Politics and Corporation Compensation 4-16-04

Politics and Corporate Compensation

 April 16, 2004

 

 

It is great when you have smart friends and relatives. I applaud both of you for your thoughtful remarks.  Both of you are much more neutral than I am, and therefore you have the luxury of looking for solutions that are more apolitical. From my perspective, for better or worse, the political centrist leadership (of the post WW II era) of the past has disappeared. We had patriotic presidents who knew how to work with Congress and for better or worse could keep the extremes in their parties marginalized. In a sense even Nixon was pragmatist of the center. I didn't like him, and he exploited issues, but personality and psychosis aside, he wound up being a practical leader who understood domestic needs. He also understood the power of the Democratic majorities in the Congress. Even to a degree with Ford and Carter, there was a sense of the centrist perspective to satiate the common weal. They were not great leaders. They inspired no one. Ford was a caretaker that should have never run on his own. Even though he only lost by a whisker to Carter, he should have been beaten by a mile. His remarks “Drop dead NY” and his incredible debate faux pas over Poland haunted him. But he was an uninspiring dolt who contributed the WIP button to his forgotten political legacy. Carter was the ultimate outsider, who was elected because of the Ford pardon of Nixon if nothing else. He was over his head, but still could have beaten Reagan if it wasn't for the hostage crisis in Iran. So what if he could have won. The real political change came with Reagan! Reagan and his cohorts really opened the door for the right. Of course he was too “spaced out” to pay any attention to what was really happening. Certainly even Barry Goldwater was frightened by what Reagan loosed on the body politic. In a sense our free society has, by the nature of being so free, drifted towards libertarianism of the left and the right. On the left everybody wants something and wants the freedom to do it, or try it. If it feels good and no one is harmed, so what's the problem! We have all felt that way for a time. (In the words of Winston Churchill, “Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.”) So through it all, with conservative or liberal government there are no standards, period. But on the right we are seeing the new social Luddites, who want economic freedom, with as little regulation as possible and taxes as low as they can be made. No regulation, laissez-faire, and every man for his/her self. In other words whatever he/she can take, so be it. Just look at the salaries posted in the Wall Street Journal's Executive Pay in the Journal Report of April 12, 2004. Fitting, in an ironic way, that this should come out on the anniversary of FDR's death. 

 

Salary and Bonus- some selections: Freeport-McMoRan-CEO- $5,540 million in 2003 with $10M in stock options and $50M more in potential options, Merrill-Lynch-CEO- $28M in 2003 with $37M more in unrealized stock options, Time-Warner-CEO, $9.5M and $11.6M in stock options with another $18.9M in unrealized options.  Also the front page of the NY Times' Business Day section, bonuses top $41.4 million at troubled Interpublic for its executives. With Federal taxes at 35% for anyone over $300,000 per year they should cry? This compensation is way out of control. Where did they get all of their stock? They didn't buy it!

 

Some critics of pay ratios, say formulas that exclude options are useless. “Usually it's a charade,” says Mr. Alan Johnson of Johnson & Associates, managing director of pay consultants in NY. He says, “employees see through it. The know the CEOs are making millions on stock, so limiting them on salary means nothing. It is a PR gimmick.” (Wall Street Journal). It is a known fact that in and around 1970, CEO's of Fortune 500 companies made in real dollars a ratio of 43 to 1 over the average salary of their employees. In real dollars, wages, taking in account inflation over the past 34 years or so, have gone up slightly. In other words, the $17,000 of 1970 is not worth much more than the $35-40,000 of today. Of course times have changed, and our economy has shifted greatly over the last 30 or so years. Our manufacturing has shifted to overseas, and we are much more of a service economy today. No question “freer” trade has brought more total prosperity to America. But where is that prosperity concentrated and what will be the affects. In that light, executive compensation is now 1000 to one! So we have seen what has happened. The GOP/Right has encouraged the lowering of taxes, the conglomeration of industry, the exporting of jobs overseas, the deregulation of industry, and the accumulation of greater money in fewer hands. Now as in 1929, less people own more of America!

 

Of course, one immediate result is that the “entitlements;” Social Security and Medicare are under attack. Certainly they are threatened by the demographics facing us. We have a large “baby-boom” population (64-74 millions) that is aging. This population emerged from parents that had 2.6 children per family. It is now being replaced by a generation that is composed of 2.1 children per family. Generally speaking this smaller population is not as wealthy and earns less in the service sector than its parents, the baby-boomers, earned in the manufacturing sector! Is the answer less taxes for this wealthiest of classes? It was said that to tax these people at previous levels would only bring in 4% more! Well 4%, if that is correct, will bring in $40 billion at least. (Also why is $75 billion being used from the Social Security trust fund for the general fund?) I am sure that figure of $40 billion is probably incredibly low. I have also noticed that a recent report has stated that the IRS has been lax regarding the issue of corporate taxation. In fact, US Corporations are not paying their fair share, and many have been running to offshore tax shelters for years, while they drape themselves in patriotism! The case of Stanley Tool recently comes to mind! So with corporate taxes at all-time lows (post WWII) and the capital gains tax at 15%, and the highest marginal rate at 35%, one can readily see why we have a $500+ billion deficit that is growing. Should we continue down this path until we are broke?

 

In conclusion, to have a vibrant and just society, we all have to contribute. I cannot and will not equate Hollywood silliness, gay marriage, social promotion, foul language, indecent activities, Michael Jackson, Howard Stern, Don Imus, the NBA, college athletic abuses, and other ridiculum with the hypocrisies of Rush Limbaugh, and his rightwing shock jock colleagues.  The abuses of Enron, World Com, Global Crossing, Tyco, and the rape of children by Catholic priests is not the product of liberal, or libertine largess. In other words, where are we going? To tell the truth, I have no clue!  But for sure I hope that we throw Bush II out, and get new reasonable middle of the road leadership.

 

 

Political Perspective and Historical Record 6-30-04

Subject: Political Perspective and Historical Record

June 30, 2004

 

 

 

Kerry, who was quite well off volunteered to go to Vietnam! A vast majority of his rich and almost rich peers did not. Bush did not want to go to Vietnam and obviously did not want to go to his National Guard duty either. I believe Kerry received 3 Purple Hearts along with a Silver and Bronze Star. There is plenty of contemporaneous testimony to his bravery. Are there people who carp about his medals, and complain about the so-called “real” stories behind them? Yes! But Kerry had the guts to come home and complain about the war, not bask in the glory of his class adorned with his “red badge of honor.” For that effort he engendered the enmity of Vietnam apologists for all of time.  Was his Congressional testimony completely correct or was it the reflection of a whole generation jaded with the invented rationale regarding the whole intervention? Personally, I know little or nothing regarding his motives, during those days, in front of Congress 33 years ago. All I know is that he volunteered, when he could have easily got his “pass.” All I know is that he was highly decorated, above and beyond 99% of all of the 6 million heroes that served.

 

Personally we all have a tendency of romanticizing war and probably we shouldn't. When you see the dead and wounded on both sides it “ain't” pretty. Michael Moore, by the way, is on screen for about 10 minutes. The picture is not about Moore at all. He focuses on the subject of George W. Bush, the Bush family, and their connections, and I believe, their motivations. Saudi Arabia is at the core of the problem that plagues the Middle East. They are really the problem, though they make Israel and our western culture out to be the bogeymen. From the days of Herzl, Israel scratched its way upward from the degradation of Europe. They bought barren land, established kibbutz cooperatives, settlements, villages, towns and cities; i.e., Tel Aviv. They were industrious, charitable and in most cases quite generous to their neighbors. Their willingness to accept compromise was evidenced by their agreement with the original partition. The Arab world has never accepted any compromise, period. In regards to the probable fate of Saudi Arabia, the Bin Ladens and the House of Saud will eventually be destroyed in the same way as the Shah fell. Will their heirs or successors be better? I doubt it! Certainly the chances are that those who follow will be more like Lenin and Robespierre, and a lot less like George Washington.

 

After almost 60 years of struggle, death, mayhem and hatred, Israel, like any other modern state has become jaded with the “so-called” peace process, and looks to protect its people and interests in the best way it can.

 

Moore's film is a creation of what cinematic art is about. It takes and shapes imagery into a message. I believe the bottom line regarding that message is the incompetent danger of George Bush. One thing for sure is that normal people flocked to the theater, and were moved to a standing ovation. It reinforced in them the sanctity of their cause to rid us of George Bush. I did not need to see Fahrenheit 9/11 or any other film to tell me that George Bush is a disaster!

 

 

 

Oliver North and his Supposed Remarks 6-27-2004

Oliver North and his Supposed Remarks

June 27, 2004

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

 

Of course that was quite provocative and assuming it is accurate, (it wasn’t) an ironic twist of history. Unfortunately Colonel North, had lost a great deal of creditability by then and one of the reasons he was in front of a Congressional panel was his involvement in the Iran-Contra mess. Of course he had been supporting a covert war in Nicaragua, in direct violation of a Congressional ban on the funding of the Contras that came from selling arms to our “friends” in Iran. Our great “pragmatic” hero Ronald Reagan withdrew from Lebanon in 1983 after 241 Marines were killed as a result of a terrorist bomb. Reagan said that he would never deal with terrorists and pay international blackmail!  Of course Iraq eventually fought a protracted war against Iran in the early 1980's and was the beneficiary of vital American technical and military assistance and encouragement. In other words throughout the Reagan years we were playing both ends against the middle with Iran, who Reagan brokered a deal to get the hostages out that lead to his election and with Iraq and their merry bunch of Baathists who were threatening all of its neighbors. So what happened after Col. North identified Osama Bin Laden in 1987? We had six more years of GOP rule where we had the USS Vincennes shoot down an Iranian plane with 290 aboard, and Pan Am 103 sabotaged over Lockerbie, Scotland. When finally Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990 and the then President Bush built a coalition to oppose Iraq and then succeeded with an invasion in 1991, what did we accomplish with that victory? Practically nothing. In fact, Bush with a 95% popularity in 1991, eventually squandered our good will with the coalition, was seen as a supporter of oligarchic royalists in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, and was defeated by a small border state governor, Bill Clinton. Did he do anything about supporting the 14 Iraqi provinces that revolted against Sadaam Hussein? No! Did he put pressure on Syria to withdraw from the Bekka Valley and disconnect themselves from supporting Hezbollah? No!  Did he put pressure on Jordan for supporting Iraq? No! Did he put pressure on Yasir Arafat for his support of Sadaam Hussein? No! So in other words, with North's warnings aside, with a large coalition in place and on the verge of destroying the Bathist regime in Iraq, the potential of calling for reforms in Saudi Arabia, the opportunity to force Syria out of Lebanon, and the opportunity to force a separate peace in the West Bank, Bush failed. What resulted? The first Intifada started in 1987 and its success led to the Oslo Accords and laid the groundwork for the second Intifada that is probably still going on.

 

At least Clinton made a great and noble effort to bring about a formula for peace in the Middle East with the Oslo Accords, which Arafat signed and, by his own admission, really never understood or, as he said, even read the text. In fact when he understood its consequences, he more or less rejected it. By the time Clinton left office in 2000 he had hammered out a pretty decent deal called the Barak Plan. But Arafat, who was always insincere, understood that he could not sign onto the Barak Plan, because it may have meant peace. Peace would have never worked for him. But of course in Afghanistan, where the Taliban succeeded in coming to power in 1992 after 14 years of civil rebellion against the Soviets, these fundamentalist Islamics were armed to the teeth with American weaponry. They were the heirs to the Mujahadeen, and in that fertile ground Osama Bin Laden was able to construct his camps, train his forces and to plan his attacks on the west. In 1998 a cruise missile strike was directed towards his camps, but any other efforts against him were always derided by Congress as an effort by Clinton to extricate himself from his own personal problems. But, meanwhile it was 14 years between North's mention of Bin Laden and the tragedy of 9/11. We had terrorist activity throughout those years and never was there any real mention of his name. In fact the present 9/11 commission has heard dramatic testimony from many sources that the Clinton administration was up to its neck in the fight against Bin Laden, but the incoming Bush people did not really focus on that subject until 9/11. Richard Clarke stated that fact in testimony and in his book and those accusations were not effectively challenged and or countered by Bush supporters.

 

Of course there are always great ironies in history and we know hindsight is always 20/20. In October of 1937 President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered his famous and prescient Quarantine Speech in Chicago that called for economic sanctions to isolate and quarantine militaristic nations to counter global aggression. Of course, after being lambasted in 400 editorial pages as a warmonger and a foreign adventurer, and being faced with calls for his impeachment, FDR backed off! In less than two years, Germany attacked and invaded Poland precipitating WWII. Thankfully FDR started his large-scale re-armament program without concern for the public's shortsighted stupidity. Also, though little known today, the last Gallup Poll of November, 1941 asked the American public would it fight to save Britain from collapse? Over 90% of the American public was against military intervention to save Britain! What would have our chances had been with a nazi conquered Britain? 

 

My sense, as a student of history, and a pretty keen observer of every day events, is that President Clinton was never given much room to operate from his right-wing GOP foes and opponents. Right from the start he was hated, vilified and hamstrung regarding bi-partisanship. His accomplishments in Northern Ireland, Cuba, Haiti, Bosnia and other areas were never appreciated or applauded by the GOP or the mainstream media. He made a great effort in the Middle East and was thwarted by Arafat in the end. He continued to contain Sadaam Hussein with eight years of over flights and aggressive counter measures from the air. Meanwhile, in retrospect, if Mohammed Atta was not released from custody, there would have been another recruit. Saudi Arabia is full of them!

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

PS: The remarks attributed to Col. North were never said. The report was false, and it was another terrorist and Al Gore was not the Senator who had asked the question!

 

 

 

 

 

 

FDR Lecture 2002

COLLECTING  ROOSEVELT and ROOSEVELT the COLLECTOR

The Teaching of History through collecting

by Richard J. Garfunkel

January 28, 2003

 

 

My name is Richard J. Garfunkel; I now live in Tarrytown after living the past 33 years, in White Plains where we are currently meeting. I am originally from Mount Vernon, where my parents lived from 1945 thru 1966 and I graduated from Boston University with a Liberal Arts Degree in American History

 

My interest in history, FDR, and his times especially the 1930’s, 1940’s and World War II came in a very special, but probably not unique way. At the end of WWII my father purchased a 4 volume Time-Life pictorial history of WWII.  These volumes depicted the war in the most graphic way. As a young boy I was fascinated by the pictures of war and all the human tragedy that it evoked. The old saying that a “picture is like a thousand words” was never truer than in my experience.

 

Of all the thousand pages in these 4 volumes, there is only one full faced picture that is of FDR on April 12, 1945. That of course is the day he died. I remember clearly bringing the book to my mother, even before I could read and asking “who is this”. She replied with answer that has always been burned on my memory “The War Leader”. I believe that from that day, almost 50 years ago I had developed an abiding interest in FDR.

 

As an introduction to my talk today, which is focused around the teaching and learning of history through symbols, quite often acquired by collecting, Samuel Elliot Morrison the famous American and naval historian, said of Franklin Roosevelt, that “if he had never been President, he would have become famous as a collector”.

 

FDR grew up in Hyde Park, New York, an only son of a young beautiful mother Sara Delano and a very rich elderly father James Roosevelt. Their home was called Springwood; it was actually the second edifice built on that spot.

         

A.    There are various books describing Springwood, or Hyde Park, and or visits to Hyde Park, and the people who worked in and around the mansion. Located there, is the first Presidential Library- FDR had a very close relationship with a distant cousin Margaret “Daisy” Suckley, who lived up the Hudson a few in a home called Wilderstein. Her story is in the Geoffrey Ward book “Closest Companion” Daisy as she was known, lived to the age of 99 and helped run the library in its early years, was a close and intimate friend FDR and kept a remarkable diary and a collection of letters. She was at Warm Springs when FDR died. (Laura Delano, known as Aunt Polly, was another constant companion of FDR; Eleanor called the two unmarried relatives of FDR, his handmaidens!)

B.    Ward’s two books- Before the Trumpet and A First Class Temperament.

 

As it is well known FDR was a lonely, but lively child, who started his life long interest in collecting. As a youngster he was able to chronicle every tree and plant on his parent’s vast property. He became an active taxidermist, and was able to hunt and stuff all the various examples of birds that flew in and around Hyde Park and he became an accomplished photographer. Two of his interests that evolved in that era was his love of the sea and his love of stamps. He was given a stamp collection from his uncle, Frederick Delano and became life-long collector of stamps, and he started to collect naval prints.

 

His parents took him to Europe many times, of course by sea, he acquired a love for the sea, started his love for the navy, and he went on to accumulated the largest collection of naval prints and became an accomplished sailor. He would eventually sail his boats in the cold waters of the Bay of Fundy, near Campobello Island, in the Canadian maritime-provinces. It was there while swimming in those cold waters, he weakened him self sufficiently enough to catch Infantile Paralysis, or Polio, that was rampant in those days (1920) while he was visiting a boys camp.

 

 Later on as President he took the wheel of the USS Augusta, through these same challenging waters, on his way to the historic meeting with Winston Churchill where the famous Atlantic Charter was crafted. Of course in that famous Charter, FDR reiterated in article six, points that he made in the State of the Union, also known as the Four Freedoms Speech, of January 6,1941. It declared, “that after the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny, they hope to see established a peace that will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety within their own boundaries. And it will afford assurance that all men, in all the lands, may live out their lives in freedom from fear and want. And what is the connection? Of course, Roosevelt had declared in his first inaugural the immortal line, “…that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself…” Later on, FDR would refer to these four famous freedoms: from want, from fear, the freedom of speech and the freedom of worship in the context of the phrase “all over the world.” In other words for the first time in history FDR was staking out new territory. He was the first statesmen to state that people had a right to these “freedoms” all over the world. The impact of these words continues to echo. Norman Rockwell’s famous depiction of the “Four Freedoms” became one of the most popular posters of World War II. And of course the next connection came with Eleanor Roosevelt’s heroic and historic championing of the “Universal Rights of Man” that was incorporated into the UN Charter. In a sense the “Four Freedoms” finally put a stake in the heart of totalitarianism.

 

A.    Warm Springs Story,  A Perfect Deception

B.    naval prints

C.    stamps, covers-

 

Of course long before his attack of polio, FDR, went to Groton, a famous prep school. He was profoundly influenced by the Reverend Endicott Peabody, who was the longtime headmaster. Later on Mr. Peabody’s daughter and grandson became quite famous. Of course those names are very old New England names, going back to Plymouth Rock. The grandson Endicott Peabody was a Governor of Massachusetts while I was a student at

Boston University. It was said of him, that he was the only man in America that had three towns he was named after; Endicott, Peabody, and Marblehead. I hope you picked that up. Governor Peabody’s mother, was a famous anti-Vietnam War protester who very early on in the 1960s was arrested while protesting our involvement in SE Asia.

 

FDR of course went on to Harvard, where his distinguished distant cousin Teddy Roosevelt, then President had attended. Though the Hyde Park Roosevelts, were Democrats (FDR was taken by his father to see President Grover Cleveland when he was 12, and it is said that the President extended only one bit of advice to FDR, “Young man if I could give you council on one thing, never aspire to become President”. It is interesting that Bill Clinton, as a young man, was able to meet Jack Kennedy at the White House, but I do not believe any advice was given. FDR supported TR for re-election in 1904, even thought TR and his Oyster Bay branch family was all Republicans

 

A.    Histories of the Roosevelts

B.    TR’s daughter Alice was a famous character in her own way, lived to he 90’s was a DC social critic and hated Eleanor Roosevelt

C.    It is said that FDR wore his pince-nez classes to be like TR and of course wound up marrying TR’s favorite neice.

 

FDR became interested in politics, quite naturally, at Harvard, and though from an aristocratic family, he was rejected at the famous and exclusive Harvard Club Porcellian, where many of the Roosevelts had belonged, including his father and TR. It is said, by some, that it was at that moment of rejection, that FDR with his Democratic Party leanings, started to become disenchanted with the upper classes and the role society played in dominating America. Later on, it is said, that he paralleled his black-balling from Porcellian by an unknown detractor, to the back room deals the powerful made in regards to the future of the country.

 

FDR became a lawyer, ran for office in Dutchess County, fought the Tammany bosses of the Democratic Party in NYC, and eventually was appointed to the job of Asst. Secretary of Navy in the new Wilson administration. Of course TR had been an Assistant Secretary of the Navy and eventually about five other Roosevelts will have served in that position. FDR wound up practically running the Navy Dept in the war, because, Josephus Daniels his old and crusty boss was a pacifist! (Jonathan Daniels and Lucy Mercer)

(Eleanor and Franklin by Joseph Lash, Eleanor’s good friend)

A.    a signed collectible from WWI with FDR asking for “glasses for the Navy”

B.    card of FDR and Eleanor coming back from the Versailles Peace Conference 

C.    Fore River with Joseph P. Kennedy-struggle over ships-

 

After the war and capitalizing on his famous name and his great work, he was nominated for Vice-President on the James Cox ticket. He campaigned relentlessly, but the GOP tide with the Harding-Coolidge ticket was irresistible. But FDR had made his own name nationally, and out of the campaign came the famous Cox/Roosevelt jugate. A very rare button, a jugate has two heads on it and is the most collectible of all presidential type buttons. Since there are only about 7 or 8 of this button it became the most expensive in history   

         

A.    button board-of FDR buttons

B.    Judge Joe Jacobs story $50,000, and the Macolm Forbes bidding contest

C.    Very rare any artifacts from that campaign for the average collector

 

Of course, soon after the campaign FDR contracted Polio, went through a long struggle to survive and recover, overcame his mother’s request that he retire, and he re-entered political. Two very important figures became more prominent in his life. Louis Howe, his old confidant and asst. from both Albany and the Navy Dept and Marguerite “Missy” LeHand his private secretary.

 

A.    Letter from Missy LeHand (her great influence)

B.    book on Rollin’s book “Roosevelt-Howe” (his death in 1936)

C.    Emergence of Jim Farley

 

FDR started his slow emergence back into politics with his famous nominating speech at the 1924 convention, where he proclaimed AL Smith, the great governor of NY, the Happy Warrior. This name would stick and Smith was eventually nominated again by FDR in 1928 and he became the 1928 Democratic candidate. In that same year, as Smith lost in the Hoover and GOP tidal wave, FDR was narrowly elected Governor of NY by 28,000 votes over Albert Ottinger. Ottinger was a conservative Republican Uncle of the former liberal Democratic congressman Richard Ottinger, whom my wife worked for and I campaigned for in 1960’s through early 1980’s.

 

Later on, as Smith became an embittered and jealous foe of FDR, it was thought that it was FDR, who really was the Happy Warrior.

 

A.    Albert Ottinger button

B.    FDR as Governor of NY

C.    Letter as governor

 

FDR was of course elected to his first of four terms in 1932, in the wake of the great depression.  He was 50 years old, he had matured he had tempered and he had acquired great patience. He had said, “ that one learns patience, when one has to take 6 months to learn how to move one’s big toe!”

 

Of course there is a mountain of collectibles on FDR that emerged during and after his Presidency. I have brought over some of the more interesting items that I have found. Most of here are more familiar with the Roosevelt Presidency, so I would like to focus about some of the collectibles and some vignettes about the man himself. Busts, clocks, covers, newspapers, photos, calendars, thermometers, coins, stamps, covers, badges, ephemera (paper and literature) all make up a political collection.

 

A.    cartoons- Marist College has an on line collection

B.    most photographed man in his lifetime

C.    most books written about him,over way over 400, passed Lincoln a few years ago.

D.    RR station in Greenwich, CT.

E.     ability to walk-

F.     relationships- friends- women-politicians

G.    Eleanor Roosevelt

H.    Fala

I.       Joseph P. Kennedy- Doris Kearns Goodwin

J.      Polio and the March of Dimes- Basil O’Connor

K.   Birthday Balls

L.     MacArthur & WWII

M.  Pearl Harbor

N.   excellent leadership-Marshall-Eisenhower-King-Nimitz

O.   death at Warm Spring West Point Cadets at Hyde Park

           

 

Mount Vernon Change and Legacy 1963-2003

           Mount Vernon Change and  Legacy                    1963 through 2003

 

Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas National Impact

Local Consequences

 

Talk delivered by Richard J. Garfunkel at

MVHS – March 30, 2004

 

 

 

I was raised in Mount Vernon and lived here from 1945 to 1965. My parents were native New Yorkers who were both born in Manhattan, were married in 1935, moved to Brooklyn shortly after, and moved to Mount Vernon at the end of WWII. They were very typical of the urban American whose forbearers were Europeans, who immigrated to American cities, and eventually migrated to the suburbs to escape the declining cities.

 

The United States and New York in particular, for our purposes, came out of the great Depression at the victorious close of World War II. Ever since the Crash of 1929 life in the states had changed radically. After the boom period that had lasted from most of the 20th Century from mid-1890s until 1929, the great American dream had come to a screeching halt. Life, as contempory people knew it, had changed dramatically and the change seemed permanent.

 

When you look around this city, in particular, and you look at buildings like the old AB Davis High School on Gramatan Avenue or the Pennington School, you are seeing the last architectural vestiges of the pre-crash 1920’s era. In fact many of the older apartment buildings and the bigger houses in Mount Vernon were build before the crash. Only some public buildings were built with New Deal- WPA 1930’s money, and all the rest were built after the war. In other words there was little or no housing built generally in America from 1929 to 1945.

 

Because of the Depression, money and investment dried up, and along with that fact, unemployment rose catastrophically after the crash from a low in 1929 of 3% to over 30% in 1933. As a consequence certain dynamics started to take place.

 

a)      The farms and farm prices which had been in trouble since the mid 1920’s started to collapse

b)      An internal migration started from the Mid-West farms to both California in the West and to the cities in the East: California for farm work, the East for relief.

c)      African-Americans, who were more concentrated in the South prior to World War II, were the poorest of Americans and were hurt the worst by the Depression.

d)      Without jobs or housing the cities became more crowded as migrants from the rural regions moved to the North and East.

e)      Again without money for housing, all housing deteriorated accept Federal Housing supported by the New Deal.

f)        Almost every family was affected by unemployment or underemployment. Benefits, as we know them today, were either non-existent, or at the whim of one’s employer. Social Security was passed in 1935, but had no impact on the Depression. Almost every other program, including Medicare, Medicaid, and a plethora of others were years away.

 

But after war broke out in Europe in late 1939, the United States started its large arms build-up in preparation for the potential of involvement. Almost immediately jobs opened up in the industrial North, the farms became solvent in the Mid-West and African-Americans flocked to industrial areas like Detroit, Cleveland, Toledo, Indianapolis, and Chicago. Large war plants needed workers as America eventually entered the war. With the draft boards calling hundreds of thousands of young men into the service, and the need for 24 hour a day –triple shift production, more workers were needed, especially from the rural South.

 

Even the City of Mount Vernon was caught up in war production as massive plants were built near McQuestern Parkway and old chemical companies on Washington Street were pressed into maximum production. The 100,000 square foot Vernon Electric plant that was located near the Dyer Avenue subway had 50,000 workers on triple 8 hour shifts per day.

 

As a consequence of all this new employment, new migration, a shortage of workers, and war debt from deficit spending, a new prosperity developed during and immediately following the war. Especially since people had nowhere or no time to spend there earnings, savings increased dramatically.

 

Certain dynamics started to happen:

 

a)      Soldiers came home from the war

b)      The great baby boom started

c)       The suburbs grew dramatically as new apartments sprung up in lower Westchester, and whites left the cities by the hundreds of thousands to live in the suburbs.

d)      African-Americans also moved into small Westchester cities like Mount Vernon, New Rochelle and Yonkers, but not in large numbers.

e)      African-Americans moved from the South, where Jim Crow still reigned supreme, to the more liberal Northern cities.

 

Therefore the scene was set for the great social change that emerged after WWII.

a)      Even though there were always African-Americans in Mount Vernon, the numbers were still small, and they were concentrated on the southwest side of the New Haven RR tracks.

b)      Schools were old in Mount Vernon, like everywhere else and crowded.

c)      The city was divided racially, and ethnically.

d)      African-Americans lived on the Southwest side of town with poor Italians and other whites: the Washington Jr. High/Alexander Hamilton School areas

e)      Lower and middle class Italians and Jews lived in the Graham School district

f)        Middle and upper middle class Protestants, Irish and Jews lived in the Traphagen School district.

g)      Middle class Jews and Italians lived in the Fleetwood or Nichols school district

h)      Also there were always a significant number of Roman Catholics who sent their children to parochial schools.

i)        With the building of the new apartments near Pelham, the new Holmes School was opened in 1954. This school was a stat-of-the-art facility, with small classes and almost a 100% white student population.

 

When the Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas case was decided unanimously by the Supreme Court in 1954, Mount Vernon had legal, or “de jure” integrated schools. But similar to other Westchester cities, the local primary schools were “de facto” segregated due to problems of location created by economics, class and race.

 

But there were other, more unique to Mount Vernon; problems that started to arise after the conclusion of the war. Mount Vernon High School had been divided into two schools in the early 1930’s, one was AB Davis High, which had an academic based, college preparatory curriculum, and Edison Tech, which had a vocational and trades curriculum. In the years just before the war, and certainly during the conflict, Edison became vitally important to the war effort. Edison’s motor and aviation trades became essential to a modern machine oriented army. Trained mechanics were vitally important if the United States were going to be victorious in this mechanized conflict. But after the war, both Davis and Edison were over-crowded. Edison especially was inadequate, and when the need for mechanics and vocational training subsided, Edison became a type of “dumping ground” for students who were not academically as gifted, or were socially a problem. Therefore, two parallel, but separate dynamics developed. One parallel was the need for a new, bigger, more comprehensive school, and the other, was to keep Davis High more pristine as an academic magnet and beacon. Therefore, the efforts to finance and build a new school, which started to gain momentum in 1948, were defeated five times until 1959. One could say the delays were because of the fear of mixing different economic and social classes, or one could believe that it was racially motivated. But in 1963, the combined senior classes of Davis and Edison were approximately 85% white and 15% non-white.  Not all of those 95 non-white students out of 633 attended Edison. Meanwhile, the referendum to build the new combined high school was finally passed in 1959 after 12 years and five votes, and the work was begun on the Baker Field site on California Road in 1963.

 

Of course this entire issue had very little impact on my classmates and me. By 1963 in my senior year in high school, nothing had dramatically changed in Mount Vernon, or in the AB Davis High School building. Davis High was now called Mount Vernon High School, and some of the activities involved students from both schools.

 

There was racial harmony; sports teams were combined between Davis and Edison and the atmosphere in class proceeded in a normal almost passive way. The teams enjoyed new success with the merger, and many of the sports heroes were African-Americans from both the Davis and Edison campuses. In fact, there was a great deal of unity and the transition to the new high school seemed to be on a straight and non-controversial path. The old animosity that had divided the separate racial, religious and ethnic communities of the past 15 years were not apparent to me, my friends, my parents or the city in general. But there were fissures in the community regarding busing, and the Dodson Report in 1964, authored by Dan W. Dodson, Director of the Center for Human Relations and Community Studies at New York University, recommended busing children from one section of Mount Vernon to another. This created dissention and the liberal Jewish community welcomed his suggestions, but other Jews and many Italian-Americans formed a new organization, Parents and Taxpayers (PAT) to voice their opposition. “They said that they were not, they insisted opposed to integration; they only wanted to maintain the quality of the neighborhood schools.” (A)

 

Malcolm X addressed parishioners at the local AME Church, and his speech radicalized young people in the audience. The Board of Education presented proposal after proposal, intended to soften the edge of segregation, while retaining its substance. At a public meeting in February of 1966, Clifford Brown, a young militant leader of CORE, took the floor and turned a black-white confrontation into a clash between African-Americans and Jews. In response to a challenge from the Jewish president of PAT, he exclaimed, “Hitler made one mistake when he didn’t kill enough of you!” Brown’s retort, published in two consecutive issues of the NY Times, achieved national notoriety. As a result of this, “white flight” ensued. With this rapid decrease in the Jewish population, property values plummeted, and the Italian community complained that Jews had forced desegregation upon Mount Vernon and then fled the consequences. In fact, integration was the inevitable result of the new federal laws and the new migration from NYC and the Bronx started to change the demographics of Mount Vernon significantly. 

             

Around the country, especially after the situation in Little Rock in 1957, integration was more of an issue in the south, and there was very little local news about it. Also, because of the national fervor created by Little Rock, I can remember vividly protesting the singing of “Dixie” in junior high school during that year. One local story that made the headlines was when New Rochelle was forced to close down Lincoln Junior High, which was located on Lincoln Avenue. Lincoln was totally African-American due to “de facto” segregation, and a court ruling ordered it closed. It sat vacant in that neighborhood for many, many years.

 

Of course, the Brown ruling had two parts, and though the first ruling had made “de jure” segregation unconstitutional, the second opinion, the next year, included the notorious comment that desegregation should proceed “with all deliberate speed.”  This phrase would later foreshadow the long and drawn out efforts by school districts to delay change in both the obvious cases involving “de jure” segregation and the less obvious, more complicated cases regarding “de facto” segregation. Of course many districts went ahead to modernize their schools, and in these school districts that served many communities, large central high schools and junior high schools were built. The problem still existed on the local level with elementary education. Parents wanted to have their small children walk to the neighborhood school, and, therefore new solutions eventually came forth with “open enrollment” and busing. On the high school level there had never been a real controversy over large comprehensive campuses. But on the neighborhood level, where the real problem of “de facto” segregation existed, the animosity, especially in the North exploded. Fear of racial-mixing at the primary school level started to change attitudes as to where people wanted to live. People felt that educational quality would decline and their property values would soon follow.

 

Of course, this did not become a real issue until many years after the Brown decision. Other realities started to effect society that would drive the racial divide and the change America. The assassination of John F. Kennedy was a body-blow shock to America that is still felt to this day. Civil rights activities with “Freedom Rides” in the South, the emergence of Martin Luther King Jr. as a national force, violence in Selma, Meridian and Birmingham became every day events. Also along with the struggle over accommodation of facilities in the South, the cities were in crisis, the build-up in Vietnam was escalating and the country was experiencing high levels of crime and civil disorder from a racial perspective that had not been witnessed since the Civil War and the race riots in Detroit during WWII. The deaths of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy in 1968, along with riots, the explosion of crime related to drugs, and the continued killing in Vietnam and the casualties from the massive North Vietnamese-Viet Cong Tet offensive started to change attitudes in many communities about the values of our society and its institutions. Also young veterans arriving back from Vietnam were increasingly unhappy with circumstances that faced them here at home.

 

As a consequence of all of this activity and turmoil, the era of “good feeling” that the 1950’s portended to be, began to end around 1965 and was finished by 1968. New realities emerged with the continuing social struggles. Racial antipathy sprung up in Boston over the school busing issue and NYC became inflamed over local control of schools as its massive school district was divided into 33 semi-autonomous districts. The upper middle-class whites started to move from the suburban cities to the towns, and lower middle class whites felt abandoned by their richer white neighbors.

 

But for the vast majority of minority children in many areas of the country, education, which had been a captive of “de facto” segregation, started to change. New opportunities opened up with integrated education, and though it would take many, many years, a vast number of whites and non-whites started to understand each other through the process of education. But today, ironically, there are many communities that once again have “de facto” segregation. Today the 25 largest urban school districts in the United States are minority dominated. The minorities may not be the old minorities of the post WWII era, but now they are a mixture Hispanics, Asians, Africans, Eastern Europeans and Arabs along with African-Americans. The center cities have always been a mixture of rich and poor. The new immigrants have always flocked to the cities where there are jobs. So in other words the cycle continues.

 

Today new realities affect education and they include, the mixture of new and different cultures, the conflict over value-based teaching, in other words the separation of church and state, the relevancy of curriculum and the under-funding of many school districts. Across the Northeast the constant problem of under-funded districts versus rich districts plagues educators and state officials.

 

From my own personal perspective, I was as much of a captive of my past as anyone else. My parents were Democrats, socially moderate, but leery of others. Their friends were almost universally Jewish, but my father had more contact with others through business and golf. I had many friends in my Prospect Avenue neighborhood, This section of Mount Vernon, which was south of Lincoln Avenue and west of Pelham, was populated by Jews, Italians, Irish and Protestants. We all freely associated with each other, and Church, G-d, religion, politics, and race were rarely if ever talked about. Many of my friends, in that neighborhood, went to parochial schools, but, all in all, few were very religious. Our common philosophy was of being American and not hyphenated Americans. There was no ethnic languages spoken in the street unlike NYC, Neither of Italian or Yiddish was ever heard and generally speaking there were few if any ethnic jokes. The “N” word or any other racial or religious slur was not heard in our neighborhood. For better or worse, our contact with African-Americans was slight. Our contact with Hispanics was almost non-existent and our contact with Asians was limited to one very smart well off Chinese Taiwanese diplomatic family.

 

During high school I was involved with athletic teams and came into daily contact with African-Americans from both Davis and Edison and had great relationships and fulfilling experiences. During college I returned to Mount Vernon often, and stayed in contact with the high schools athletic programs through 1967. After college, and until 1977 when my other responsibilities intervened, I stayed active with the Mount Vernon HS sports activities. Recently, over the last ten years, through my work with the Jon Breen Memorial Fund, I have had renewed contact with a Mount Vernon High School, that has changed mightily since the late 1960’s and mid 1970’s.

 

All in all, the promise of the Brown decision is still unresolved. Integrated education has worked for many millions, but generally speaking the quality of public education has been declining for many years, for more and more Americans, both white and non-white. Is the answer, regarding this decline, reflective of the change in the traditional home, the change in our culture, the women’s movement, the new drug culture, a decline in our core values, the need for curriculum change, the inequity of school funding, and a score of other issues? Ironically there are many more “de facto” segregated schools then one would imagine. We easily see in our region, a Mount Vernon HS with a minority population of 98%, a Bronxville HS with a non-minority school population of probably 98% white. Therefore, what is the answer?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Passing of a Giant- Henry Littlefiedl 4-4-2000

Passing of a Giant- Henry Littlefield- 2000

 

To: Al Bevilaqua- Wrestling Coach, historian, writer, and colleague of Henry Littlefield.

 

Dear Al- Thank you very much for you wonderful release. It warmed my heart to see an important part of his magnificent coaching record brought to light again. It is hard to believe that it has been 33 years since I was up at Niagara University, witnessing the last MVHS coaching effort of the great man. Though a partisan, I always regarded Henry's record as second to none in Section I and maybe anywhere else. He had no worlds left to conquer. In six regular seasons he coached and won five straight Section I titles 1963-4-5-6-7, 4 or 5 Division titles and 4 or 5 holiday titles. (I shall take credit for one of those holiday titles. Someone didn't count one of our high placings, a 2nd or 3rd in one of the weight classes, and just before the trophy was about to be given over to another coach and school, I ran over to Coach Littlefield, whispered in his ear and gave him the new count. It was our closest call.) MVHS was undefeated in Section I competition for those five years, won the unofficial State Section title in 1966-7 and produced in five years over 25 Section I Champions. In fact, in two back-to-back years, MVHS had 18 wrestlers in the finals and came away with 9 champs. Counting the holiday tournament, the division, Sections and the States, Henry produced over 60 champions. Henry accomplished this unparallel record without the benefit of a junior high school program and the limitation of a three-year high school. Many of his great champions; Jimmy Lee, Howie Wilson, Ricky O'Daniel, Alex Cunningham, Doug Garr, Jim Hardy, Mitchell Gurdus, John Carlucci, Mike Viggiano, Ray Johnson, Mario Criscione and Bob Panoff had barely 3 years of competitive wrestling. He was a master of drilling, isometrics, technique and adaptability. He was always the great teacher. After our only loss in the 1962-3 season to Freeport, he realized that his team had been beaten by the chicken-wing/ half-nelson. No one had ever been taught the counter! No MVHS team ever suffered from that hold again. (This is just from memory, when I have time I will look up the actual numbers, which I have.) Those years were truly marvelous and never to be forgotten. He was able to turn a group of poor kids from the two high schools, Davis and Edison, into a cohesive and caring group. Never once, in the years that I witnessed his coaching, did I ever see him lose his temper, raise his voice or experience back talk or grousing from his men. Never once did I see him lose his “cool” around the mat, never once did I ever see him “bait” a referee. The officials loved and respected him and his judgment. They all knew that he was the “master”. His opponents, coaches and wrestlers flocked to him for guidance and words of wisdom. Our wrestling room was always open to alumni from MVHS and the rest of Section I.

 

I saw many, many former opponents listening with rapt attention at the foot of the “master”. He treated them as men, as competitors and as worthy foe. It wasn't long before they became his “grapplers”. When Mount Vernon won its State Section title in 1967, I witnessed a rare event in sports. Virtually all of the other champions and near champions flocked to his side. They wanted to be in the pictures with the great Littlefield and his team of stars; including the great and unparallel Jimmy Davis, the lightweights; Alex Cunningham, Doug Garr, and Mario Criscione. To me it was a magic moment burned in my mind's eye. Who know that that night would be the end of his fabulous run? Of course, the dynasty continued for a number of years with his marvelous protégés Randy Forrest and Jimmy Lee. As much as I loved them both, it was never quite the same. Henry's big shadow always remained omnipresent and his twelve league boots could never really be filled.

 

 

Henry Littlefield Remembered 2003

 

Henry Littlefield Remembered 2003

 

I really appreciate your wonderful remarks. I was very lucky to know Henry for all those years. When I flew up to Niagara University for the State Championships of 1967, I experienced a similar type of departure. Here I was included as almost a member of that great team. Here was Jimmy Davis, on top of the wrestling world (he's still talked about today), the late great Alex Cunningham, Doug Garr and Mario Criscione all winners, and scoring members of that championship team. Here is the great Henry Littlefield in the center of the action and adulation, along with Randy Forrest one of the greatest competitors of our time and me! Here I come along from Boston University, flying in from Providence, Hartford and Syracuse and landing in a snowstorm. Here I am with not a bed to sleep in, nor literally a “pot to piss in” and Henry says, “Richie get in the picture, you belong as much as anyone!” Wow! Top of the scholastic wrestling world, and even I did not know that this was his last match. The saga ended there and that night. I was there with him when we walked out of the door of the White Plains HS on that cool March night of 1962, and he put his big arm around my shoulder. In our first official year as a team, Henry was telling me how he had made the mistake of wrestling Bobby Danetz at 183 instead of Howie Wilson, who wrestled up at heavyweight. He told me that he would never again let his heart outweigh his brain when it came to who should wrestle where. I was always at his side during the Divisions and Sections the next five championship years. In fact at age 18 he had me run the Sections at MVHS and I ran it the next two years. What a great five years they were. We were undefeated in Section I dual meets, won all the Holiday tourneys and the Divisions and the Sections. We broke all the scoring records, and re-wrote the history book of Section I!

 

So that night it was all over. The next year Henry went to Northampton and the book closed on a unique time. Of course Randy and Jimmy were good, very good, but nothing would really be the same. I stayed around until about 1977 when Jimmy left and that was it for me. I had a business to run, a house to maintain and two children to raise no less being active in local politics. An era ended.

 

Henry grew up without a father, went to Trinity Prep, lived in Manhasset, LI, taught Jimmy Brown how to wrestle in the “Y” pool, went to Columbia University, wrestled and played football for the class of 1954, met Madeline Smith from Long Island, fell in love, got married and went into the Marine Corp. He told me once how he came to Mount Vernon, but I forgot. He met the legendary General Lewis “Chesty” Puller at Camp Lejeune, re-enacted the famous Marine landings on Okinawa for the 10th Anniversary of that great battle in 1955, and started to teach in Mount Vernon in 1958. He started a wrestling club with Sully Mott and the great Bill Sywetz, and their first official team year was 1961-2. I met him in the AB Davis gym, after; I was cut from the basketball team by Vinnie Olson. We had had our differences. When I talked to Henry I told him that I had spent one year at Horace Mann and came in contact with Gus Petersen, who was the trainer there. Petersen was a famous turn of the century wrestler, and an equally famous coach at Columbia where Henry met him as his career wound down. We both liked history and Henry ask me to help him with the team. From that day on we were rarely out of communication with each other for almost 40 years. Henry loved science fiction, baseball, mysticism (especially Edgar Cayce) and the ironies of history. When I met him, in my junior year at Davis, I was already regarded as one of the top history students. I had read practically every book on WWII in the MV public library by the time I was 12, and Henry and I talked WWII history constantly. We rarely talked about wrestling and I rarely gave him my opinion on the sport until years later. I helped him run the practices at Edison Tech, and he turned over almost everything to me that involved management. I did the ordering of the uniforms, the wrestling shoes, not sneakers, the headpieces, the kneepads and even the tape. I organized everything with complete fiat from the Coach. We had huge teams and he had to make order out of the chaos that could have developed. The high point of the practices was the wrestle-offs. I would time and score the wrestle offs. Quite often I would let the clock run and run to make sure a real decision was rendered. But no one ever questioned me. In fact over those 5 years and the ensuing 10 or so, no one ever questioned me about anything. Just the fact that I had a “special” relationship with the “Man” gave me a lifetime pass. Both Randy and Jimmy always treated me like a “brother” and we got along famously until the end of the run in 1977. I was 32 years old and had seen hundreds of matches, scores of tournaments, and G-D knows how many matches. I knew all the Section greats from 1961 until 1977. Who I did not know, Randy or Henry told met about. But after Lee's departure, I never saw Mount Vernon wrestle again.

 

By the way I know your sister, and just spoke to her husband the other day about our upcoming 40th reunion. I write a newsletter twice a year for my class in the name of the late Jon Breen, a close friend and classmate of mine who died at age 48 in 1993. I have raised about $25,000 in Jon's name and sponsor an essay contest yearly. I give and judge a history prize in Henry's name yearly. I have been doing the Jon Breen Memorial Fund Essay contest for 9 years. I know Linda Fairstein and used to golf with her older brother Guy. I'll e-mail you a copy of the last few newsletters.

 

So, hopefully I have filled in some of the gaps; give me a call one of these days. It will be fun to talk about those “good old bygone days”.   rjg  

Littlefield and the Wizard of Oz” 3-2003

Henry Littlefield Article in the London Financial Times            3-2003

 

 

My sister, Mrs. Charles (Kaaren) Hale of London, sent me your article that included your section on “Back to Oz.”  It was of great interest to me because I knew the great Henry Littlefield longer and better than anyone except his dear wife and widow Madeline. I met Henry as a high school student in Mount Vernon, NY, a medium sized city just north of the Bronx, a borough of NYC. It was in 1960 when I was 15. Henry was an exceptional history teacher and history was one of my intellectual interests then and now. But I was also an athlete and Henry was emerging as one of the finest scholastic wrestling coaches in America. He had been a great competitor at Columbia University, was a Lieutenant in the US Marine Corp, where he wrestled and earned a black belt in Judo. After his discharge he competed in the American amateur wrestling world of Olympic freestyle, Greco-Roman, and Partire. Henry competed for the NY Athletic Club and was a member of a number of National AAU winning teams. At 6'5″ and 250 lbs he was quite a mountain of a man. John Irving, the novelist and a enthusiastic amateur wrestler and coach described Henry in his memoir “Trying to Save Piggy Sneed” affectionately and he stated in an interview with “Salon” magazine, that he had two sets of friends, the literary types and the athletes- and they were mutually exclusive. Littlefield would have been one of the few friends of his that bridged the gap between his literary and athletic sides.

 

I knew and loved that great man for 40 years until his untimely death at age 66. He left Mount Vernon High School for Northampton, Ma, and eventually Amherst College in 1967 as I had graduated college. He came to my wedding; my wife Linda and I visited him and his wife and daughters in his home on Massasoit Street in Northampton Ma. He taught history at Amherst, was Dean of Men, was their outstanding wrestling coach, and by the way lived in Calvin Coolidge's old home! Henry wrote some great pieces on Cool Cal. I raised a family, ran a business, and we both talked on the phone and wrote often to each other. In fact I estimate about 5000 letters were exchanged from September 1963 when I left for college and the spring of 2000 when he left us.

 

Henry went out to Monterrey, California after 9 years at Amherst. He was such a great legendary figure in the Amherst wrestling room, that when he left, the team refused to have another coach. Henry settled eventually in Pacific Grove, ran the York School as Headmaster, taught and lectured at the Stevenson School on the Monterrey Peninsular and created a whole new world for himself. He acted, he preached Church sermons, wrote poetry and was a counselor to many. When Henry died of colon cancer, I traveled out there with a protégé of Henry's a wonderful former wrestler and coach named Randy Forrest. Even though we flew to San Francisco together and drove down and back to Monterrey it was a lonely journey. Neither of us, both married with grown children and at ages 55 and 61, had ever been to California. It was a brave sad new world for both of us. Randy a giant of a black man from neighboring New Rochelle, was a legendary figure to a nicely well off Jewish kid from Mount Vernon. We came from two different worlds when we met in 1960. We were two different and distinct types of worshippers at the feet of this great and wonderful man. Even though he was only 11 years older than I and 5 years older than Randy he was our leader bar none. We talked all the way to Monterrey and back. Once there, we were part of an incredible throng of 1000 or more people that came to his memorial service. Of those people, few even knew he had wrestled or had been one of the great coaches in America. If he had lived in the East for that extra 24 years, maybe 10,000 would have come out! It really closed a great and marvelous chapter of my life. It was a tearful farewell to his wonderful wife Madeline and their now grown children. I remembered when their second child Mary was born when I was a sophomore in high school. Now both little girls were grown women. So Randy and I traveled back after 3 long days together. We had not talked much in the last number of years, but we were totally immersed with each other. Can you imagine two men married about 70 years combined, traveling without our wives for the first time, and re-hashing wrestling bouts competed 35 years earlier? Strange! That was the last time I saw Randy. He moved to Virginia to be near his wife's family and left New York, Westchester County and New Rochelle behind after 60 years. It was fitting. I met him because of Henry, and over the intervening 40 years we always talked about Henry, and now that Henry was gone maybe our time was gone too.

 

I remember so well Henry's constant interest in the “Wizard of Oz.” He loved that story, and he loved mysticism. He always talked about Baum and what he was trying to say. Henry always was searching for the real meaning of life. He was always wondering about those elusive answers. There was no one like him, and all who knew him will miss him forever.

 

The Money Pit President 10-3-03 Letter to the Editor

October 3, 2003

The Journal News

Letter to the Editor:

letters@thejournalnews.com

 

The Money Pit President and the “Do-Nothing” Congress

 

Here we are thirteen months from our next national election and we are experiencing an interesting phenomenon. On one hand we have the Money Pit President who has spent this country into unprecedented deficits without doing anything to improve the deteriorating rolling stock of the country. With schools, bridges, roads, sewage systems, watersheds, and the power grids of the country suffering from a case of fiscal starvation, the President, like Tom Hanks asks for billions for his Money Pit in Iraq. Most people would probably support his effort there if he hadn’t fabricated most of the information that led the people and Congress to initially support the recent and continuing war. On the other hand we have our new version of the “Do-Nothing Congress”. This term was first used by President Truman to characterize the Republican led Senate and House during the 1948 campaign. We have a Congress that has passed tax relief for multi millionaires, while ignoring health coverage for millions, soaring prescription drug costs, the drainage of American jobs overseas, unprecedented trade deficits, increased crime, rising unemployment, scandals on Wall Street, the profligacy of corporate brigands, global warming, water quality, energy dependency on foreign suppliers, funding for Homeland Security and an endless and growing list of other inadequacies. When President Bush came into the White House, on his full first day in officer, he reflected on a prayer inscribed on a mantelpiece from John Adams, “… that only the wise and honest may rule under this roof.” Can we really believe that that prayer has been fulfilled?

 

 

Richard J. Garfunkel

 

Fahrenheit 9/11 the Movie 6-30-04 Letter to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

The Journal News

letters@thejournalnews.com

June 30, 2004

 

To the Editor:

 

Last night my wife Linda and I went to the Jacob Burns Film Center in Pleasantville to see Fahrenheit 9/11. At the end of the sellout performance, Michael Moore’s film was given a standing ovation. Mr. Moore has done a great service to this nation with his powerful cinematic indictment of the Bush administration and its cynical defense of the war in Iraq, its unseemly and duplicitous connections with the Saudi Arabian royal family, its failure to capture Osama Bin Ladin and his Taliban allies, and its payoff to big business at the expense of the average soldier. As Samuel Johnson said, “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” President Bush has wrapped himself in the bloody red flag of patriotism to indulge in foreign adventurism without true regard to the ongoing problem of worldwide terrorism. Moore alerts us to the fact that Bush had exercised little regard for terrorism before 9/11, was unprepared for the possibility of attack, and had Sadaam Hussein in his sights from his first day in office. No one doubts that Sadaam Hussein, and his regime, were a stain on the worldwide body politic. But after years of containment and the attrition of his armed forces, why were we lied to about his power, his weapons of mass destruction and his connection to Al Queda? Why didn’t the Bush Administration level with the American people? Maybe the American people would have felt differently, and thought twice, about sacrificing its sons and daughters for a war fought over oil and the removal of another petty dictator.

 

Richard J. Garfunkel