was with us for only a brief moment. As I look back, it was all too short and we have not experienced anything like it or them since.   

 

 

 

Letter to the Editor, Baltimore Sun -Reply to Thomas Sowell 4-5-07

To: 'letters@baltsun.com'
Subject: Sowell Column

As usual with the Republicans and their sycophants, another attack is made on the Democrats. Thomas Sowell chirps in with his criticism of Nancy Pelosi's trip to Syria. He makes a comparison with FDR and the use of Wendell Willkie as a comparison. Unfortunately the circumstances were and are quite different. Willkie was not the typical isolationist Republican, but actually was a registered life-long Democrat and an internationalist before becoming the GOP standard bearer in 1940. By the time Willkie was asked to help with FDR's foreign policy, we had been attacked, Congress declared war, and the country was unified behind the great leadership of the late President. Willkie was asked to speak for the President, as was Averill Harriman, Harry Hopkins and others.

 

Unlike his illustrious predecessor, George W. Bush has embarked on an ill-fated, poorly planned, and disastrous adventure in a land that did not attack the United States. We all know that the late and unlamented Sadaam Hussein was a horror and a bully in a rotten neighborhood. But it was Bush 41 that had the power to remove him and normalize Iraq, but didn't. Hussein had been contained for years and yes; he should have been squeezed harder. Our real effort should have focused on Afghanistan where the Taliban and their Al Quieda guests and collaborators were centered. If George Bush had concentrated our forces there with a quick strike, rather than the slow and undermanned, poor strategy of General Tommy Franks, our antagonists would have been rounded up and destroyed.

 

But Sowell and other Bush acolytes have conveniently ignored the Bush-Cheney-Rove policies of “cooking the books” on WMD along with other fables and fantasies about Iraq. Now we are in the fifth year of this disaster. It has now escalated and widened to a civil insurrection pitting Sunni versus Shiite along with terrorists and foreign forces adding to the damage. They are all struggling both for power and the continued hemorrhaging of America.

 

Speaker Pelosi is not a defeated opponent of George W. Bush! She represents the result of the American people's wish for change. Positive change, not go it alone adventurism that has led to our current wallowing in the quagmire of death, destruction and domestic disunity. She went there to stimulate talk, openness and the desire for a change. We certainly need a change. Over three thousand of our sons and daughters have paid the ultimate price for Bush's miscalculations and lies. We have spent hundreds of billions going nowhere fast, but Sowell bemoans Pelosi's effort. She went into the lion's den where Ms. Rice and her department should be. She has made the effort that is long overdue by confronting one of the major players in the region. I note, when a Republican contingent ventured to Syria, nary a peep was heard from Bush, the State Department, and the President’s dwindling minority of supporters.

 

I say to Thomas Sowell, “wake up and smell the roses!” Bush and his administration has been an abject failure at home and abroad. The people spoke in 2006 and they will again speak loud and clear in 2008. At least the Democrats, after much criticism, have placed the onus on Bush to start fulfilling his empty promises to finish our effort, and get out before we have no friends left in the world and our nation is in chaos.

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

   

As nation faces a grave threat, Pelosi assumes presidential power

<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml” />


April 5, 2007

Congressman Tom Lantos, who is a member of the delegation that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi led to Syria, put the mission clearly when he said: “We have an alternative, Democratic foreign policy.” Democrats can have any foreign policy they want – if and when they are elected to the White House.

Until Ms. Pelosi came along, it was understood by all that we had only one president at a time and – like him or not – he alone had the constitutional authority to speak for this country to foreign nations, especially in wartime.

All that Ms. Pelosi's trip can accomplish is to advertise American disunity to a terrorist-sponsoring nation in the Middle East while we are in a war there. That in turn can only embolden the Syrians to exploit the lack of unified resolve in Washington by stepping up their efforts to destabilize Iraq and the Middle East in general.

Members of the opposition party, whichever party that might be at a given time, have known that their role was not to intervene abroad to undermine this country's foreign policy, however much they might criticize it at home. During World War II, the defeated Republican presidential candidate, Wendell Willkie, even acted as President Franklin D. Roosevelt's personal envoy to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. He understood that we were all in this together, however we might disagree among ourselves about the best course to follow.

Today, Ms. Pelosi and the congressional Democrats are stepping in to carry out their own foreign policy and even their own military policy on troop deployment – all the while denying that they are intruding on the president's authority.

They are doing the same thing domestically by making a big media circus over the fact that the Bush administration fired eight U.S. attorneys. These attorneys are among the many officials who serve at the pleasure of the president – which means that they can be fired at any time, for any reason or for no reason.

That is why there was no big hullabaloo in the media when President Bill Clinton fired all the U.S. attorneys across the country – even though that got rid of the U.S. attorneys who were conducting an investigation into corruption in Mr. Clinton's administration as governor of Arkansas.

So much hate has been hyped against George W. Bush that anything that is done against him is unlikely to be questioned in most of the media.

But whatever passing damage is being done to President Bush is a relatively minor concern compared with the lasting damage that is being done to the presidency that will still be here when Mr. Bush is gone.

Once it becomes accepted that it is all right to violate the laws and the traditions of this nation, and to undermine the ability of the United States to speak to other nations of the world with one voice, we will have taken another fateful step into the degeneration of this society.

Such a drastic and irresponsible step should remove any lingering doubt that the Democrats' political strategy is to ensure that there is an American defeat in Iraq in order to ensure their political victory in 2008.

That these political games are being played while Iran keeps advancing relentlessly toward acquiring nuclear weapons is a fateful sign of the utter unreality of politicians preoccupied with scoring points and a media obsessed with celebrity bimbos, living and dead.

Once Iran has nuclear weapons, that will be an irreversible change that will mark a defining moment in the history of the United States and of Western civilization, which will forever after live at the mercy of hate-filled suicidal fanatics.

Yet among too many politicians in Washington, it is business as usual. Indeed, it is monkey business as usual, as congressional Democrats revel in the power of their new and narrow election victory last year to drag people before committee hearings and posture for the television cameras.

It has been said that the world ends not with a bang but with a whimper. But who would have thought that it could end with political clowning in the shadow of a mushroom cloud?

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His column appears Thursdays in The Sun. His e-mail is info@creators.com.

Copyright © 2007, The Baltimore Sun | Get Sun home delivery

 

 

Letter to Cong. Charles Rangel 4-3-07

Representative Charles B. Rangel

15th Congressional District

U.S. House of Representatives

163 West 125th Street

Suite 737

NYC, NY 10027

 

April 3, 2007 

 

Dear Congressman Rangel,

 

Over the years I have been an active and involved Democrat from Westchester County. My adult political career started as a District Leader in White Plains in the fall of 1969 and I was even the White Plains co-chairperson for George McGovern in 1972. Over the years I have also had the pleasure of meeting you at different locales and venues in the County. I cannot say that we are in “lock-step” on every little issue, but I can readily say that we generally agree on most political perspectives. Currently I am still active as the campaign Chairperson for Supervisor Paul Feiner of the Town of Greenburgh, and have been working with Mayor Ernie Davis of Mount Vernon on a comprehensive downtown re-vitalization.

 

Last Sunday, I had the distinct pleasure of seeing you on WNBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert. In all of the years that I have been watching, I can say without equivocation that your interview and remarks were as interesting, enlightening and inspiring as any I have heard in many, many years. As usual, you handled yourself with grace and aplomb, and because of that interview, I told my wife Linda that we must order your book immediately. In fact, I was just up in Boston celebrating the first Seder with my adult children, Dana (who is the assistant admissions director for the John F. Kennedy School at Harvard,) and my son Jon (a Princeton EE grad, a software designer in Cambridge) and told them that your interview shouldn’t be missed. They both later watched the program via the Internet. Your remarks about your mother and brother evoked a tear in my eye, and anyone who listened to your interview should now understand completely your unquestioned patriotism and commitment to a more just America. Your life is an American success story, and your experience and leadership is what America so vitally needs now in Congress.

 

Keep up the good work, and when you are back visiting Westchester, please keep me informed (via email). I would like to have the opportunity to say hello in person once again and participate in your efforts.

 

Regards and continued good luck and health,

 

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

Hot Dogs at HoHoKam and Stuff Derma in Palm Springs 3-28-07

Hot Dogs at HoHoKam Park and Stuff Derma in Palm Springs

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

March 28, 2007

 

 

Spring baseball is big business in the state of Arizona. There are many teams who now have their spring training facilities in the Sunshine State, and because it rarely rains there almost every single game gets played. In the same way that Florida has attracted throngs of fans each March, Arizona has also attracted sell-out crowds. The Texas Rangers, Seattle Mariners, California Angels, Oakland A’s, Colorado Rockies, San Diego Padres, Arizona Diamondbacks, Chicago White Sox, Kansas City Royals, Milwaukee Brewers, San Francisco Giants and the Chicago Cubs now call Arizona their home. Most of the parks are an easy drive from Phoenix, which is located in almost the center of the populated part of Arizona. We were staying once again in the Westin Kierland Resort, which straddles the border between Phoenix and Scottsdale on the Greenway Blvd. It’s an easy 15 minute drive from Scottsdale Road about 7.5 miles to the City of Mesa and HoHoKam Park, the home of the Chicago Cubs. As we were planning this trip, Linda and I looked over the Cactus League schedule and found the date and game which was most convenient. We decided on the Cubs, who were scheduled against the Seattle Mariners. A few years earlier, we had traveled to see the Giants play the Kansas City Royals in the Scottsdale Stadium, so we knew that parking was a premium, and therefore one must leave early.

 

There was no problem finding HoHoKam Park and within 15 minutes, we were right on N. Center Street, which leads directly to the field. Unfortunately those neighborhoods are not built for sellout crowds, and it took us another 20 minutes to get into their parking area. But we had built in plenty of extra time, and once we parked we able to reach the park in less than five minutes. HoHoKam is a beautiful little field that holds approximately 12,575 fans. There are 8000 regular seats in the grandstand area, 2000 bleacher seats, where we sat in section 220, row NN and seat 8 and 9 and room for 2575 others who wish to picnic on the lawn beyond the outfield walls. The ballfield’s grass is immaculate, the left field wall is 340 feet, the right field stretches 350 and straight-away center is 410. The power alleys are 390. It is not a small ballpark!

 

The Cubs have been playing in Mesa since 1979. Since they moved into the HoHoKam Complex, they have had sellout crowds. In 1999 they set their attendance record with 171,681 in 15 home games. In other words, this is big business for Mesa and the Cubs. The Cubs have been at fourteen sites since they had originally started playing spring ball in Selma, Alabama in 1900. But over the next forty years from 1903 thru 1941 they were basically located in Southern California. Every once in a while, they made stops in Shreveport, LA, Tampa, FL and a few other places until settling into Arizona in 1952. Except for 1966 when they were in Long Beach, CA, they have divided most of their time between Mesa and Scottsdale.

 

Our tickets cost $10, and the sight lines were wonderful. Arizona is usually warm in March, but the week we were there, the temperature never dropped below 95 F during the afternoon. But the Arizona air is dry, and therefore the humidity is almost non-existent. Our seats were down the 3rd baseline and we quickly settled in with our water, snacks and sun tan lotion. We had a wonderful time watching the hometown Cubs throttle the Mariners 9-3. We were amazed at the large amount of enthusiastic and optimistic Chicagoans that were there, and we found out that many people come down specifically to see their team. I cannot say that there were a lot of “household” name ballplayers on the field, but I certainly recognized former Yankee star Alphonso Soriano, who had three hits including two triples and Cliff Floyd, late of the Mets, who socked a three run homer. Spring training games are not usually played to win, but no one likes to lose.

 

So the game was a sellout, and the food and souvenir bourses that were located under the stands were incredibly busy. Other than the lines for beer and the women’s facilities, the Cubs’ Store was packed. Meanwhile the best buy, other than our seats, were the hot dogs. They were twice the size of any dog every eaten in Yankee Stadium and about half the price. For sure to experience the real flavor of a ballgame, whether in Mesa, AZ or the Bronx, one must have a hot dog smothered with dark mustard and washed down with a cold beer. So we had our fill of sun and fun by the 7th inning. We wanted to make sure that we were able to get out of the parking lot before the game ended, and before long we found our rented Saturn, programmed our dashboard GPS system and found our way out of Mesa and back to Scottsdale.

 

So after days of frolicking in 95+ F heat that included numerous games of tennis, day trips to the frontier towns of Carefree and Cave Creek, and antiquing in Glendale and Olde Towne, the second half of our trip was a sojourn out into and across the western Arizonan desert to the Coachella Valley, California and the home of the Westin Rancho Mirage. Rancho Mirage is a sister city to Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Thousand Palms, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Bermuda Dunes, Indio, and Cathedral. It’s a straight 276-mile drive across US Route 10 from Scottsdale, and if the sun is right, the mountain vistas are quite impressive. There are not many places to stop so one better have a full tank of gas, an empty bladder and some provisions. About halfway, there is the town of Quartzsite, which is located in La Paz County sitting in the shadows of the Dome Rock Mountains. Quartzsite is the home to 3000 year round residents, but welcomes 1,000,000 visitors in the month of January. Last year they counted 760,000 RVs if you can believe that. Quartzsite, the most non-descript watering hole one could imagine, has a downtown featuring large truck stops, a gigantic gasoline station and a strip of open air souvenir, collectible and western merchandise bourses. Most of the time Quartzsite is a place where various liquids and fluids, bodily and commercial are exchanged. One can get awful thirsty out there in the sagebrush. After one leaves Quartzsite its only about 30 or so miles to the California border and as one approaches the town of Blythe, one passes just north of the US Army’s Yuma Testing Ground (a restricted area). After Blythe, it is on to Rancho Mirage and the first real landmark one could see is the massive Agua Caliente Hotel and Gambling Casino on Route 10 and Ramon Road. (We actually stopped in for a few minutes, despite Linda’s trepidations, and on the last pull of the “one-armed bandit” I found myself with my original pile of quarters back and five dollars extra!)

 

After checking into our suite of rooms at the Westin, we ventured out with our faithful GPS guided Saturn and look for food. Instinctively one of the first places we found was an uptown branch of a deli named Sherman’s. This Lower East Side style culinary oasis located on Country Club Road in Palm Desert was an excellent find, and we were able to buy chopped liver, sliced turkey, and some rolls and bagels at a reasonable cost.

 

So we began the second chapter of trip. Eventually we found more supplies at Bristol’s and the Pavilion’s. We found the tennis courts, played a lot on their brown painted concrete surfaces, went to a time-sharing update session that rewarded us with 3000 more Starwood points for sitting down, and started to get use to desert resort living. The Coachella Valley is an incredibly busy place that caters to the wealthy and the near wealthy. The valley is crisscrossed with drives, boulevards and avenues named for local luminaries named Frank Sinatra, Bob Hope, Dinah Shore, Fred Waring, Gene Autry, and Gerald Ford. It was probably in the valley, with its myriad of gated communities and pristine fairways that the former president launched scores of round missiles at goggling on lookers. One thing one notices right away is the incredible amount of private clubs that dot the wide byways. Only in the Coachella Valley, which is 45 miles long, populated by over 400,000 souls, and is in Riverside County, a bit southeast of the San Bernardino Mountain range, can one drive on the city streets at speed limits posted up to 60 mph.

 

For the next number of days, we enjoyed touring around, eating out, strolling through the El Paseo shopping district in Palm Desert, visiting Old Town in exclusive La Quinta, and going to the Palm Springs Air Museum, with its remarkable collection of vintage WWII planes. Arizona seems to be the home to old warplanes. In Tucson, at the Pima Air Museum, one could stroll through acres of old de-activated B-52’s. The Palm Springs collection boasts that all of its planes are able to be flown, and it lists on its inventory, Mustangs (P-51’s), a British Spitfire, a Thunderbolt (P-47), a Flying Tiger (P-40), a Chance-Vought Corsair (F4U), a Flying Fortress (B-17), a Mitchell Bomber (B-25) and numerous other famous craft. A World War II buff could easily swoon amongst such honored machines.

 

Meanwhile, we were blessed with a visit from our old buddy Dr. Larry Reich from Mount Vernon, who now hangs his hat and shingle in Los Angeles. Though we email and talk all the time, it had been seven long years since we last met. We had a great time re-hashing old stories and finally had dinner at Outback’s after which Larry headed back to Los Angeles. (Larry has been out of New York for 36 or more years, with at least ten years in Hawaii with his wonderful parents who followed him, and the balance of his time in Los Angeles.)

 

 The next day we wound up at The Palm Springs Art Museum with its outstanding western and modern art collection. After seeing all there was to see, we headed out to the real Sherman’s deli on Tahquitz Canyon Road in the heart of Palm Springs. We sat outside, were given pickles and I ordered stuffed derma (kishkes) and a hot pastrami plate. The derma was the real test. Could this oasis of Jewish cuisine three thousand miles west of Houston Street match up with Katz’s deli? The derma came out sliced in five or six pieces and seared on both sides with terrific beef gravy. I gingerly put my fork in expecting the worse, but I was pleasantly surprised. It was good! No, it was very good!  Linda taking no chances had salmon, but I was ready for the next course a hot pastrami platter with rye bread, coleslaw Russian dressing, and a diet Dr. Brown’s cream soda. I was already anticipating being letdown, but again our waitress came through and came through quickly and magnificently. The platter was jammed, the meat looked and smelled delicious, and I quickly made one sandwich with mustard and the other with the coleslaw and the Russian dressing. I was in gastronomic ecstasy. I savored every last morsel of that wondrous Romanian culinary classic and after settling our $36 bill, we sauntered out to the street fair already in full swing on East Palm Canyon Road.

 

Every Thursday night the merchants of Palm Springs host a street fair located on East Palm Canyon Road in the heart of Palm Springs. Just about everything could be eaten or bought along this long stretch within Palm Spring’s main shopping street. We walked up and down for a few blocks, worked off our meal, and headed back to the Westin Mission Hills at Rancho Mirage. So we finally saw Palm Springs and the remarkable Coachella Valley. The next day it was back to Phoenix and off to New York. With all of the fun and frolic, our adventures took us from one culinary marvel to another. A great hot dog at HoHoKam Park and a wondrous stuffed derma and hot pastrami in on Tahquitz Street. Who would have ever guessed?

 

 

 

 

Eleanor Roosevelt: A Life to Live 3-8-07

Eleanor Roosevelt a Life to Live

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

3-8-07

Hebrew Institute, White Plains, NY

 

Eleanor Roosevelt, one of the most remarkable women of the 20th Century and certainly one of the outstanding women of history said, in 1937, “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.” In other words, if you wish to be victimized it will surely happen. Eleanor Roosevelt was an individual born to privilege who was not exempt from being a victim. This is My Story, 1937

 

In a sense she grew mightily as an individual and said later in her life, “You gain strength, courage and confidence by every experience in which you really stop to look fear in the face. You are able to say to yourself, ‘I lived through the horror. I can take the next thing that comes along.’… You must do the thing you think you cannot do.” You Learn from Living, 1960

 

Therefore the story of Eleanor Roosevelt is a compelling one that should bring meaning to everyone. She certainly was not perfect, she obviously had her faults and she for sure had to deal with them in her own way, and basically alone. In a sense it is like the old saying, “water, water, everywhere, but not a drop to drink. Eleanor Roosevelt was constantly surrounded by people, good, bad, and indifferent, but basically was forced to re-create herself, time and time again. This is her story. I have basically divided it into eight segments.  It attempts to cover her life from her early days as a lonely unwanted, uncared for child, a product of a dysfunctional family, to her role as the First Lady of the World, the most admired person of her age and in the end, her living the greatest life. Of course this great life is intertwined with the most dramatic events of our history and partnered with one of most dynamic men who has ever lived.

 

 

 

 

Anna Eleanor Roosevelt

1884-1962

 

Early Life

 

I.                   Born in NYC (56 W.37th Street) to Elliot Roosevelt the younger brother of Theodore Roosevelt and Anna Ludlow Hall, who was a descendant of the Livingstons, (William Livingston was a signer of the US Constitution)

II.                Her father was a carefree, fun loving man, an alcoholic and irresponsible. His family virtually collapsed in 1891 when Eleanor was 7 when they were on a European trip. She had two brothers, Elliot Jr. (1889-93) and Hall (1891-1941)

III.             Her mother was a beautiful woman, who died at 29 from diphtheria, when Eleanor was age 8. It seems that he mother, a striking beauty, was disillusioned with Eleanor and probably motherhood. Her father basically abandoned her, living a dissolute drunken life, here and abroad, and died soon afterward from a seizure in 1894 when she was 10.

Her mother called Eleanor granny, and it seemed that she was highly disappointed with her looks and saddened disposition. As to her drunken father, Eleanor had a completely romanticized notion of him. He spent long periods away from the family, either off in a sanatorium 19th century’s version of a substance abuse rehabilitation center, or off on liaisons of debauchery. He wrote her long letters expressing his love, but he was totally unable to come to grips with reality. One time he left her waiting on the steps of his club, and spent hours drinking and completely forgot she was there. No one knows whether he was clinically sick or a victim of depression because he was not skilled at anything.

IV.           She was sent to live with her grandmother, Mrs. Valentine (Mary Ludlow) Hall, a stern Victorian, with her two younger brothers. Shortly thereafter the older of these brothers, Elliot, died. She always felt guilty over her brother’s death.

V.              She was a lonely child, suffering from probably an inferiority complex, she felt rejected and unloved and abandoned by her dead mother, and fantasized and rationalized about her romantic father, who seemed to show her love and affection in his letters. Along with this burden, her grandmother was a difficult and unsentimental Victorian. Mrs. Hall also had extreme problems raising her own sons who were dysfunctional and verged on insanity. The young Roosevelt children lived in fear with them in the Hall home, and it was not unusual for these young men to shoot at strangers with rifles from upstairs windows.

The alcoholism of her father would not only affect Eleanor all her life, but it seemed to be genetically transmitted to her brother Hall, who was an alcoholic and died from its affects at age 50. Eleanor therefore shied away from alcohol and almost always begged off from FDR’s daily afternoon cocktail ritual, called the “Children’s Hour” held with his aides, White House intimates, and his private secretary Marguerite “Missy” LeHand.

VI.           She was sent abroad to be educated in an English finishing school with other society daughters called Allenwood, which was run by one Mlle. Marie Souvestre, (1830-1905). This school had a great impact on Eleanor, giving her first a carefree and open atmosphere of learning and a climate to develop her intellect. She developed both sensitivity to social issues and, the sense of duty to champion the underdog.

 

Life in NY after Allenwood

 

I.                   Upon returning to NY, at age 18, she found that the social life of her class was uninteresting, vacuous, and boring, Life in New York among the well-born upper classes was one of endless parties, other social events and a day filled with the ritual of ever-changing clothes for each time of o the day or each social occasion.

She was involved in the Henry Street settlement and there she met a great many of the Jewish poor from the Lower East Side. It was there that she started to soften her sense of class prejudice and casual anti-Semitism. She would also feel uncomfortable about materialism and felt that many of her husband’s Jewish associates talked too much about money, jewels and travel. To a degree she was an early captive of the stereotypical perspectives of her class. Inherently it was always old money versus the nouveau riche. Later on, as she developed tolerance for the under privileged she came in contact with many educated and talented Jews who were involved the labor movements, the women’s rights campaigns and the effort to achieve social justice. Later on she would develop a strong social friendship with Elinor Morgenthau, the wife of the future Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr. 

II.                She was pressured by her grandmother to debut, but even retreated to her room during her coming out party.

III.             To escape the life of leisure of women of her class she joined

a.     The Junior League

b.     Taught dancing at the Rivington Street Settlement

c.     Visited and aided needy slum children

d.     Worked for the Consumer’s League

IV.           During this period she re-meets meets her distant cousin Franklin D. Roosevelt

a.     He was from the Hyde Park branch of the Roosevelt family. Eventually she and her 6th cousin Franklin D. Roosevelt meet at one of her numerous coming out events through the efforts of TR’s sister, her aunt, Corinne Robinson She liked his humor, easy going social confidence and ambition. He liked her discipline and serious concern for the welfare of others. In a sense, she understood her own needs reflected the lack of nurturing in her own childhood. On the other hand, FDR was as nurtured as anyone could be. The Hyde Park Roosevelts were Democrats unlike their Republican cousins, the Oyster Bay branch. As a wealthy Democratic contributor to the party, FDR’s father James was able to take him to Washington, in 1893, to meet President Grover Cleveland. The President, a large bluff man, put his hand on eleven year old Franklin’s shoulder and gave him his one blessing that he never will be burdened with the difficult job of being President. What irony! Unlike Eleanor, who was suffering in a stultifying home, he was off visiting the President.

 

After being home educated until age fourteen and then being sent off to Groton, FDR graduated and went off to Harvard. After earning his degree in three years he spent an extra year there after graduation, to become editor of the Crimson. Because of his work with Harvard’s newspaper, he always though of himself as a journalist and had therefore an affinity for reporters and the press. During his days at Harvard, his father died, (James was 26 years older than his mother Sara). He always had difficult relationships with his fellow classmates from Groton, who had started in school years before, and got along better with younger students. While at Harvard he had one of his first setbacks. Procellian, the Harvard eating club, which his father and TR had belonged, blackballed him.

b.     Active in campus politics, though a Democrat, he forms a support group for his cousin Teddy Roosevelt’s re-election in 1904.

c.     He even starts to wear pince-nez glasses like his famous 5th cousin.

d.     Eleanor and Franklin court are secretly engaged for a year and marry on St. Patrick’s Day 1905. They are given away by her famous Uncle Teddy, who is in town for the parade, and leave for an extended European honeymoon. Ironically after the marriage couple is left standing alone, when her Uncle Teddy and all the other Porcellians go off to a room and sing Porcellian house songs.

e.     After a long European honeymoon, where Eleanor is basically worn out they move to NYC.

They lived in a twin townhouse, given to them by Sara, in New York while FDR attended Columbia Law School. The house had connecting floors and it was said, from Eleanor’s early perspective that she had no privacy or independence from her mother in law. But in fact, this was probably very normal for many families. Eleanor had not had a normal childhood and her frame of reference, vis-à-vis her mother-in-law was probably distorted. In fact, Sara Delano was very generous to her.  She arranged that the house on Campobello Island be given to her. In her life Eleanor Roosevelt never remarked negatively about Sara and her views on her seemed to vacillate emotionally from one period to another. After Sara’s death in 1941, she reflected later on that at the time she did not seem emotional about her passing. Later on she seemed to amend those thoughts. Eleanor always gave the impression that she was more distracted emotionally from those closest to her and she seemed to transfer her love and emotion to others and other issues.

V.              From 1906-1916, she gives birth to six children, one dies in infancy.

a.     She has difficulty raising her large brood of children and her authority with them is divided, and possibly undercut by her mother-in-law. Is this a real conflict? No one knows for sure.

b.     She perceives that her children are spoiled and swayed by their grandmother, but this feeling and her subsequent recollections must be analyzed in the context of the times and with her emotional state.

She always considered her children more of her mother-in-law’s than her own. But in truth she was not a very good mother. She did not know how to raise children. She wasn’t raised properly herself, and she turned most of the work over to incompetent nannies who quite often were too strict and almost indifferent. In a sense they adopted the character of their mistress. On the other hand, Sara Delano was deeply concerned with her son’s future and happiness. (Eleanor always remembered that Sara had really opposed the union and they had been engaged secretly a year before their marriage.) This is a period of great challenge for Eleanor.

c.     FDR is working now in New York City as a lawyer at Carter, Ledyard and predicts that someday he will be Asst. Secretary of the Navy, a State Senator and Governor. He is also a distracted lawyer and after some indifferent years, he is looking at other interests.

d.     FDR is asked by Judge John Mack to run for office in Duchess County.

1.    FDR is elected to the State Senate 1910- in the GOP dominated district.

2.    They live in Albany, which she abhors.

3.    But she gains some independence from Sara but feels awkward as a politician’s wife

4.    She gets involved in state Democratic politics (he will never carry this district again!)

5.    Conflict starts with Alice Roosevelt Longworth and the Oyster Bay Roosevelt children over the future legacy of Theodore Roosevelt. The surviving sons, Quentin is killed in air combat in France during WWI, feel that Franklin Roosevelt is a usurper who has stolen the Roosevelt name and legacy, and the Alice, who is the same age as Eleanor, and is in a horrible marriage, becomes jealous of her cousin and the jealousy turns to hatred. During their early years together, as FDR’s political career developed, the rift between the two branches of the Roosevelt family began to grow and ever widen. The sons were jealous and the daughter Alice, who was a stepsister to her young brothers, becomes quite defensive regarding the political future and legacy of her father’s sons. FDR loved and respected TR, but he was from a different party and in 1912 FDR supported and worked hard for Woodrow Wilson who ran against both the GOP incumbent President William Howard Taft and TR who ran on the Progressive or Bull Moose line. Alice and her brothers never forgave Franklin for opposing their father. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life in Washington 1913-1920

 

I.                   After Wilson’s election FDR is rewarded with a post and the Roosevelts move to Washington in 1913.

a.     FDR is appointed Asst. Sec. of the Navy, like his cousin Theodore Roosevelt (There would 5 other Roosevelts who would hold this office.)

b.     After a rough start in the Capital, Eleanor develops her social skills as a Washington wife.

c.     WWI opens up new opportunities for ER

1.    She works for the Red Cross

2.    Becomes an advocate for hospital reform after witnessing the conditions of the wounded

3.    There are new social responsibilities thrust upon her as a wife of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy.

II.                The hot summer of 1918 brings new challenges to their marriage!

a.     Lucy Mercer was Eleanor’s social secretary. In 1917 Eleanor, after the birth of her sixth child, (the first Franklin Jr. died after a few months,) decided that she had fulfilled her wifely obligations and duty, and wanted not to be pregnant again. She therefore practiced the only birth control she knew, abstinence.  She subsequently moved out of Franklin’s bed and bedroom. FDR was 36 years old at the time, and since it was obvious the Roosevelt men were quite fertile, and his libido was more than adequate, a sexual shutdown by his wife did not bode well for the future of his marriage.

b.     She headed off to Campobello Island from the beastly hot summer Washington summer. Hard work, and problems arise with Lucy Mercer, a beautiful Catholic young woman from an old family that now is suffering from hard times. Even what and how it happened between them is really unknown. But an affair, not completely secret ensues. There is no doubt that there is a great amount of debate and conflict over what next happened and how the marriage was saved. Many accounts stated that Eleanor offered him a divorce. Other’s stated that she would only agree to reconciliation if FDR never talked to Lucy Mercer again. It is also said that Sara had backed Eleanor and had threatened to disinherit her son. This is mostly apocryphal. Lately it has been speculated that the so-called negotiations were not just between Sara and her son, but also with a much stronger Eleanor as an active participant. Sara Delano is seen here as a positive force in the salvation of their marriage. The age old argument was made to him possibly by Lois Howe that she a Catholic, would not marry a divorced man, and a divorced man with five children could never be considered for higher office.

 

III.             FDR’s run for the Vice-Presidency 1920 with James Cox

a.     Active campaign- speeches all over the country strain their marriage!

b.     They retreat to Campobello Island for escape after the disastrous loss!

IV.           Polio strikes FDR 1921

a.     Polio strikes at Campobello Island

Franklin Roosevelt was always plagued by illness. In a sense it is possible that his polio was brought on not only from his lowered resistance due to his long swim in the icy waters of the Bay of Fundy, or his run through the woods to a Boy Scout encampment, but from the stress he was possibly suffering at the time. It is possible that his stress level was quite high regarding the Newport homosexual scandal, of which he was accused of investigating with too much rigor.

b.     As a result of the ensuing health crisis, Eleanor develops a long friendship with Louis Howe, FDR’s confidante and alter ego. During this trying period, Louis Howe, FDR’s first true friend, helped Eleanor cope with FDR’s illness and disability. Whether his effort was completely altruistic or not, he was attached to FDR’s star and could not easily abandon it. He therefore helped her to learn how to speak in public, address and organize meetings and therefore bolstered her constantly damaged self-esteem.

 

The Dore Sharey stage and film treatment of FDR’s sickness, “Sunrise at Campobello,” is more fiction than fact. He was close to death, his future was touch and go and it was much more devastating to him and his family than it was depicted. His illness was first misdiagnosed and Eleanor’s attempt to massage life into his affected legs proved fruitless, counter-productive and extremely painful. In fact later medical opinion concluded that the excessive massaging permanently destroyed the muscles in his legs, and exacerbated his total condition. After the Roosevelt family attended the play on Broadway they shrugged it off as fiction. It reminds me of the story of Cole Porter, who went to see the Hollywood biopic of his life, titled “Night and Day” with Cary Grant in the lead role, and at the conclusion of the film Porter said, “great picture, not my life.”

 

During this time, before FDR returned to a period of almost physical normality, he was constantly away from his family. He retreated to both the warm waters, in a virtual state of abject depression, off South Carolina in his houseboat, the Larooco and to the rundown Warm Springs Resort. In these early days and months after his attack of polio, he was convinced that hydro-thermia therapy could cure his paralysis by re-invigorating his leg’s muscle tissue. Eleanor was left alone in NYC to raise her children. She only visited the houseboat and Warm Springs a few times in a period of around 30 months. During this period at Warm Springs, Missy LeHand became his housekeeper-hostess-secretary there. Eleanor hated Warm Springs, especially because of their Jim Crow social morays and laws. She visited there as little as possible. Later on, Missy LeHand, who had worked for FDR before he had been afflicted, became his trusted aide during his recovery, wound up in the same role in Albany. Eleanor was undoubtedly ambivalent about this arrangement-grateful to be relieved of the work and for sure was not resentful of another woman’s performance of her wifely duties.

 

Their relationship would be incredibly close until her stroke in 1941 after 20 years of selfless work

c.     While on her own, ER’s partnership with Howe helped to rehabilitate FDR’s political legacy and keep his political name alive.

d.     She begins to volunteer with progressive groups She developed her skills of organization and met with most of the prominent women in the State of NY that were involved in social issues, child welfare, child labor, living standards, housing, and women’s rights.

1.    Women’s City Club of NY

2.    Women’s Democratic Club of NY

3.    League of Women’s Voters

4.    National Consumer’s League

5.    Women’s Trade Union League

6.    NY and National Democratic Committees

7.    Active in Governor Al Smith’s campaigns

 

Life again in Albany 1928-1932

 

V.              By the mid 1920’s FDR enjoys partial recovery and starts to return to public life.

a.     FDR nominated Al Smith in 1924, the “Happy Warrior” speech, invests in Warm Springs as a rehabilitative center and continues to search for a cure to polio.

b.     He re-nominates Smith again for president in 1928.

c.     FDR himself nominated for Governor of NY in 1928, and elected in spite of a GOP national landslide. He didn’t seek the office and Eleanor was not sure she wanted him to run, but Smith begged him to do it. Smith wanted his help with the turnout in New York. Smith’s advisors worried about FDR becoming his rival and Smith told them, that he would not live another year. FDR won over Albert Ottinger (Dick Ottinger’s uncle) by only 25,000 votes, about one per precinct.

1.    As wife of the Governor she traveled the state as his “legs, eyes, and ears” and inspects everything. As the Governor’s wife she hones her skills at organizational work and meets with the most prominent women in the State of New York that are involved in social issues, child welfare, child labor, living standards, free milk programs, housing and women’s rights.

2.    Establishes important political and social contacts, and creates alliances, and friendships with Harry Hopkins, Rose Schneiderman, Caroline O’Day, Lillian Wald, of the Henry St. Settlement, and Florence Kelly of the Consumers Union,

d.     She is resolved to maintain her independence while Fiurst Lady of NY.

Missy LeHand, meanwhile, winds up assuming the same role she had in Warm Springs Eleanor was obviously happy that Missy was always there. This relationship with Missy would be incredibly close for twenty years of selfless work until her stroke in 1941 at age 46. LeHand was part of the original group that eventually passed from the scene, almost all worn out by the hectic pace of Washington life. Arthur Krock, the famous NY Times columnist had great respect for Missy and felt that she had as much to do with FDR’s conscience as did Eleanor. He said that they both “staked out to separate domains of great influence.” Missy lived on her own cottage at Hyde Park, lived also in the Executive Mansion and the White House. She not only did is correspondence, but had his power of attorney, managed the Roosevelt accounts, dined with the Roosevelts formally and informally. When Eleanor wanted to help him with his correspondence, he told her that Missy would feel insulted. After her stroke, FDR paid all of her bills and she was to be left half of his estate in his will. She never fully recovered, and was completely depressed by her debilitated condition and died in 1944. After her death, Eleanor arranged the funeral, which was presided over by Bishop (later Cardinal) Richard Cushing of Boston, Felix Frankfurter, Jim Farley, Joseph P. Kennedy and many, many others. Eleanor treated her like family, bought her clothes, gave her gifts and understood fully FDR’s dependency on her. FDR could never bear to speak of her after her illness.

e.     During those days she developed a furniture factory at Val-Kill- her only home, which is still located near the big mansion on the Post Road.

f.      She also founded the Todhunter School in NYC- with Marion Dickerman, and Nancy Cook.

These two activities enabled Eleanor to earn her own money, of which she did all her adult life, and to develop new friends and activities. She developed a long and close friendship with the nationally renowned reporter Lorena Hickock and received great personal pleasure from teaching at Todhunter.

g.     Lorena Hickock, Esther Lape, and their relationships

VI.           The crash of 1929, brings on the start of the Great Depression (1929-39)

VII.        At the end of his two-year term, FDR ran for re-election in 1930

a.     Wins in the greatest numerical landslide in history, 725,000 votes

b.     The Depression hits NY hard and he starts relief programs, with the help of Hopkins and Frances Perkins. He considers bid for the White House and within another year is considered the odds on favorite. After a contentious primary campaign which pitted him against his new bitter rival and enemy Al Smith and a raucous convention, he campaigns all over America and wins a landslide victory over Herbert Hoover.

 

Back to Washington 1933-39

 

I.                    Having to deal with the immense problems that have emerged from the crash and the economic collapse, FDR plans the establishment of the New Deal. Eleanor is basically shocked again by the next transition in her life. She feels her freedom is at an end and her life’s work is finished.

 

When the Roosevelts arrived in Washington in March of 1933, the country was in a free-fall. On the day of FDR’s inauguration, the country was on the verge of bankruptcy. They had a very somber celebration in an impoverished White House. The Oyster Bay Roosevelts and cousin Princess Alice were invited. Eleanor was shocked over FDR’s kindness to her spiteful and bitter cousin. Alice had made a career of mocking Eleanor and often did public exhibitions that included her imitating her voice and mocking her mannerisms. They were incredibly offensive and Eleanor was highly disturbed and offended by her. She demanded to know why FDR could have invited a person who so hated her. FDR calmed her down and literally said, “one gets more flies with honey than vinegar.” Alice Roosevelt Longworth was so stunned and surprised by this beau geste. She had not been invited back to the White since her father had been there in 1908. For that reason, Alice never again mocked Eleanor in public until after the death of FDR.

 

a.     ER sees that equality of opportunity is more important than “honest broker” government

1.    She supports vigorously aid to underprivileged groups

2.    Wants a social system based on individual rights

3.    Supports government’s role in furthering justice

b.     ER sees herself in a unique role as an intermediary between the average person and government

Eleanor again faced the great challenge of the abandonment of her private life and her new role as the First Lady. She started to see it as an opportunity to be an intimate lobbyist with her husband. She made sure that every day there were ideas and requests put in his mailbox.

c.     She is the first First Lady to have press conferences, makes speeches, writes columns, My Day, 1936

d.     She brings a long line of reformers to the White House

e.      She even fights with Cardinal Spellman over the “Establishment Clause.” Her support for Margaret Sanger (birth control) and the American Youth Congress.

 

II.          Establishes with Harry Hopkins a White House Conference on the needs of women.

            With the death of Louis Howe, Eleanor was able to make a strategic and philosophical alliance with Harry Hopkins.              

a.     By December 1933, the Civil Works Administration is employing 100,000 women

b.     Hopkins promises to hire 300,000 more in the next year

 

III.     She helps found the National Youth Administration

a.     Provides work opportunities to youth while in school

b.     She is very concerned that a whole generation of youth could turn from Democracy to fascism or communism

c.     She makes sure the homeless, transients and black youth are also helped.

One of the early leaders who came out of the National Youth Administration was the young Lyndon B. Johnson from Texas. Later on FDR would do many things for LBJ and eventually he capitalized on their relationship to further his ambitions in Texas politics

 

IV.           Forms alliances with American Youth Congress and American Students, Unions, and Civil Rights groups: 1936-40

a.     Groups advocating extensive social welfare

b.     Establishes uncompromising position on civil rights

c.     Tries to open New Deal to blacks, housing, jobs, education

Eleanor worked closely with Walter White the director of the NAACP and Mary McLeod Bethune, the founder of Bethune-Cookman College. Bethune became a friend of Eleanor’s in 1935, and was appointed by FDR to the Advisory Committee of the National Youth Administration. As the highest-ranking Black in the New Deal she met with FDR 6-7 times a year. Her group was known as the “Black Cabinet” and was a regular guest of Eleanor’s at the White House.

d.     Worked with Walter White, of the NAACP to sponsor anti-lynching legislation

Eleanor was always concerned with the underdog and the disadvantaged. She quickly gravitated to the issue of Civil Rights. Almost all of FDR’s Supreme Court justices worked hard to dismantle a century of law discriminating against Blacks and Eleanor Roosevelt. Even though filibusters killed two anti-lynching bills, lynching declined from 28 in 1933 to 2 in 1939.

After the DAR refused their permission to allow Marian Anderson to perform at Constitution Hall, Eleanor resigned from the DAR and with Harold Ickes help arranged a concert for the contralto at the Lincoln Memorial. She also resigned from a number of other clubs that discriminated.

e.     Strong advocate against Congressional efforts to cut funds from the WPA

f.      Works to protect school lunch programs, reform or welfare agencies

g.     Supports Loyalist (anti-clerical) faction in the Spanish Civil War who opposed General Franco.

 

World War II 1941-1945

 

I.                    Took on only official job during FDR’s presidency, the Deputy Director of Civilian Defense. After 6 months she resigned. The war put the New Deal on the backburner and FDR famously stated that he was changing his Dr. New Deal hat for his Dr. Win the War hat. Eleanor became again his eyes and ears and started an extensive cross-country trip to inspect working conditions at war plants.

When America entered the war all efforts were directed towards National Defense and building our ability to strike back at our enemies. In this way FDR coined the term “Arsenal of Democracy” and went about spectacularly. He promised and he delivered over 300,000 planes thousands of ships, and an unlimited number of tanks and small arms. He armed both Britain and Russia through Lend-Lease.

II.      She did extensive traveling around the USA from 1941-2.

At the start of the national emergency caused by beginning of WWII, the role of the New Deal and domestic liberalism started to wane as national security concerns became more acute. As the war proceeded, Eleanor wanted to visit the wounded in the Pacific. All the brass opposed her trip, but she insisted and FDR approved. Her visits were spectacular and later on all the Admirals agreed that her effort was second to none. The wounded were glad to see her and they knew that their messages to their loved ones and the government would be heard.

III.              She wrote and sent, with her staff, over 25,000 letters to the homes of the wounded.

 As the war dragged on, the pressure on him was immense, and his health started to suffer. His personal physician Admiral Ross McIntire brought in the young but renowned heart specialist Dr. Howard Bruenn in the spring of 1944. He found that FDR was suffering from high blood pressure, arteriosclerosis and an enlarged heart. He immediately went to work on him. In the meantime, FDR virtually begged Eleanor to return to the White House and help him out with his obligations. He wanted her to drop or suspend her other work and become once again his hostess, confidante and assistant. She had been gone to long, and did not want to give up her efforts and ideals. FDR had lost a great deal of his close advisors over this brutal period and needed help, distraction and relaxation. He finally asked his daughter Anna to serve in the White House in that role.

 

At this same time in 1944, and after the rejection from Eleanor, and the death of Winthrop Rutherford, he had his daughter arrange new meetings with Lucy Mercer Rutherford. She had always been discreetly invited to all of his inaugurations and had arranged her marriage with the rich, older and widowed Rutherford. There is no evidence that he had ever communicated with her, but he was always aware of her life, family and activities. In February of 1945, he was to embark on what turned out to be, his last foreign trip to Yalta. Eleanor wanted to go badly, but he made the excuse that Churchill was bringing his daughter and not his wife. I believe that he did not want to share the spotlight or felt that she would be lobbying with Churchill and Stalin over different issues. She was terribly disappointed. Therefore Anna went as his personal aide.

 

After his long trip, he was terribly worn down. After addressing Congress about his 12,000-mile journey to the Crimea, he headed for Warm Springs for some rest and recuperation. It was there at around 1:00 pm, while posing for an oil painting, he collapsed of a cerebral hemorrhage. Around him were his cousins, Laura, “Aunt Polly” Delano, Margaret “Daisy” Suckley, the artist Elizabeth Shoumatoff, his household staff and Lucy Mercer Rutherford who had commissioned the painting. At 3:35 the 32nd President of the United States was gone. Eleanor was called at the Sulgrave Club where she was having lunch next to Mrs. Woodrow Wilson, and was asked to return quickly to the White House by Press Secretary Steve Early. After an anxious cab ride back to the White House, and while upstairs in a sitting room surrounded by 100’s of family photos, the news, she dreaded, was broken to her by Early and Dr. McIntire. She was shocked on one hand, but not insanely surprised. She got her bags together and immediately rode to Union Station and got a train to Georgia. It was not an easy trip. When she arrived at his home, she, then and there, learned how he was stricken and who was there. 

 

V1.   The news that Lucy Mercer was there was a great shock to her and it opened an immense rift with daughter Anna. Did she wonder to herself whether she did enough in his final year? Of course she was told by one of FDR’s cousins, the “Handmaidens,” as Eleanor referred to them. Eleanor contained her rage. The cousins may not have known the real story of FDR and Lucy Mercer, few did, and in her diaries Daisy Suckley never seemed aware of FDR’s earlier involvement with Lucy. When Eleanor learned that her daughter, who had known all the time about the affair, had arranged their meeting she was livid. She confronted her, and her daughter claimed that her father needed someone and this inferred that Eleanor had not been there. It was a long time before Eleanor forgave her and they talked again.

 

Life after FDR and the Post War World 1945-1952

 

I.                   After FDR’s death, Eleanor’s post-war work was a reform agenda consistent with her philosophy of the 1930’s. After a period of mourning and public and private grief, she got involved with her projects that had preceded the war. She went ahead even though she really perceived and believed that at age 61 her public career was over and she would be soon forgotten.

 

II.                Eleanor saw the need for a more radical approach to domestic problems

a.     She advocated and demanded desegregation in housing education, and other public facilities

b.     She demanded social justice for minorities

c.     She gegan to lobby President Truman about injustice at home and abroad.

 

III.             Truman then appoints he to be a delegate to the UN

a.     Lobbies for and writes Universal Declaration of Human Rights (The Magna Charta for Mankind) She put her heart and soul into this project. Of course it was FDR who had envisioned the birth of the United Nations, who had coined the term and had designed its organization. He had planned to address its opening in May of 1945 in San Francisco. She incorporated FDR’s concept and ideals first expressed in his Four Freedoms address in January of 1941, and his Second Bill of Rights concept.

b.     Becomes vocal advocate of Israeli statehood- traveled there with Ruth Gruber and was influenced to support the country through her friendship with Dr. David Gurewitsch.

c.     Works to contain the proliferation of nuclear arms

d.     Supports the US containment approach to the growing Soviet menace

e.     After Eisenhower’s election, and it seems by the insistence of the new Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, the ungrateful President fires her.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Later Years 1953-62

 

I.                   Stays active in politic life: supports Adlai Stevenson campaigns for President and even supports him at the 1960 DNC Convention in San Francisco.

II.                Writes column and makes hundreds of speeches

a.     Insists on Universal Human Rights

b.     Fights for Civil Rights in America

c.     Speaks out against McCarthyism

d.     Fights for social justice

She travels the world as an unofficial ambassador. She is nicknamed by Truman, “The First Lady of the World.” And it sticks forever. She stays friendly with Dr. David Gurewitsch and his future wife Edna. She is welcomed everywhere with open arms and great fanfare and adulation.

 

He last 17 years are remarkable for the welcome she is given. Her life over those years becomes the greatest life ever lived, with the greatest amount of respect imaginable. Her friendships are everywhere; she is welcomed into every home, institution, school and country. Every door was opened and every honor awarded. She was awarded 35 honorary doctorates, even four more than given her illustrious husband.

 

III.             Appointed by JFK to head Presidents Commission on the Status of Women

 

A.   An early member of Brandeis University, Board of Trustees

B.   Received 35 honorary degrees, compared to 31 for FDR. Received the first honorary degree offered by Russell sage College.

C.   Ranked #1 for 15 consecutive years as the “World’s Most Popular Woman,” from 1946-61.

 

But with all of that, it is interesting that she seemed never to find love and fulfillment from those closest to her. She never had it from her parents, or grandmother, and was hurt and disappointed with her husband, who really truly always loved her. She felt inhibited and dominated by her mother-in-law, who really was one of her great supporters. She was disappointed and quite often estranged from her children and disappointed and embarrassed by their numerous failed marriages. She often blamed herself for their problems. Of course it is never easy being the children of famous parents. Also FDR’s illness, and his intense focus on his own recovery, left her alone to cope with five children, with ages from four to fifteen. Later on his public life and ambition along with his responsibilities regarding the aftermath of the crash, the Depression, the recovery and the Second World War did not make her role as a mother easier. He was pretty much absent as a father over the last 25 years of his life.

 

With all this in mind, she seemed to seek out strong emotional bonds with others. Over the years her name was associated with her NY State trooper bodyguard, Marian Dickerson, Nancy Cook, Lorena Hickock, Malvina Thompson, Joseph Lash, Bishop William Levy and David Gurewitsch.

 

Beyond her direct and indirect influence, Eleanor Roosevelt has survived as a symbol in the realm of American and international politics and reform. Her achievements remain as an inspiration to fighters for equality, social justice, civil rights, and civil liberties in the United States and abroad.

 

Eleanor Roosevelt said, “A mature person is one who does not think only in absolutes, who is able to be objective even when deeply stirred emotionally, who has learned that there is both good and bad in all people and in all things, and who walks humbly and deals charitably with the circumstances of life, knowing that in this world no one is all knowing and therefore all of us need both love and charity.”

 

 

 

Books by Eleanor Roosevelt:

My Day

This is My Story

This I Remember

On My Own

It’s Up to The Women

Ladies of Courage

Tomorrow Is Now

The Moral Basis Of Democracy

This Troubled World

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Vassar Temple, Robert Rosen and Setting the Record Straight 2-25-07

 

The Vassar Temple, Robert Rosen and Setting the Record Straight!

February 25, 2007

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

It’s a cold gray day in the Hudson River Valley, and the threat of snow hovers over all the travelers, on their hurried way, along the Taconic River Parkway. Long ago, I planned to go north to Poughkeepsie to hear Mr. Robert Rosen speak about Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I had made contact with him many months ago after reading his important book, Saving the Jews, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Holocaust.

 

Mr. Rosen, who is from Charleston, South Carolina, and not related to the Rosens on my wife’s side of the family, and I, started talking in August of 2006. We exchanged a number of emails and we eventually had a few phone conversations. I was decently familiar with Charleston, a lovely city, whose harbor contains the famous Fort Sumter and Hyman’s Seafood Restaurant, located at 215 Meeting Street. We had been there in the fall of 2004 and during a conversation with one of the owners, Eli Hyman, the subject of “Jewish Politics” came up. Of course, one of the sub-contexts of our conversation and my subsequent letter to him was the role of FDR vis-à-vis immigration in the 1930’s. This part of what I wrote him on October 24, 2004.

 

“FDR had to balance many, many interests at one time. During the period between 1933 and 1938 over half the immigrants to the United States were Jewish, far above the quotas allowed for Germany and Austria. The “quota issue” became a hot button in Congress and the conservative FDR haters in that body threatened the termination of all quotas. Therefore many Jews reached the US through non-legal channels. The government tended to look the other way, when it could, regarding this “underground” immigration. In regards to more “public” immigration process, like the “Oswego” community that involved a tiny amount of people (8000), the Jews were interned for basically the duration of the war and for public “show”. Therefore the public “saw” that Jewish immigration was not being “prejudicially” favored. But realistically many hundreds of thousands of Jews found there way to America. But remember public opinion and Congressional pressure was totally against immigration and especially Jewish immigration. Also, at that same time, a vast majority of Jews left Germany (over 75% of the pre-war 500,000, or less than 1% of the population), assuming it would be until Hitler was overthrown or contained. Most went or were forced to Poland and other countries to the East and many went to France, Holland and other western European countries including England. But of course history proved that they weren’t secure outside of Germany, as long as they were within the grasp of the Nazi military.

 

The bottom line to this all is that the Jews did not face extermination in Germany between 1933- and the start of WWII. Even up to Kristalnacht, in late 1938, only a few thousand Jews had even been interned in camps no less executed.  Many of the Jews that remained in Germany still thought that this “political” problem would “all blow over.” Many Jews did not want to give up their property, and their ancestral homes.”

 

As one readily can see, and most know, this subject has been disturbing to many members of the Jewish community, here and abroad. The lingering question in many minds, was why weren’t more Jews let into the United States? Did the Roosevelt Administration and FDR do enough to help immigration and escape to the west? Why wasn’t the German ocean liner Saint Louis and its 900+ passengers allowed into the United States? Finally, did the Allies know of Auschwitz, and could it have been bombed out of existence? These are all daunting questions which I have studied, like many other scholars and non-scholars, for decades. There are many answers that for some, like myself, are quite plausible when framed in the context of history. Many books have been written on the subject and of course to many, the one great paradox will always remain. Why Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a virtual god to the Jewish community, could seemingly be oblivious to their needs in such a crucial moment? In that sense, that is why Robert Rosen’s book is so important. For many of us he has started to “set the record straight.”

 

Of course in retrospect, President Harry S Truman, FDR’s successor, who is revered by the Jewish community to this day, was in reality no real friend the Jews. His help with Israel’s recognition, seen in the harsh light of political necessity is understood. Truman was a pragmatist that brought German scientists into America and also allowed many from the Nazi intelligence machinery to enter America without an iota of conscience or a question of morality: pure bottom line Cold War politics. Please note some of Truman’s observations on Jews and the Holocaust.

 

In fact, Harry S Truman, (1884-1972, President of the United States 1945-53) a man revered by many Jews as a great friend of the Jewish people and the one who recognized the State of Israel, was from a virulently anti-Semitic background. Even though he had a Jewish partner in the haberdashery business, named Eddie Jacobson, (1891-1955) he was never far from his anti-Semitic roots, as his letters attest. He had only a “cordial relationship with Jacobson- but (later) needed Jews for the 1948 nomination.” (Harry Truman and the Crisis Presidency, Bert Cochran, Harper & Row, 1973, page 96)

 

Even Truman, when President, was told of the vast, but still generally hidden evidence of the massive killing machines of the “death camps,” initially stated, that “the Jews brought it upon themselves!” (Recently quoted from an article by William Safire, in The NY Times in the summer of 2003.)

 

Of course Truman also said “The Jews claim G-d Almighty picked ‘em out for special privilege. Well I’m sure he had better judgment. Fact is I never thought G-d picked any favorites.” (Off the Record– The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, edited by Robert Ferrell- Penguin Books, 1980, page 41.)

 

“Miami is nothing but hotels, filling stations, Hebrews and cabins.” (Truman, by David McCullough, Simon and Shuster, 1992, page 286)

 

Bluma Jacobson, Eddie’s wife said “Eddie and I were never at the Truman’s house.” (Plain Speaking, by Merle Miller, GP Putnam, 1973)

 

“Truman courts the Jews, and had David Bernstein, a prominent Zionist (from Missouri) on the 1948 campaign committee.”  (Harry Trumanand the Crisis Presidency, Bert Cochran, Harper & Row, 1973, page 96).

 

“Truman had grown weary of the constant pressure exerted by the American Zionists. Truman announced he no longer believed in resolution aiming at the creation of a Jewish State.” (A History of Zionism, by Walter Laqueur, Holt-Rinehart, 1972, page 570.) And of course this was after Truman had learned of the disaster of the Holocaust.

 

Therefore, Robert Rosen and I have some common interests regarding Franklin Roosevelt’s legacy. Mr. Rosen is a successful 59 year-old lawyer, who has written books on a number of subjects, which include the following: The Jewish Confederates, A Short History of Charleston and Confederate Charleston.  Rosen, who was educated at the University of Virginia, received an MA at Harvard and a law degree at the University of South Carolina, got interested in the subject of FDR and Jewish immigration in a visit to Boston. There is a Holocaust Memorial in that wonderful town, right near the Quincy Market. It is across the street from the famous Union Oyster House, where Daniel Webster quaffed oysters and brandy. It is where I have also eaten many cherrystones and have quenched my own thirst with Sam Adams Lager. It seems Mr. Rosen, while strolling along the memorial with his daughter, saw an inscription mentioning that in 1942 the United States and the Allies knew of the “Death Camps” and did nothing about it. Of course this was inaccurate, misleading, and Mr. Rosen was infuriated. Ironically, this past December, my son Jon and I were walking in the same exact spot, just after visiting the bar at the Union Oyster House, and read the same inscription. I had also read it once or twice before. I commented to Jon that the inscription was inaccurate and an out and out falsehood. Americans and the Allies knew that there were a lot of Jews being killed in 1942. They also were unaware of specific “Death Camps,” per say, did not know therefore of their locations, and for sure were in no position to do anything about them. Jon then told me that that inscription was Robert Rosen’s inspiration to find out the truth and write his book.

 

When Rosen’s book came out and I read it along with another book by one Robert Beir, entitled, FDR and the Holocaust. Robert Beir’s book was a confusing retrospective regarding American Jewry’s response to the tragedy, we would later know as the Holocaust, and a mixed-up and inconsistent evaluation regarding FDR’s role. Beir, on one hand, adored FDR then (he’s 89 years old now) and now, but it took almost 300 pages of vacillating between criticism and idolatry to get to his final summation.

 

He stated on pages 269 and 270 the following:

 

The Jewish organizations in America were involved in internecine warfare, each going in different direction. The Yiddish newspaper, the Yiddisher Kemfer found it unfathomable that the “chief organizations in America Jewry… could not in this dire hour, unequalled in human history, unite for the purpose of seeking ways to forestall the misfortune or at least to reduce its scope…” Other than Henry Morganthau, the Jewish advisors around Roosevelt did not press for rescue. This makes for a bitter legacy.

 

Of course he cites the Jewish ownership of the NY Times, and says  “…from 1939 through 1945, (The Times) printed 1,186 Holocaust stories, or an average of 17 stories per month. And yet, only 26 stories mentioning the discrimination, deportation and destruction” of the Jews made the front pages. And of those stories, only six identified Jews as the primary victim. “

 

Again, Beir on page 270 mentions that “ this is primarily a Roosevelt story, let us end with the protagonist. He was not an anti-Semite. He was not responsible for the Holocaust. He believed, as we had read over and over again, that the best way to say Jewish lives was to defeat Nazi Germany. His commitment to that belief never wavered.”

 

Beir, in a confused way, throws “bricks and bouquets” at the same time upon the Jewish community and President Roosevelt. He had all the benefits life could offer, but was an early victim of discrimination and like many his age, a great and life-long admirer of FDR.

 

Therefore when I started to read Robert Rosen’s book, I was curious to see how he dealt with the same issues. But for sure, no matter what one individual believes, there is no doubt that the American Jewish community was divided. Every credible student of history, and this issue, specifically knows that no people speak with one voice. In the case of immigration, many old-line German Jews were fearful always of unlimited Jewish immigration from Eastern Europe. They feared that Jewish immigration from Eastern Europe would exacerbate American anti-Semitism. Many nominally supported Zionist yearnings and wanted these Jews to immigrate to Palestine and set up a Jewish Homeland. There were other Jewish groups who supported any effort to rescue any and all Jews and, were not particularly interested in Palestine. There were others who were active Zionists who supported groups like the Irgun and followers of Jabotinsky who recommended armed insurrection against British rule and even the physical expulsion of indigenous Arabs from the Mandate area. Besides these individuals who were more active politically, there were millions of American Jews who were poor, politically powerless, and still recovering from the Depression and not cognizant of the issues regarding Jewish persecution and Zionist politics. Many of these people were assimilated Jews who were struggling to be treated as equals with regards to jobs, housing, education and public accommodations. The arguments, between the various interest groups regarding foreign policy, were not paramount in their minds. They looked at Franklin D. Roosevelt as their personal advocate. They voted for him in overwhelming numbers. They represented 90% of the Jewish vote. The question, therefore is, which Jews made up the 10%?

 

After finishing his book, I believed that he had written the book that I always wanted to author myself. Upon visiting Hyde Park on January 30, 2007, the 125th anniversary of FDR’s birth I wrote this email to Jonathan Alter, the Newsweek columnist and author of an excellent book FDR and the Defining Moment and forwarded a copy to Robert Rosen.

 

 

Noting the occasion of the upcoming 125th Anniversary of the birth of Franklin Delano Roosevelt on January 30th.

 

I read Robert Rosen's masterful book, and we have talked many times about his work. I sent him my paper on “FDR and the Jewish Community” and he graciously said “you should have written this book 10 years earlier!” I'll be up there and I hope that his book will eventually reverse the FDR hater's effort to continue to sully his great name and legacy. Any one who is interested in this most important period of history should get his book and learn the real truth regarding FDR's efforts for Jewish survival and humanity's triumph. James McGregor Burn's calling FDR the “Soldier of Freedom” was right on the money decades ago. Without FDR, the author of the “Four Freedoms,” the “Atlantic Charter,” and “Lend-Lease,” the architect of the “Arsenal of Democracy,” the creator of the United Nations, and the leader of the Free World, we would not be here today. No man in history, in the words of Winston Churchill, who was referring to the RAF's heroic defense of England, in the Battle of Britain, could be more associated with his quote, “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.” In that sense humanity owes its survival in a world of light, as opposed to darkness, to the “few” of whom one, Franklin Delano Roosevelt stands out above all. 

 

As Churchill stated in a speech to the House of Commons on April 17, 1945, “He (FDR) died in harness, and we may well say in battle harness, like his soldiers, sailors and airman, who side by side with ours are carrying their task to the end all over the world. What an enviable death was his.”

 

Of course in honor of his birth, one must also recall again Winston Churchill who said, “Franklin Roosevelt was the greatest man he had ever known.” President Roosevelt's life, he said must be regarded as “one of the commanding events of human destiny.”

 

Richard

 

You can read my essay FDR and the Jewish Community at https://www.richardjgarfunkel.com/blog

 

 

Of course this brings us up today’s trip. One can reach Poughkeepsie by traveling north on the Taconic Parkway, approximately 44 miles, until reaching NY State Road, Route 55. I turned west towards the Hudson and headed through LaGrange, and within 7 miles, or so, I was in the heart of Poughkeepsie.

 

Poughkeepsie, which is the capital of Duchess County, where Hyde Park is located (9 miles up Route 9), was founded in 1687 and incorporated as a city in 1854. For a short time it was the capital of New York (1777) and its population (in 2000) of 29,871 is only slightly more that it was in 1900 (24,029). The Poughkeepsie Journal is the 3rd oldest newspaper in the United States and it is the home to Vassar and Marist Colleges.

 

Once into the city I found my way to Hooker Street, not far from the campus of Vassar College. Vassar founded in 1861, is one of the most selective colleges in the United States, ranked 12th in the US News and World Report liberal art college survey, and was the first of Seven Sisters to go coed in 1991. On the occasion of FDR’s 124th Birthday in 2006 and my visit to his gravesite, I wrote this selection from a piece about FDR and Vassar.

 

So I stood there with others, and listened to the keynote address by 87-year-old Ms. Elizabeth Daniels, the Vassar historian who told us what good neighbors the Roosevelt’s were to Vassar College. FDR was asked to be a trustee of the college in 1923 while he was still practically bed-ridden with the effects of polio. He would be a great friend of the college and a trustee (honorary 1933-45) until his death in 1945. Ms. Daniels, who graduated Vassar in 1941, remembered fondly the many times she heard Mrs. Roosevelt speak at the college, and few times she personally met the President. It was a moving and personal recollection of those far removed times. The fifth President of Vassar, Henry Noble McCrackan (1915-46) was a pacifist who had opposed both World War I and World War II. But a vast majority of the faculty (over 125), under the leadership of Dean Mildred Thompson, signed a personal letter to the President commending his efforts up and to the start of the war. After the start of the war Vassar’s president came on board wholeheartedly. But the cordial relationship between McCrackan, that had started in 1923 and had been nurtured during and up to the late 1930s and the President, was never the same.

 

The Vassar Temple is located at 140 Hooker Street and has been a Reform Jewish congregation since 1848. At its centennial in 1948, former Treasury Secretary, Mr. Henry Morgenthau Jr., was the honorary Chairperson of the event. So it was here that I found Robert Rosen and many members of that illustrious synagogue. The building itself is an unobtrusive modern structure that obviously is not original home of the congregation. A beautiful ark dominates the sanctuary, with a velvet red covered podium that overlooks the rows of wooden seats in its large sanctuary. Eleanor Roosevelt visited the Temple in 1954 and Henry Morganthau Jr. was a member. In fact, I was pointed out where he sat when he had attended services.

 

It was here that I saw our host, Frederica “Fritzie” Goodman, a native of Poughkeepsie, and a founding member of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute. Along with Ms. Goodman were Mr. Chris Breiseth, the former President of Wilkes College, and the President Emeritus of FERI, and Ms. Cynthia Koch the Director of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library. In November of 2004, Linda and I visited Little Rock, Arkansas, and went to the official opening of the Clinton Presidential Library. Linda and I attended a symposium at the University of Arkansas, Little Rock campus, on presidential libraries. This is what I wrote, at the time, about our meeting with Cynthia Koch.

 

We finished up our business and then got directions to University Street and the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Linda had found a symposium on presidential libraries and had gotten us tickets.  We found the school, parked, found the right building and located ourselves in the front row. The symposium included all of the heads of the 10 current Presidential libraries. Of course, to our surprise (not really) and delight, Cynthia Koch, the director of the FDR Library, was one of the participants. She looked down at us and asked, “What are you doing here?” All of the directors got a chance to speak about the libraries and how they were established. That was a unique experience and from our perspective, never to be duplicated. After it was over, Linda and I said hello to Cynthia, and talked about our visit. We also met the director of the JFK Library that is located in Charlestown. Dana, our daughter, had worked at the JFK Library when she was in graduate school in Boston. Anyone who has a chance should visit both libraries, which are easily within driving distance of New York. They are both great!

 

Along side Cynthia and Fritzi Goodman was Robert Rosen, whom I had never met in person, but I had talked to him many times on the phone, and with whom I had exchanged numerous emails. He was astounded that I had made the trip, was surprised I was so big, and thought that I was a bit younger than he was. How polite. I told him that I was a few years older, but stayed young by playing tennis and keeping active in politics. The latter may keep one younger, but certainly grays one’s hair.

 

Meanwhile the proceedings were promised to start at 2:30 pm and they did. Rabbi Paul Golomb welcomed us all to the Vassar Temple and invited Ms. Goodman to start the program. She spoke for a moment or so, and brought Mr. Chris Breiseth to the podium to introduce Robert Rosen. The audience was made up of 50 to 60 middle-aged and older folk who had come to listen.

 

Mr. Rosen gave a detailed and impassioned defense regarding the roll American Jewry played in trying to alert America to the plight of Europe’s Jews and reviewed some important aspects of his book, which were the story of the German ocean liner the Saint Louis and it voyage to Cuba and back again to England and Antwerp. With regards to the continued spate of misinformation about that ship, I wrote a letter to the Jewish Chronicle of Westchester.

 

Letter to the Editor

The Westchester Jewish Chronicle

 

January 5, 2007

 

In the January issue of the “Chronicle”, Ms. Rhea Tauber wrote a column titled “Memories of Cuba as a Haven for Jews.” Unfortunately her memory is a bit clouded and her facts are incorrect. The German ship, “St. Louis” was one of three ships that brought passengers, including Jews, to Cuba at that time. Cuba, because of the influence of local Nazis, put onerous restrictions on Jewish immigration. Already 6000 Jews immigrants were living in Cuba, most without legal documentation. Also a house-to-house check was being made for all German refugees and there was great fear from the Joint Distribution Committee in the United States that a pogrom was being planned if more Jews were granted asylum. When a $500 cash bond was put up for each passenger, amounting to $500,000, the Cubans refused. There were definitive conflicts between Batista and Manuel Benitez, who was receiving bribes for each illegal alien allowed into Cuba. Strongman Colonel Fulgencio Bastista wanted his “cut” or would end the practice. Two other ships had already just arrived, the British ship “Orduna” and the French ship, “Flanders.”  Within a twenty-four hour period more than 1200 refugees had arrived from three European ports.

 

The Cubans had just passed a law limiting to 1500 the number of immigrants that could be yearly allowed to land. Eventually, after a collapse in negotiations, the ship left port and while off Florida, on June 4, the figurehead President Bru relented and said that they could land for $650 per head. The Joint Committee refused to pay the extra dollars. They thought there would be more ships and the price would continue to escalate. The “St. Louis,” amidst all of the negotiation with Cuban and the American officials, who were trying to get around our strict immigration laws, turned seaward to Germany.

 

The JDC was besieged with criticism from the American Jewish community and its friends, but felt the Cubans were blackmailing them. Ms. Tauber stated that the passengers were “returned to Germany and certain death for all abroad.” She also stated that that “…Jews trying to escape the Holocaust, came into Havana harbor.”  Of the 936 Jews on board who had left Hamburg, 29 disembarked in Havana, 907 sailed back to Europe; 288 disembarked in England and lived through the Holocaust. The remaining 619 went to France, Belgium and Holland. The 392 of 619, who had disembarked at Antwerp, survived the war. The Nazis murdered the remaining 227. The US Holocaust Museum estimates more than two-thirds of the passengers survived the war. Also, in June of 1939, it certainly was not yet the Holocaust. War had not been declared, over 75% of the Jews living in Germany, at the time of Hitler's ascendancy to power, had either left Germany or had been forced out. German policy was “Judenrein” not extermination.

 

Up until Kristalnacht under 1000 Jews had been killed in Germany from 1933 until late 1938. Even up until the war, which started on September 3, 1939, relatively a small percentage of the remaining Jews from the 1930 population of 500,000 had been killed. The Holocaust really emerged from a number of distinct occurrences. The first was the invasion and conquering of Poland, and the fact that millions of Jews in Poland came under the direct control of the Nazis. The second would be the invasion and conquering of the Baltic States and the siege of the Soviet Union, where millions of other Jews came under Nazi control, and third would be the Wannsee Conference, in a Berlin suburb, on January 12, 1942 where the “Final Solution” was articulated and planned. By that time, no power on earth could have saved the vast majority of 6 million or so Jews that were eventually killed. In June of 1939, few in Europe really believed there would be war, no less World War. Few Jews, outside of Germany, thought their lives were eminently at risk, and the Low Countries and France were not invaded until the spring of 1940. Most Jews believed that Germany only was interested in ridding itself of Jews. But, it is true, that many Jews wished fervently to get out of Europe. These are incontrovertible facts reported in numerous histories of that era.

 

Of course, Mr. Rosen was able to explain to all of us the above story in his own words. In essence, the Roosevelt Administration along with the JDC, or the “Joint Committee” worked hard to get these Jews into friendly countries and not back to Germany. Again, we were not at war, the Holocaust was years away, and the United States was not a country that was looking favorably on immigration. In fact, our State Department, without FDR’s direct knowledge, was antagonistic to immigration, and especially Jewish immigration.

 

Mr. Rosen states on page 102, of his book that with all of the JDC’s and the Roosevelt Administration’s efforts, the following was true:

 

“One condition on which the passengers were permitted to enter these four countries (Great Britain, Holland, France and Belgium) was that their say would be temporary and that efforts would be made to effect their permanent immigration to another country. More than 700 of the refugees had affidavits and other documents for visas to the United States, and many already had their quota number to enter. They would have come to America but for the advent of war in September 1939.”

 

In other words, it wasn’t easy for any immigrants to enter any country illegally. Roosevelt and the JDC were working behind the scenes to get these people legally into the country, and at the same time avoid the criticism that they were being put ahead of everyone else. This would show to the American people that the administration was focused first on American security and defense!

 

Why was this necessary? Mr. Rosen describes the atmosphere of America when the subject of Lend-Lease came to Congress as Bill 1776. On page 153 he says:

 

“Lindbergh testified in Congress against Lend-Lease. Unmoved by the plight of France and Britain, the American celebrity was completely out of touch with political reality. He and his anti-Roosevelt friends on the American First Committee trumpeted the idea that a strong Germany was in America’s interest as a bulwark against communism. Remarkably, many in America agreed. Thousands of students at Yale cheered Lindbergh when he spoke in October 1940. The Nazis, of course supported the efforts of the America First Committee.”

 

Of course, Mr. Rosen also described Roosevelt’s response to American bigotry, on page 164.

 

“Roosevelt’s response to American anti-Semitism was to equate anti-Semitism with disloyalty. He gave FBI director J. Edgar Hoover enlarged powers to fight anti-Semitic groups.”

 

“Acting secretly and cautiously at first, but with increasing determination, Roosevelt and Hoover discredited and destroyed the anti-Semitic right and the American Fascist and Nazi movements by portraying them as fifth columnists, dupes of foreign powers, and traitors.

 

“Roosevelt and Hoover took on Father Coughlin, FBI agents infiltrated the Christian Front, and fourteen men were indicted for sedition. When Coughlin defended them, he lost credibility even though they were all acquitted. Other Catholics revealed that Coughlin was financed by the Nazis, Harassed by federal agents and finally abandoned by the Catholic Church hierarchy, the Radio Priest was driven of the radio by 1942.”

 

The last point Mr. Rosen raised was the dispute over the so-called request to bomb Auschwitz and all the misinformation that surrounds that dark chapter in world history.

I wrote about this issue in 2004:

 

With regard to the issue of possible allied bombing of “death camps,” in retrospect, there is no evidence that either the bombing of Auschwitz would have ended the killing or even retarded it. Mainstream Jewish opinion was against the bombing of the those facilities even after they were identified as “death camps’ rather than as “work camps.”  Only President Roosevelt or General Eisenhower could have ordered the bombing and there is no record of any kind that indicates that either one was ever asked to issue such an order, even though Jewish leaders of all persuasion had clear access to them both. In a similar vein, the bombing raids on the IG Farben/Monowitz production plants succeeded in hitting only 2.2% of the targeted buildings. Gilbert points out that the details and the secret nature of Auschwitz and even its name were not confirmed until the escape of two prisoners in April 1944, two years after the murderous process had begun. It would be folly to believe that FDR was besieged by Jewish leaders, led by Secretary Morgenthau, urging him to bomb Auschwitz. In fact no mainstream Jewish leader or organization made that request. On August 9, 1944, the first such request came to John McCloy, (1895-1989) the Assistant Secretary of War (1941-5), regarding the bombing of Auschwitz, by Leon Kubowitzki, head of the Rescue Committee of the World Jewish Congress, in which he forwarded, without endorsement, a request from Mr. Ernest Frischer of the Czechoslovak State Council (in London exile.) Ironically Mr. Kubowitzki argued against the bombing of Auschwitz because “the first victims will be Jews.” With regard to whether John McCloy ever actually asked FDR about the bombing, there is no evidence of any meeting and no evidence in any of his extensive interviews or in his personal papers that the subject was brought up. But, in a recent book, The Conquerors by Michael Beschloss, he asserts that John McCloy had told Henry Morgenthau III, that he had asked FDR about bombing the camps.

 

“By early June, when over one-third of the remaining Hungarian Jewish community had been deported to Auschwitz, Jacob Rosenheim, a leader of the world’s orthodox Jews, and others wrote Morgenthau, the War Department and Joseph Pehle of the War Refugee Board imploring them to bomb the railway lines from Hungary to the death camp at Auschwitz.” Joseph Pehle, who was a great advocate for the Jews, wrote McCloy expressing his doubts about the about bombing of Auschwitz. The War Refugee Board determined that the bombing of the tracks would do little to stop the killing, because they would be swiftly repaired. Later McCloy used about the same language and rationale to veto any further requests to bomb Auschwitz itself. (The Conquerors, by Michael Beschloss, page 64.)

 

For decades after World War II, McCloy insisted that he had never talked to the President on that subject. He told Washington Post reporter Morton Mintz in 1983 that he never talked with FDR about the subject.  Even David Wyman in his 1984 book, The Abandonment of the Jews, wrote that the bombing requests “almost certainly” did not reach Roosevelt. Later McCloy, in an interview in 1986, three years before his death, had an unpublished exchange with Henry Morgenthau III, who was researching his book, Mostly Morganthaus, claimed that he had spoken to FDR about the bombing of Auschwitz, Supposedly FDR “made it very clear” to him that the bombing would do no good, and “we would have been accused of destroying Auschwitz by bombing these innocent people.” Of course McCloy was telling this to Morgenthau’s son, decades after his father, Henry Jr. had referred to him as an “oppressor of the Jews.” Maybe McCloy’s true feelings were exposed when he also stated to Morganthau’s son, “I didn’t want to bomb Auschwitz…It seemed to be a bunch of fanatic Jews who deemed that if you didn’t bomb, it was an indication of lack of venom against Hitler…” (The Conquerors, Michael Beschloss, page 65-7.)

 

Of course the reading of the aforementioned transcript of the McCloy-Morgenthau interview nowhere mentions any conversation regarding the request to bomb Auschwitz!

(Comments on Michael Beschloss’ The Conquerors, by William vanden Heuval) The exact quote was the following

 

 Henry Morgenthau III: “But didn’t he ‘Morgenthau’ get involved in the bombing of Auschwitz that was all ex post facto.

 

John McCloy: “They came to me and wanted me to order the bombing of Auschwitz. He ‘Morgenthau’ wasn’t involved in that nor was the President…”

 

Auschwitz was raised peripherally as the conversation with Mr. McCloy was about to end. He was 88 years old –never in all of the extensive interviews he gave in his life, nor in his papers, is there any indication of his ever discussing the bombing question with the President. Henry Morgenthau III never cited the interview in the family memoir nor in his frequent public appearances in discussions relating to the Holocaust.” (Comments on the Michael Beschloss’ The Conquerors, by William vanden Heuval.)

 

David Ben-Guriun, (1886-1973, Prime Minister of Israel 1949-63) the Chairman of the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem, and later the first Prime Minister of Israel, in June of 1944, responded to a proposal that the Allies be asked to bomb the extermination camps. At a meeting presided over by Ben-Gurion, the Jewish Agency voted eleven to one against the bombing proposal.

 

There is no doubt that according to intelligent reports, “It is clear from this analysis that nothing was known by those (Allied Combined Intelligence Unit who prepared a Top Secret report on the principal sites of German synthetic oil production. At Auschwitz-Monowitz, it was clear, ‘progress has been made with the construction’ of the Buna plant.”) who made it of the purpose, or role of Birkenau and it’s sidings.” (Auschwitz and the Allies, by Martin Gilbert, Henry Holt, 1981, page 331.)

 

In other words there were many air reconnaissance photos taken over the area that included Auschwitz, and there were also numerous raids, late in 1944, directed at the various known industrial plants in the near vicinity, like the synthetic oil production plant at Monowitz. But unfortunately when Allied long-range bombers were able to make flights from our airbase in Foggia, Italy, with log-range fighter support, they were unaware of what was going on down below in the “death camps.” Could they then have bombed the marshalling yards at Birkenau? Yes, they could have, but by that time all activity had really ceased and the Germans by November 29, 1944 were dismantling the crematoria at Auschwitz, and making efforts to re-locate, or kill the balance of the Jews that remained. By the December 27th roll call, 18,751 Jews remained. In fact during some of those late December days when the crematoria was being dismantled, errant bombs dropped by Allied raiders did hit Auschwitz killing some German guards.

 

Also, with regard to the bombing of railroad tracks, leading to any of the known “death camps,” no Axis trains were able to run during daylight, for fear of destruction from the air. Tracks were virtually impossible to hit from high-level strategic bombing. Even when individual tracks were hit and destroyed they were almost immediately repaired. Low-level medium bomber and fighters had a greater effect on rail lines but they did not have the range to hit rail targets in Poland. Most of the important railroad destruction came with massive continual strategic daylight bombing of marshalling yards near railroad stations. The effect on this type of bombing was worthwhile, but German work crews, numbering thousands, would spend the nights repairing these yards. Remember, as Martin Gilbert points out, “the details and even the name of Auschwitz were not confirmed until the escape of two prisoners in April, 1944. The Nazis treated the Auschwitz, like every other extermination camp, as a top-secret project.

 

So in his limited time Mr. Rosen summarized what I had written in the above piece. Basically, he stated that the world Jewish leadership did not want the Allies to bomb Auschwitz and kill Jews. The Jewish leadership understood the futility of bombing the death camp and put its effort into trying to prevent the remaining Jews in Hungary from being deported. It was FDR, as Mr. Rosen stated, who, with the help of the Joint Committee got Raul Wallenberg directly involved in the effort to save these remaining Jews.

 

Rosen states on page 383:

 

On June 7, the day after D-day, Yitzak Gruenbaum, of the Jewish Agency met with L.C. Pinkerton, American consul in Palestine. Gruenbaum requested Americans to warn the Hungarian government against killing Jews, to bomb the railway lines, and ‘that the American air forces receive instructions to bomb the death camps in Poland.’ ‘Won’t bombing the camps also cause the death of many Jews?’ he asked Gruenbaum. Gruenbaum replied that the Jews in the death camps were destined to die anyway and might be able to escape in the confusion. The camp’s destruction might disrupt the killing process. Apparently appalled at the idea of killing Jewish prisoners, Pinkerton advised Gruenbaum to present in writing his suggestion to bomb the death camps. On June 11 Gruenbaum handed his proposal to the Executive Committee of the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem. The motion to bomb the camps was overwhelmingly rejected.

 

Of course there is much, much more, and Robert Rosen documents the background behind many of these “folk myths” regarding the fate of Europe’s Jews. Historians and revisionists who have their own personal agenda have promulgated many of these controversies. FDR had to balance all of these factors in prosecuting the war and keeping the American people unified in this incredible effort.

 

In a sense, and in the same vain, as James McGregor Burns characterized him in his masterly written book, FDR, The Lion and the Fox,

 

British historian D.C. Watts wrote:

 

Like an agile predator, he knew when to emerge, reveal his design, and execute it. And once determined to lead opinion and implement a policy, he was unflappable, devious, utterly determined, an unusually inspiring. Now, in early 1939, his course, though indiscernible to others, was clear to him. It could be summarized in six points.

 

First, he had to complete the conquest of the Depression by arming America.

Second, he would arrange a virtual draft to a third term as the candidate of peace through strength.

Third, he would complete the acquisition of an overwhelming level of military might.

Fourth, and assuming a new world war was already in progress, he would engineer righteous hostilities with Germany and the lesser dictatorships, ensuring that the dictators would be seen as the aggressors.

The fifth stage would be winning the war and leading the world to a post imperial Pax Americana, in which, sixth, Woodrow Wilson’s goals of safety for democracy and international legality would be established in some sort of American-led international organization.

 

Nothing less can explain Roosevelt’s conduct from Munich on. No other American leader has ever conceived an immensely ambitious plan for making over the world.

 

Hans Dieckhoff, the German ambassador in Washington up into late 1938, recognized that Roosevelt had a ‘pathological hatred’ of Hitler, and was ‘Hitler’s most dangerous opponent,’ The President had persuaded the ‘credulous and mentally dull American people’ that Germany was ‘America’s enemy number one.’ The observant chargee Hans Thomsen headed the Embassy after the withdrawal of Dieckhoff. Thomsen constantly warned the Wilhelmstrasse and the Reichsfuerher himself that Roosevelt sought the ‘annihilation of Nazi Germany and the nullification of the New Order in Europe.’ Thomsen also predicted that Roosevelt would, in the event of war, try ‘creating the conditions for, and a skillful timing of, the entry in to war on their side (Germany’s enemies’) side.’ He cleverly foresaw that ‘Roosevelt will not neglect the possibility that as Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces he has the power to issue orders which in the course of execution might lead to the creation of a state of war. In the face of this Congress is powerless.’ Thomsen told Berlin that Roosevelt has ‘pathological hatred’ of Hitler and Mussolini, and even predicted that Roosevelt, in furtherance of his goals, might seek a third term as president.

 

The duel between Roosevelt and Hitler would become increasingly elaborate, like a primeval war dance, until the two mortal enemies came to grips with each other.”

 

There is enough evidence, available for all of us to understand, that without Franklin Roosevelt’s strong and brilliant leadership, the war against worldwide Fascism could have been lost. Even with just the loss of Europe and Asia, Jews would have been virtually wiped out wherever the Axis controlled and dominated. For sure, besides Palestine, the Jews of North Africa and the Middle East would have been the next group to be liquidated. How long would Fascist leaning South America tolerate Jews in their midst? Even in America, where anti-Semitism ran rampant in the 1930’s, how long would the so-called “Jew Deal” (as the anti-Semites called it!) have existed without FDR? Therefore, if FDR had not run in 1940, and others, without his values, would have taken control of the country, would American Jewry eventually disappear? It could have!

 

Robert Rosen builds a great case, with his research and perseverance that FDR did what he could do to arm a weakened nation, fight domestic Fascism at home, straddle the delicate balance between peace and war, and create an atmosphere of tolerance. He shows that FDR’s struggle against our own climate of hate and bigotry could be changed, and that we would be able to save the world, and save the remaining Jews from destruction.

 

But FDR was only the President of the United States. In a sense, he could only go so far in changing the world and reversing the calculus regarding people’s prejudices. On page 137 of his book, Rosen reflects on the world condition in May of 1940 when Winston Churchill became Prime Minister.

 

The “great” humanitarian Mahatma Gandhi wrote, “I do not consider Hitler to be as bad as he is depicted.” Neville Chamberlain told Ambassador (Joseph) Kennedy “America and the world Jews had forced England into the war.” (What about Britain’s treaty with Poland? Did he forget that?) Gandhi alleged that the Jews “wanted America and England to fight on their behalf.”

 

There are many more examples that could fill volumes, which reflect the terrible state of anti-Semitism that existed outside of Fascist-controlled Europe and the United States. It is an ongoing lesson to all of us, Jew and Gentile alike. It was Lincoln who said,  “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.” Therefore, we all should learn that no group is immune from prejudice and discrimination. By tolerating the politics of hate and discrimination we innately undermine the precepts of our democracy. Robert Rosen demonstrates to all, who will open their minds, that Franklin D. Roosevelt was truly the “Soldier of Freedom” and one of the greatest friends that Jews and all liberty-loving people have had.

 

So it was a worthwhile trip, I finally got to meet Robert Rosen, and heard his strong message in person. I was able to get back on the road by 4:40 pm. The snows that were predicted, held off until the evening, and before long I was sailing south on the Taconic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese New Year on the Banks of the Hudson 2-18-07

Chinese New Year on the Banks of the Hudson

The Year of the Pig, How Apt!

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

February 18, 2007

 

 

 

Here we are still in early 2007 where we have just segued out of the western New Year to the ancient Chinese New Year, 4705, the Year of the Golden Pig, which comes around every 60 years in the twelve year cycle of the Chinese Zodiac. How fitting that we celebrate that inglorious often miss-characterized animal, whose name has been long associated with gluttony, filth and boorishness. Of recent date, we have been bombarded incessantly, in the media with the notoriety of our human version of these ungulates, or split-hoofed swine like, Anna Nicole Smith, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Nicole Richey, and others. So the Year of the Pig goes on spectacularly with “The Donald’s” Miss USA protégé, and the current vile “boars” at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and in Congress on both sides of the aisle.

 

 The ancient Hebrews were probably one of the first peoples to separate themselves from other indigenous folk by creating dietary laws. As one casually learned in the law of Kashrut knows, that one element of traif is not better or worse than another. But somehow, the pig and its by products always seemed to symbolize the most egregious difference between Jew and Gentile. Maybe it was, because pork and its culinary cousins ham and bacon are so popular in the cuisine of so many. How many times in our lexicon to we daily hear “bacon and eggs,” or “ham and cheese?” Of course dietary laws were said to separate the ancient Hebrews from others, but the fact that the swine genus “sus,” as part of the “suidae” family of animals carried trichinosis, cysticerosis, or brucellosis should have been enough. My mother always attributed dietary laws to Jewish concerns over health issues!

 

Therefore many of us grew up with these restrictions, and more than some of us have gradually drifted away from observing them. Chinese food has always been a favorite staple of modern day Jews, with lobster Cantonese, spare-ribs or egg rolls with shrimp having been often an essential part of their menu.

 

The Chinese believe that the Year of the Pig will not be very peaceful. The pig is one of twelve real or mythical animals that make up the cycle of the Sino zodiac of the lunar calendar. Accordingly, to the Chinese, people born in the pig years are polite, honest and loyal. One born under the sign of the pig is also considered to be lucky. Both Ronald Reagan and Hillary Clinton were born under that sign. Of course pig years can be fraught with violence and disruption as they are dominated by fire and water. The Chinese astrological masters feel that people should be forewarned about the potential of natural disaster and even the possibility of epidemics like bird flu. Therefore the advice is to be extra careful with one’s dietary ingestion. Even a Hong Kong soothsayer feels that North Korea will undergo a power struggle and Singapore fortune teller John Lok predicted Iraq will remain being a quagmire and that our fearless leader, the self-proclaimed “Decider,” will have another rotten year.

 

Traditionally the color red is worn on and during the Chinese New Year to scare away evil spirits and bad fortunes. Good luck is encouraged, by opening doors, windows, switching on lights at night to scare away ghosts and spirits, and candy is eaten to insure a “sweet year.” One also will avoid bad luck by not buying shoes, pants or having a haircut. It is said that on the first day of the New Year one should not sweep the floors or buy any books!

 

Despite all of these forebodings, we did celebrate another edition of our annual Chinese New Year’s fandango. On a cold clear night here in the lower Hudson River valley, all our guests arrived safely and without much of a problem. We lucked out with the weather. The snow event that paralyzed commerce and social interaction on Wednesday was basically cleared up by Saturday. We also experienced a slight upturn Fahrenheit-wise after days of temperatures in the mid-teens. Already predictions for the coming week talk of single-digit artic blasts, known as Yukon Clippers, searing their way through our region.

 

But on Saturday we were well prepared for the coming feast. All of our guests were given culinary assignments and came through remarkably. Among the first timers this year was our old buddy Keith Stupell, who came up by train from Babylon on the Hudson and brought dumplings and candy from Chinatown. Keith the proprietor of Carole Stupell’s on 29 East 22nd Street went far beyond the call of duty in his effort. Keith, not only has been carrying on the famous name of his mother, who was one of the most well-known retailers in NYC history, but is a world’s leading philatelic expert, and whose collection of stamps and ephemera is almost unrivaled on our planet. If you had forgotten or had not known Carole Stupell invented the “bridal registry.”

 

Other first-timers were Dorit and Martin Whiteman from Hollis Hills, New York. The Whitemans, whom we know from Armonk Tennis, made their debut here with egg rolls from Queens and without too much of a problem negotiating the traffic. Dorit is a lecturer and writer whose specialty and expertise is pre-WWII European Jewish issues.

 

Barbara Monahan is another first timer who lives in White Plains, and had to sadly leave her husband Dan home, who was under the weather. Barbara is the commissioner of Westchester’s Taxi and Limousine Department and brought cookies for dessert. She was able to pick up and drive over our old buddy Robin Lyons. Robin, who brought bowls of cut up fruit, is a veteran of these efforts and is the widow of the late George Lyons, a very dear friend. George was one of the leading experts on baseball in America, and had a remarkable collection of baseball memorabilia, which featured unique and rare game-worn baseball jerseys. He also was the eldest of the four sons of Broadway columnist Leonard Lyons, and the brother of Jeffrey Lyons, the movie critic.

 

Corinne Levy, one of Linda’s tennis buddies, brought over a tofu dish and her new beau Dr. Bob Stanley, psychiatrist from Irvington. We hoped that we passed Bob’s muster as being almost normal. Debbie Rubin, whom Linda knows from Barnard College alumnae events, brought her good friend Stewart. Debbie’s contribution was delicious buckwheat noodles. Also hailing from Barnard College was Linda’s classmate Abby Kurnit, who just retired from teaching in the chemistry department at Pelham High School, and is currently filling in at Scarsdale High School. Her husband Jeff, is a professor at Queens Community College, and they both are Life Members of the Village Light Opera Company, whose productions we have attended loyalty. Their next one will be Oklahoma, and it is held at the Fashion Institute of Technology in the heart of Manhattan.

 

 Another tennis friend Diona Koerner, a soon to be retired chemistry professor from Manhattanville/Fordham was accompanied by Ron, her lawyer husband. They both brought chicken with vegetables. My old buddy Warren Adis, who is a professor at Iona College, and his wife Mary, an all-around brain and wit, brought noodles, broccoli and chicken. We have traveled often to the New York museums with the Koerners and the Adises. Both Mary and Diona are English gals by birth, and they have similar interests in chemistry and geology. Warren and I met in the third grade in Mrs. Krohn’s class at the William Wilson/Traphagen School in Mount Vernon and have had many adventures that included being at the NCAA hockey finals in Syracuse in 1967 when our two schools, Cornell and Boston University, collided for the title.

 

Of course, speaking of old classmates, Steve Sinder and I roomed together in Boston University’s Myles Standish Hall. Steve, who is a retired businessman, and his wife Adele, who now hail from White Plains, after decades in Rye Brook, brought fried wontons. Steve and I also had a roommate who played the tuba in the BU band and bass guitar in a group that was an opening act for the Beatles at Shea Stadium and on the Ed Sullivan Show.

 

Sol and Linda Haber play tennis with Linda and me in our weekend indoor games. They have been active participants in our Saturday night mixed-doubles tennis events that have been played in Hastings and Armonk. Sol, who played basketball at Yeshiva of Brooklyn, long after Warren and I were finished shooting the roundballs in Mount Vernon, hits an excellent serve and a potent forehand. Sol is a dentist who specializes in oral surgery and Linda, who is by profession a CPA and also sells real estate, brought a salad with a ginger dressing.

 

Last, but not least were Wally and Ronnie Kopelowitz. Wally is an ophthalmologist whom I met many years ago on the tennis courts of County Tennis. Though he now lives in Great Neck with his wife Ronnie, who is a New York City lawyer and judge, Wally still plays tennis in one of my weekend games and punishes his opponents with his wicked baseline slices. They brought kosher chicken and beef dishes. Wally loves to travel, and they both just returned from another great trip back to his former South African homeland.

 

Our course we supplied the Tsing Tao Chinese beer, Chinese wine, other soft drinks and libations, plus lo mein and dumplings from Stew Leonard’s. Linda made a great Asian cole slaw with cashews, string beans with sesame sauce, asparagus, sweet and sour meatballs and slice marinated steak. I also found some Chinese fortune cookies in the Asian Market in the White Plains Mall on Hamilton Avenue.

 

Meanwhile the party was called for 7:30 pm and by 8 o’clock everyone had made their arrivals. We served the appetizers downstairs, and Warren and I started on our own bottle of Sake. The party livened up as many people renewed old friendships and acquaintances. My former roommate Steve Sinder and Warren Adis hadn’t seen each other in about 40 years. Diona Koerner and Mary Adis always compare notes about their English roots. Keith Stupell discussed with Steve Sinder what drives the postage stamp market, and Linda and I were making sure everyone had enough appetizers. We all moved upstairs to the dining and living rooms for the main dishes. The group moved slowly around the dining room table testing all the delicacies as they filled up their plates. There was enough of a variety for those who wished to avoid meat, fish, nuts, traif, or veggies.

 

For the next course we returned downstairs for cookies, ice cream, fruit and tea. Each time our guests changed floors, it enabled us to clean up a bit more. Finally after three hours of culinary debauchery the party ended. I took Keith over to the Tarrytown Station for the 11:10 train to New York, everyone else escaped into the cool clear air and hopefully made it home safely.   By the way, “Happy New Year” is conventionally thought to mean in Cantonese, Gung hei fat choi. But that really means, “congratulations and be prosperous.” In reality the Cantonese saying for “Happy New Year” is Sun nin fai lok. So either way, thanks for coming, we had a great time so let’s look forward to a better year than the last!

 

Comments by great friend Laurence A. Reich on Chinese New Year!


My wife's family in San Francisco celebrated Chinese New Year with great gusto and zeal. No one was more superstitious than Carole, who supervised our immediate family like a drill sergeant, anxious to be certain that no “rules” and ancient “customs” were disturbed. Showering was prohibited, as was any use of profanity or angry tone against another. My aunt, who by death, is now the patriarch, and keeper of family law, always felt that many of these customs were ill founded and not really part of ancient Chinese lore. Of course the color red was always worn and decorative displays were grounded in red. The last Chinese New Year celebration thayt Carole prepared occurred a month before she died and her entire extended family came down from San Francisco to support her desire for a harmonious new year. All the food was often home made rather than store bought so you can imagine the wondrous and delectible panoplay of gratification that was spread along our tables.
None of the pictures featured the token Chinese guest, perhaps Carole was there in spirit?
Dr. Laurence Reich

 

  

 

 

 

The Death of Hank Bauer, an American Hero 2-10-07

The Death of Hank Bauer, an America Hero

February 10, 2007

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

 

Yesterday February 10, 2007 Hank Bauer, the fighting marine died at the age of 84. You may have heard about his passing on the news yesterday. Today there was an obituary in the New York Times. If you hadn’t read it, I have included a copy. I was always a Yankee fan from my earliest days as a child and Hank Bauer, the solid right fielder for the Bronx Bombers, was one of my earliest heroes. He was one of the few members of the Yankees that was on the roster, and of course played with all of their championship teams from 1949 through 1953. Some of the others were Johnny Mize, Yogi Berra, Gene Woodling, Vic Raschi, Eddie Lopat, Allie Reynolds,  and Phil Rizutto, Bauer, a solid and heroic type who not only starred on the Yankees, but starred with the US Marines in the Pacific. He won many battle stars in combat and was 26 when he finally got to the major leagues. Bauer’s career with the Yanks spanned from the end of the DiMaggio era through the rise of Mickey Mantle. It finally ended when he was part of Yankee General Manager George Weiss’s last great trade of his long career. In 1960 after the Yanks finished a poor third to the Go-Go White Sox in 1959, Bauer was traded with Norm Siebern, Marvelous Marv Thronberry, and Don Larsen for Joe DeMaestri, Kent Hadley, and one Roger Maris. Because of that trade I never really warmed up to Maris. But baseball is still a business and as JFK said long ago, “Success has many fathers, failure is an orphan.” Roger was certainly an immediate success, but soon the “blush was off the rose,” and the injuries that had plagued him in his early career came back to haunt him and turn the once idolizing fans into boo-birds. The rest is history

 

I had a great fondness for Bauer, whose rugged looks became the model for famous cartoonist Willard Mullin’s prototypical Yankee. I have included a cartoon that he drew in the World-Telegram and Sun, circa 1962. Bauer, who batted right handed, slugged 156 homeruns as a Yankee. Left field in the old stadium was the home of what Mel Allen referred to as “Death Valley.” In other words hitting homeruns from the right side of the plate was never easy and many long blasts died out there in someone’s glove. In Bauer’s early years he was unhappy being part of Casey Stengel’s platoon system, but when he became a regular starter in 1950 he hit .320. In the World Championship year of 1956 he hit 26 homeruns. Bauer once said that his greatest memories with the Yankees were the four homeruns he hit in the 1958 World Series against the Braves, a record until broken by Reggie Jackson in 1977, and his bases loaded triple and his game winning catch in the 6th and final game of the 1951 World Series against the Giants. My greatest memory of Bauer was his heroics against the Braves in the 1958 Series. The Yanks were down 3 games to 1 and they rallied to win three straight behind the great pitching of Bob Turley and the clutch hitting of Hank Bauer. Bauer hit .323 in the Series and finished with a record, which still stands, of hitting in 17 straight series games. Hank Bauer had a great arm in right field and very few runners dared to go from first to third on a base hit to right.

 

After retiring as a player he had a successful coaching and managing career that included skippering the Orioles to a World’s title in 1966. He spent many years coming back to the Stadium as an old-timer and he joined with Bill “Moose” Skowron to sponsor a baseball “fantasy” camp in Florida. Though I never met him, I had the pleasure of hearing him and the “Moose” interviewed often. They had great stories and any real baseball fan would love to listen to the “hot stove” league banter. Bauer, like many veterans of WWII, never talked about his war exploits, but his record speaks for itself. Yesterday, unfortunately we lost another from that “Greatest Generation.”