The Advocates 9-6-07

The Advocates with Richard J. Garfunkel on WVOX – AM Radio 1460-

 

Thursday morning September 6th, at 9:00 am, I am hosting my show “The Advocates” on WVOX- 1460 AM on your dial, or you can listen to its live streaming at www.wvox.com.  One can call the show at 914-636-0110 to reach us on the radio. The program this week will have as its guest, Ms. Allegra Dengler. Ms. Dengler is the Chair of the Westchester-based Citizens for Voting Integrity, a former Dobbs Ferry Village Trustee, a member of the Sierra Club Election Protection Task Force, a member of the NY Democratic Lawyers Council HAVA Committee (Help America Vote Act) and the Progressive Democrats of America Election Protection Working Group. She was a candidate for the Greenburgh Town Board in 2005, and is a candidate for Village Mayor of Dobbs Ferry this November.  This week’s subject will be “Addressing the Threat to our Free Elections, and the Impact of Non-verifiable Voting Machines.”

 

Meanwhile the mission of the “Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy “ issues. “Public policy,” therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example, “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time great struggles have ensued over the control of the direction of “public policy” For example: free trade vs. protectionism, slavery vs. emancipation, state’s rights vs. Federalism, and an all-volunteer armed forces or the “draft.”

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

The Advocates 8-30-07

The Advocates with Richard J. Garfunkel on WVOX – AM Radio 1460-

 

Thursday morning August 30th, at 9:00 am, I am hosting my show “The Advocates” on WVOX- 1460 AM on your dial, or you can listen to its live streaming at www.wvox.com.  One can call the show at 914-636-0110 to reach us on the radio. The program this week will have as its guests, Police Commissioner David E. Chong of the Mount Vernon, NY, and Mr. Glen Hockley, a member of the White Plains Common Council. Commissioner Chong is a veteran of over 28 years of law enforcement, spending over 22 years with NYC’s Finest, and became Lt. Commander of Detectives in Charge of the NYPD’s Global Intelligence and Analysis Director of Counter-Terrorism after 9/11. He retired from the NYPD with 119 medals, awards and citations and became the Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety for the City of White Plains, where he served for four years. Since May 2006 he has been serving in Mount Vernon, the 8th largest city in the state as its Police Commissioner. Glen Hockley, after a career in business in New York, is a full-time and active City Council member from White Plains. Glen is active in many civic and community organizations, like the Rotary Club, the NAACP and the Jewish War Veterans. Glen is greatly concerned with the problems of housing, homelessness, hunger, youth alienation and children at risk, and he is actively involved with the Sustainability Alliance, which focuses on solutions to our deteriorating infrastructure. Today our guests will address the ongoing program of young people in crises, youth in the streets, and how to solve and get these youngsters mainstreamed into society in the most meaningful way.

 

Meanwhile the mission of the “Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy “ issues. “Public policy,” therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example, “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time great struggles have ensued over the control of the direction of “public policy” For example: free trade vs. protectionism, slavery vs. emancipation, state’s rights vs. Federalism, and an all-volunteer armed forces or the “draft.”

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

The Advocates 8-23-07

The Advocates on WVOX – AM Radio 1460-

 

Thursday morning August 23rd, at 9:00 am, I am hosting a show called “The Advocates” on WVOX- 1460 AM on your dial, or you can listen to its live streaming at www.wvox.com.  One can call the show at 914-636-0110 to reach us on the radio. The program this week will have as its guests, Mr. John Berenyi, of New York, who has served as an investment banker for over twenty-five years, he is deeply involved in Eco-Property development through his award-winning company Ecocite. He has undergraduate and graduate degrees from Columbia University, and was a Loeb Fellow at Harvard. He has specialized in the arena of finance regarding alternative energy, the environment and the creation of public infrastructures. John has been associated with some of the leading companies in the world, which include: Citicorp, IF Rothschild, and HSBC Capital. He has worked closely with the state governments of New York and California on drafting both legislation creating tax-incremental bond financing and alternate energy projects. Currently he is working along with Councilman Glen Hockley of White Plains, and Supervisor Paul Feiner of Greenburgh on the Sustainability Alliance. Our other guest in the studio, is Mr. John Puma of Mount Vernon, NY, whose career has ranged from creating start-up businesses, to developing communications systems for multi-national communication giants, to building housing for the middle and working class citizens, and to developing alternate energy concepts for communities.  John, who was brought up on Long Island, and gravitated to Mount Vernon, was educated at the State University of NY in Buffalo, and took graduate courses in entertainment arts at NYU.

 

Meanwhile the mission of the “Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy “ issues. The United States Constitution, ratified in 1789 is the framework of our laws. But “public policy” is the amplification of that framework of our laws. In other words, new laws are always being written and old laws are always being challenged. Eventually these challenges reach the Supreme Court for “Constitutional testing.” Out of those tests rulings either re-affirm or change law. Out of these changes, “public policy can shift dramatically, but the arguments, pro and con, can remain with us for many years.

 

“Public policy,” therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example, “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time great struggles have ensued over the control of the direction of “public policy” For example: free trade vs. protectionism, slavery vs. emancipation, state’s rights vs. Federalism, and an all-volunteer armed forces or the “draft.”

 

This morning I will discuss with my guests the ongoing problem of infrastructure decline in the United States, and how did it develop. We will discuss the how this problem evolved, how the concept of deferred maintenance added to the crisis, can it be solved, and how long will it take.  We will also go into the history behind this problem and the question of whether this has resulted from a combination of government bureaucracy, and over-lapping jurisdictions.

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

The Advocates- 8-9-07

The Advocates on WVOX – AM Radio 1460-

 

Thursday morning August 9, at 9:00 am, I am hosting a show called “The Advocates” on WVOX- 1460 AM on your dial, or live streaming at www.wvox.com.  One can call the show at 914-636-0110 to reach us on the radio. The program this week will have as its guest Mr. Paul Court, the long-time lead Social Studies teacher at Mount Vernon High School. Paul, a native son of Mount Vernon, and a teacher there for 27 years has helped me immeasurably with the Jon Breen Scholarship Fund.

 

Meanwhile the mission of the “Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy “ issues. The United States Constitution, ratified in 1789 is the framework of our laws. But “public policy” is the amplification of that framework of our laws. In other words, new laws are always being written and old laws are always being challenged. Eventually these challenges reach the Supreme Court for “Constitutional testing.” Out of those tests rulings either re-affirm or change law. Out of these changes, “public policy can shift dramatically, but the arguments, pro and con, can remain with us for many years.

 

“Public policy,” therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example, “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time great struggles have ensued over the control of the direction of “public policy” For example: free trade vs. protectionism, slavery vs. emancipation, state’s rights vs. Federalism, and an all-volunteer armed forces or the “draft.”

 

This morning Paul and I will discuss some of the following aspects of teaching American History, how as it changed over the last quarter century, is it relevant to today’s young people, are young people being inspired to public service through the teaching of American history, and should we return to the teaching of civics? Tune in and see what Paul Court has to say about the future of education and how it is taught!

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

“The Advocates 8-2-07

The Advocates on WVOX – AM Radio 1460-

 

Thursday morning August 2, at 9:00 am, I am hosting a show called “The Advocates” on WVOX- 1460 AM on your dial, or live streaming at www.wvox.com.  One can call the show at 914-636-0110 to reach us on the radio. The program this week will have as one of its guests, the distinguished journalist Mr. Milton Hoffman, who was with Westchester daily newspapers for 50 years.  Mr. Hoffman retired five years ago as senior editor with the Journal News. Our other guest will be the Hon. Martin J. Rogowsky, a member of the Westchester County Board of Legislators. Mr. Rogowsky represents the Sixth Legislative District of Harrison and its surrounding community. They will discuss the “ever evolving” changing political landscape of Westchester over the past 50 years and address questions regarding the future of our present electoral system.

 

Meanwhile the mission of the “Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy “ issues. The United States Constitution, ratified in 1789 is the framework of our laws. But “public policy” is the amplification of that framework of our laws. In other words, new laws are always being written and old laws are always being challenged. Eventually these challenges reach the Supreme Court for “Constitutional testing.” Out of those tests rulings either re-affirm or change law. Out of these changes, “public policy can shift dramatically, but the arguments, pro and con, can remain with us for many years.

 

“Public policy,” therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example, “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time great struggles have ensued over the control of the direction of “public policy” For example: free trade vs. protectionism, slavery vs. emancipation, state’s rights vs. Federalism, and an all-volunteer armed forces or the “draft.”

 

This morning I hope to address the issues of the “red and blue” electoral regions, the “open” primary, the future of the “two-party system,” the traditional means of voting, the “paper trail” with the new voting machines, and the low voter turnouts.

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

Letter to the Journal News 12-20-07

Letter to the Editor –Journal News

 

December 20, 2007

 

William “Boss” Ryan’s remarks on crafting his own compensation harks back to the arrogance of other political bosses like, Tweed, Marcy, and Hague, who wound up on the trash bin of history. Ryan is a product of a disturbing trend in this country and area, of the one-party political reality. For whatever reason, we have seen more and more areas of our country devolving into the so-called “red or blue,” rotten boroughs. The resulting consequences are less and less accountability to the general public. Most incumbents are never challenged in a primary, and without a two-party system, November doesn’t even count. Well in today’s paper, Democratic Party Leader Liz Shollenberger gave a ringing endorsement to Ryan’s arrogance and “let the public be damned” attitude. In a crass example of letting “one hand wash the other,” Ms. Shollenberger justified his outrageous remarks and salary demands, by saying that “…he could command a large salary as a lobbyist.” An enraged electorate should give him that choice. He has chosen the line of work he is currently doing. The job specifications were made well aware to him and his colleagues. Since when does someone apply for a job (running for an office) and then vote with his fellow employees (his colleagues on the County Board) to determine their compensation, embellished with overly generous committee perks? Though I am a life-long and active Democrat, I see a great flaw developing with the loss of our electoral “checks and balances,” as the two-party system in Westchester fades..

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

The Advocates 8-16-07

Opening Remarks

“The Advocates”

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

August 16, 2007

 

 

Hello, and welcome to our program,  “The Advocates” on WVOX-AM. My name is Richard J. Garfunkel, and I am the host of this weekly forum. This program is coming live from New Rochelle, the Queen City, located on the Long Island Sound, and it can also be heard streaming live on www.wvox.com. One can also call directly to the station at 914-636-0110.  Our guest this morning is Ms. Lynne Lehrman Weiner, who is accompanied by her able husband Mr. John Weiner, a member of the greatest generation, who served his country, in the European Theater, with distinction during WWII, and returned a decorated Captain.

 

Our guest, Ms. Lynne Lehrman Weiner has been and remains a resident of Westchester County for many, many years, and throughout her long career she has been a freelance writer, a reporter, a newspaper editor, a member of the White Plains Human Rights Commission, a social activist, a NY State Democratic Committeewoman, an editor, a lecturer, a film producer and author. Lynn, whom I have known for over 35 years, is the daughter of Dr. Philip Lehrman and her book Sigmund Freud through Lehrman’s Lens, is based on 16 mm amateur films, which her father, the psychoanalyst Philip Lehrman took, during his analysis with Freud from 1928 through 1929. Almost fifty years his death and almost eighty years after a young Lynne Lehrman sat on the Freud’s lap, Lynne has authored a very private insight into a very private man. Lynne has been able to open up a rare and personal view of not only one of the most famous personalities of the 20th Century, but on the world of psychoanalysis and the lost Europe of the late 1920’s.

 

As I say each week, the mission of the “The Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy” issues.  “Public policy”, therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time, great struggles have ensued over control of the direction of “public policy.” For example: free trade versus protectionism, slavery versus emancipation, state’s rights versus Federalism, and an all-volunteer army or a draft.

 

Doctor Lehrman, who was born in Russia in 1895, and came to the United States at the age of ten, graduated from the Fordham College Medical School in 1918. He received his further training at St. Lawrence Hospital in Ogdensburg, NY and he was one of a small group that practiced and taught psychoanalysis in this country. He was also a professor at Columbia University and at NYU.

 

Lynn, did your father ever tell you why he was inspired to practice psychiatry, which was in that day, an almost unknown medical practice?

 

Who was Doctor A.A. Brill and how did he become associated with him?

 

Sigmund Freud, who was an Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist, and who co-founded the school of psychoanalytic school of psychology, is best known for his theories of the subconscious mind, the mechanics of repression and his redefinition of sexual desire as mobile and directed to a wide range of objects. He taught and developed therapeutic techniques that dealt with the values of dreams and saw these same dreams as sources into insights into unconscious desires. What directed your father to go to Vienna and see Freud, and who enabled him to be introduced?

 

(AA Brill, his correspondence with Freud, and after many years of writing him, he was accepted in 1928.)

 

So your father packed up you, your brother and your mother and went off to Vienna when you were a very young child, how long did you stay? (I must add that I knew your mother Wanda quite well, and as a young man, when my wife Linda and I visited, she always was a great conversationalist. Too bad I didn’t know her connection to Freud, I would have certainly asked her a question or two!)

 

When and why did he start to take home movies of Freud, and his contemporaries? Did Freud enjoy being filmed?

 

(The lighting was bad because it was the winter, and Freud seemed to be camera shy!)

 

What happened to the films, how did your father feel about them and how did you discover their existence?

 

This was about 1950, I believe, and just before he enlisted your help in editing all of this raw footage, you had another remarkable experience regarding film and a unique trip to Yemen. Could you tell us a bit about your trip to Israel with John, Operation Magic Carpet, the Alaskan Airlines, and Captain Robert McGuire?

 

(Beginning in early 1949 and for just over a year, Operation Magic Carpet, led by the WWII pilot Robert McGuire, Israel sponsored 380 flights to Yemen, over 1400 mile trip over hostile Arab territory to rescue between 40 and 50,000 Yemenite Jews.)

 

You also took the only films of this historic and unprecedented event, how did that happen, and how did you happen to have a camera with you?

 

What have you done with those films and have they been shown?

 

By the way this is WVOX Radio- 1460 Am on your dial, and you are listening to “The Advocates” with Richard Garfunkel, and his guests Lynne Lehrman Weiner and her husband. You can also hear this live-treaming on your computer at www.wvox.com. Lynn Lehrman is talking about her book, Sigmund Freud through Lehrman’s Lens, which will be coming out in English very soon, and her adventures in the young State of Israel, in 1949 and Operation Magic Carpet.

 

Lynne, please tell us how this project to put this film together, identify the personalities who were captured, and the subsequent literary effort began?

 

(Grant from New Land Foundation in 1985!Lynne and her father had put together a 20-minute version and they were locked away in the Freud Archives- Anna Freud and her concerns.Please let me correct some of these facts!)

 

There were other short film depictions of Freud made by Marie Bonaparte and Ruth Brunswick that mostly depicted Freud’s family life and were taken for private reasons, what happened to these films?

 

Freud remained a famous personage in Vienna up until the late 1930’s when the Nazis took control of Germany. Even though he was awarded by Germany, in 1930, the prestigious Goethe Prize for his contribution to psychology and German literary culture, the Nazis soon burned his books when they took control. Austrians were no less anti-Semitic and after the Anschluss, or the unification of Germany and Austria in 1938, Freud and his family became threatened by the Gestapo. They eventually escaped and traveled to London. Did your father stay in contact with Freud during those dangerous and threatening years? Is their any correspondence between them? If there is, is it available to be seen? (Correct and elucidate, especially, concerning Princess Marie!)

 

Meanwhile, why are the Austrians so interested in Freud after so many years? Is it guilt over their treatment of the Jews and one of their most famous sons? Or is it just a way to create another tourist landmark? What do you think?

 

Of course your work was first published in German and you have visited Vienna, what is your 21st Century perspective on all of this?

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Advocates- 7-26-07

Opening Remarks

“The Advocates”

By

Richard J. Garfunkel

July 26, 2007

 

 

Hello, and welcome to our program,  “The Advocates” on WVOX-AM. My name is Richard J. Garfunkel, and I am the host of this weekly forum. This program is coming live from New Rochelle, the Queen City, located on the Long Island Sound, and it can also be heard streaming live on www.wvox.com. One can also call directly to the station at 914-636-0110.  Our guest this morning is Mr. Paul Court, the long-time lead Social Studies teacher at Mount Vernon High School. By the way, a few weeks ago I told our WVOX listeners that Bill O’Shaughnessy talks about Mario’s on Arthur Avenue, but my wife and I eat there. We were there again last Saturday night with my tennis buddy Wally Kopelowitz and his wife Ronnie, and the place was jammed. The Yankees, with their usual Stadium sell-out crowd, had just broken in the Bronx, and I am positive that half of them wound up on Arthur Avenue.

 

Meanwhile, getting back to our guest, Mr. Paul Court has been associated with Westchester County throughout his life and career. He is a native son of Mount Vernon, where he attended the public schools and graduated from MVHS. He also has earned undergraduate and graduate degrees from Iona College, which to all of you whom are unfamiliar with the City of New Rochelle is located on North Avenue, not too many blocks from our studio. Paul, who has been on the educational staff of Mount Vernon HS for twenty-seven years, is the type of teacher who likes to know his students and find out what makes them tick.

 

As I say each week, the mission of the “The Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy” issues.  “Public policy”, therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time, great struggles have ensued over control of the direction of “public policy.” For example: free trade versus protectionism, slavery versus emancipation, state’s rights versus Federalism, and an all-volunteer army or a draft.

 

The subject of today’s conversation is about the teaching of history. In other words, is history teaching as relevant today as it was a generation ago and if it isn’t what can we do about it?

 

Looking back over a quarter century as a teacher and almost 35 years as a student what are your impressions regarding the changes?

 

Meanwhile, I was a resident of Mount Vernon from 1945 through 1965 and I was also educated in Mount Vernon school system, and have remained in the Westchester area throughout my life. Of course my impressions of Mount Vernon, when I graduated 45 years ago, was that the town had not changed much from the previous decades. But of course since the late 1960’s there has been a profound change. By the way Paul, how did your people come to Mount Vernon?

 

Paul is the fourth lead Social Studies teacher going back to and including the late great Henry Littlefield, who toiled in that department from the late 1950’s until 1967. Henry loved the narrative of American history and was a great believer in the thematic teaching of the subject. Paul, how do you see yourself in that mold, and do today’s students relate to the panorama that makes up our country’s history?

 

During the second half of our program I want to discuss with Paul the changing curriculum we see in the high schools, and what has been de-emphasized in light of political correctness, and what has become more important in the eyes of the State education policy-makers.

 

Welcome back to the “Advocates,” a program devoted to exploring large public-policy issues. Today’s program is about the teaching of American history, and we have as our guest Mr. Paul Court, a native Westchester resident, who has been the lead Social Studies at MVHS for many years.

 

Of course over the last 50 years since I was in junior high school, we seem to have become much more self-critical of ourselves as a nation. I wonder whether our changing demographics have made us more sensitive as a people, or whether different people are now in power. As William Marcy said in the United States Senate in 1832, “…to the victor belong the spoils…” and from some later poet “the victors write the history.” Therefore is our history

 

I can clearly recall that we did not dwell in a critical way on American imperialism in the Caribbean from 1898 to the 1920’s, the issue of the economic rational of the American revolution wasn’t talked about too much, the social flaws in Woodrow Wilson’s administration wasn’t emphasized, and FDR and the New Deal, along with WWII were crowded into the last few days of the school year.

 

Has that changed?

 

How would you measure the importance NY State gives to the “Japanese Internment” during WII, with the Rape of Nanking and the obvious pass the Japanese fascist government received during the early days of the Cold War?

 

Do students relate to political scandals and contentious ideological struggles like Teapot Dome, Alger Hiss, The Army-McCarthy Hearings and McCarthyism, Watergate, Whitewater, Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans, and the current one called Gonzogate, regarding the firing of the 8 or 9 US Attorneys?

 

Do your students see historical parallels between these events, the fall the Alamo, the firing on Fort Sumter, the sinking of the Maine, the sinking of the Lusitania, the attack on Pearl Harbor and 9/11 World Trade center attack, which at different times stirred American patriotic fervor stirred American?

 

 

 

 

 

The Advocates 7-19-07

Opening Remarks

“The Advocates”

by

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

 

Hello and welcome to our program  “The Advocates” on WVOX-AM. My name is Richard J. Garfunkel, and I am the host of this weekly forum. This program is coming live from New Rochelle, the Queen City, located on the Long Island Sound, and it can also be heard streaming live on www.wvox.com. One can also call directly to the station at 914-636-1460. By the way Bill O’Shaunnessy, whose name is synonymous with WVOX radio always has talked about Mario’s on Arthur Avenue. My wife, Linda and I, were there with our friends Doctor Gerry Appel and his wife Alice, and we treated wonderfully by our hosts Joseph and Barbara and Vallone our server. I told Joseph, that Bill talks about Mario’s, but we were there!

 

Meanwhile the mission of the “The Advocates” is to bring to the public differing views on current “public policy” issues. The United States Constitution, ratified in 1789 is the framework of our laws. But “public policy” is the amplification of that framework. In other words, new laws are always being written and old laws are always being challenged. Eventually these challenges reach the Supreme Court for “Constitutional testing.” Out of those “tests” rulings either re-affirm or change law. Out of these changes, “public policy” can shift dramatically, but the arguments pro and con can remain with us for many years.

 

“Public policy”, therefore, is what we as a nation legally and traditionally follow. Over the years the “public policy” of the United States has changed or has been modified greatly. As an example “free public education” is the public policy of the United States. Also, over time, great struggles have ensued over control of the direction of “public policy.” For example: free trade versus protectionism, slavery versus emancipation, state’s rights versus Federalism, and an all-volunteer army or a draft.

 

Therefore with that in mind, the topic of discussion today is one that is on the minds of many, many Americans. It is whether we should return to a draft army, the problems of the transition back to civilian life and the impact of GI Bill of Rights. 

 

To discuss that critical topic we have three guests with us. Mr. and Mrs. John Weiner, from White Plains, who is with us in our studio, and Mr. Jim Kurtz, who will join us on phone from his home in Webster, New York. John Weiner, who was born and raised in Livingston Manor, NY and, served honorably in Europe during WWII was discharged as a Captain, is here with his beautiful and brilliant wife Lynne Lehrman Weiner, who has spent a lifetime as an activist, a reporter, homemaker, mother of three and is the author of the book Sigmund Freud Through Lehrman’s Lens, which is being published in English, and will be released within the next month. Her father, Philip Lehrman, a well-known psychiatrist was a student and associate of the famous Sigmund Freud, and she had the pleasure of sitting on the famous Austrian doctor’s lap. John, who taught for many years at the Edgemont High School, was honored by the State of New York, among many others, for his free book program that raised hundreds of thousands of dollars to assist homeless people.

 

Jim Kurtz, who now resides in Webster, NY, was raised in Mount Vernon, NY, graduated from the Mount Vernon schools and Syracuse University. He volunteered for service in 1967 and served with the 82nd Airborne Division in Vietnam. When he was discharged from service, Jim had been awarded the Bronze Star among his other decorations. He spent his post-war working career, owning a large restaurant in Rochester, NY.  After a hiatus of 15 years he became quite active with Vietnam veterans, which included outreach activities that included dealing with the transitional problems of returning to civilian life, developing a prosthetics factory for land mine victims, and counseling centers for veterans.

 

Therefore with these two decorated veterans, of two very different wars, I would like to start by asking John Weiner his opinion on the draft, how it affected him in the days before WWII and what whether he thinks it should be re-instated today.

 

Next and on our call-in line is Jim Kurtz our Vietnam veteran: I pose the same question to Jimmy, who I have the pleasure of knowing from our school days in Mount Vernon back in the early 1960’s.

 

Background information:

 

A.       Draft was established in 1863, was unpopular. The law authorized that anyone could hire a substitute for $300.

B.        During WWI- the Selective Service Act of 1917, called for all men between 21-30 to register, (later amended to all from 18-45). Exemptions: men with dependent families, serving in indispensable duties at home or physical disabilities. Conscientious objector status was granted to members of pacifist organizations but had to perform alternative services. Other war objectors were imprisoned. End of WWI 2.8 million men had been inducted.

C.       WWII –Selective Service Act of 1940- provided for an army of not more than 900,000 at any one time and limited to 12 months duty. Later (1941) extended to 18 months. The act called for all men from 18 thru 65 to register, and all men between 18-45 could be realistically called. Between 1940 and 1947, the Act annually expired and was re-enacted one year at a time. Over 10,000,000 were inducted.

D.       . New laws were passed in 1948, 1951, 1955, 1967- the 1948 law called for all men to register between 18-26 and were liable to a 21 month commitment and 5 years of reserve obligation. Later the law was amended to 18.5 years old at the minimum and 24 months of service. BY 1967 all men between 18 and 26 had to register with regular exemptions, which included educational deferments and defense education work, or teaching.

E.        In 1973 an all-volunteer army was created, and the draft was abolished.

F.     In 1980 Congress re-instituted draft registration for men 18 to 25 years old.

 

One of the greatest efforts that America made, in terms of the federal government’s participation in education was the GI Hill of Rights. Its official name was the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944. It was signed into law by President Roosevelt on June 22, 1944, just 16 days after the Allies landed at Normandy, and it provided federal aid to help aid servicemen to readjust to civilian life. It focused on hospitalization, purchases of homes and businesses and especially education. It provided tuition, subsistence, books, supplies, equipment, and counseling services. This piece of legislation is considered the last piece of the New Deal acts.

 

Congressman Charles Rangel, in his well-received book “And I Haven’t Had a Bad Day Since,” describes his effort to reintroduce the draft in 2006. He talks about the downward trend in recruitment, along with the rising level of public skepticism regarding the future of a volunteer army. He suggests a draft that would reach everyone between the ages of 18 and 42, with deferments only for the completion of high school and up to age 20, for reasons of health, conscience or religious belief. 

 

Today they are offering bonuses of upwards of $90,000 for reenlisting active duty service men and women in certain specialties.

 

Besides the obvious shortfall vis-à-vis recruiting, a recent story stated that out of the West Point Class of 2001. It was also reported in the Times Herald-Record, of April 28, 2007, that the West Point Class of 2001 had an attrition rate of 46%, after five years, of its graduating class of 903, the highest rate in over three decades. The cost of educating a West Point Cadet is estimated, over the four years to cost between $1 and $1.5 million. Therefore in round figures, the cost to the people of the United States was between $415 and $622 million for that part of the class that has resigned. To me that is quite alarming, no less expensive.

 

 

My next question for both John and Jim is their thoughts and experiences with the GI Bill and did it affect their world, or the world of their contemporaries?

 

A)        Federal Government would subsidize tuition, books, fees, and contribute to living expenses, veterans were free to attend the educational institution of their choice, and the colleges were free to those they would admit.

B)        In the following 7 years 8 million vets received educational benefits. Of that group, 2.3 million attended colleges, 3.5 million received school training, and 3.4 received on-the-job training. By 1951 the total cost was approximately $14 billion.

C)        Another provision was the 52-20 clause. This enabled all servicemen to receive $20 per week for 52 weeks, while they were looking for work. Less than 20% of the money set aside for the 52-20 Club as it was called was distributed.

D)        Low interest loans, zero down payment loans for houses for returning servicemen.

E)         The Vietnam era vets used the GI Bill’s education benefits (72%) than WWII (51%) or Korea (43%). The Vietnam era cost of higher education was $38.5 billion, which was 2.5 times the cost of WWII benefits, when adjusted for inflation.

F)         In the new 1952 law tuition was not paid directly to the colleges because of tuition gouging

G)   Veteran’s benefits for education continued to rise, reflective of inflation from the new 1966 bill through the Montgomery GI Bill in the 1970’s.

 

Obviously the transition back to civilian life is a most difficult one for many returning veterans, especially those who saw combat, were involved in long and prolonged combat situations and were physically or psychologically affected by what they experienced and what they saw. There have been many films that reflected that transition: The Best Years of Our Lives, The Men, The 4th of July, Forrest Gump, and Pride of the Marines with John Garfield about Al Schmid, who was blinded in action.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Letter to the Journal News 7-16-07-Secrecy in Greenburgh

Letter to the Editor of the Journal News

7-16-07

 

Secrecy and Manipulation in Greenburgh:

 

Maybe it is time to have the Westchester DA’s office, and the NY State’s Attorney-General, find out why developer Richard Troy is swearing in a deposition that the Greenburgh Town Board is conspiring with lawyer Robert Bernstein on how to manipulate the ownership and the price of a piece of property that abuts the Greenburgh Nature Center. Does Bernstein want this property for his own personal use? Will this property be used as an eventual Edgemont village hall, if Bernstein is able to engineer Edgemont’s secession from Greenburgh?  It seems to this observer that Richard Troy and his partners, according to his sworn testimony, met Town Board members without the Supervisor’s knowledge. He may have not known that it was against the law for the Greenburgh Town Board to meet secretly, but for sure the Town Board understood the provisions of the state’s “open meetings” statutes. Only a proper investigation will expose how much real influence Mr. Robert Bernstein is exercising in Greenburgh, as he seems to lead the Town Board into one tangled web after another.

 

Richard J. Garfunkel